123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19181661)
21. Biological estimates of dose to inhabitants of Belarus and Ukraine following the Chernobyl accident.
Edwards A; Voisin P; Sorokine-Durm I; Maznik N; Vinnikov V; Mikhalevich L; Moquet J; Lloyd D; Delbos M; Durand V
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 111(2):211-9. PubMed ID: 15266074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Calculation of total effective dose equivalent and collective dose in the event of a LOCA in Bushehr Nuclear Power Plant.
Raisali G; Davilu H; Haghighishad A; Khodadadi R; Sabet M
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 121(4):382-90. PubMed ID: 16785243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Dose assessment for reentry or reoccupancy and recovery of urban areas contaminated by a radiological dispersal device: the need for a consensus approach.
Sullivan T; Musolino SV; DeFranco J
Health Phys; 2008 May; 94(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 18403962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Monte Carlo modeling for individual monitoring.
Gualdrini G
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 125(1-4):139-44. PubMed ID: 17533157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Criticality accident dosimetry systems: an international intercomparison at the SILENE reactor in 2002.
Médioni R; Asselineau B; Verrey B; Trompier F; Itié C; Texier C; Muller H; Pelcot G; Clairand I; Jacquet X; Pochat JL
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 110(1-4):429-36. PubMed ID: 15353686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Potential of modern technologies for improvement of in vivo calibration.
Franck D; de Carlan L; Fisher H; Pierrat N; Schlagbauer M; Wahl W
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 125(1-4):438-43. PubMed ID: 17337736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Methodology and tools for source term assessment in case of emergency.
Herviou K; Calmtorp C
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 109(1-2):53-7. PubMed ID: 15238656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Chemical dosimetry system for criticality accidents.
Miljanić S; Ilijas B
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 110(1-4):477-81. PubMed ID: 15353694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Averaged particle dose conversion coefficients in air crew dosimetry.
Mares V; Roesler S; Schraube H
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 110(1-4):371-6. PubMed ID: 15353676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A phantom for effective dose measurement: organ dose distribution assessment based on a numerical approach.
Furstoss C; Ménard S; Clairand I; Chau Q
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 125(1-4):180-4. PubMed ID: 17675663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Action levels for automatic gamma-measurements based on probabilistic radionuclide transport calculations.
Lauritzen B; Hedemann-Jensen P
J Radiol Prot; 2005 Dec; 25(4):417-34. PubMed ID: 16340070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Monte Carlo study of a 60Co calibration field of the Dosimetry Laboratory Seibersdorf.
Hranitzky C; Stadtmann H
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 125(1-4):153-6. PubMed ID: 17337744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The Austria-Czech Republic co-operation in the field of radiation-emergency preparedness.
Prouza Z; Drabova D; Moltasova J; Hohenberg JK; Hofer P
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 109(1-2):105-10. PubMed ID: 15238666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. EPR dosimetry in a mixed neutron and gamma radiation field.
Trompier F; Fattibene P; Tikunov D; Bartolotta A; Carosi A; Doca MC
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 110(1-4):437-42. PubMed ID: 15353687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The chornobyl accident: estimation of radiation doses received by the Baltic and Ukrainian cleanup workers.
Bouville A; Chumak VV; Inskip PD; Kryuchkov V; Luckyanov N
Radiat Res; 2006 Jul; 166(1 Pt 2):158-67. PubMed ID: 16808604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Gafchromic film as a fast visual indicator of radiation exposure of first responders.
Oren U; Rääf CL; Mattsson S
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Jun; 150(1):119-23. PubMed ID: 21926417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Personal neutron dosimetry in nuclear power plants using etched track and albedo thermoluminescence dosemeters.
Fernández F; Bakali M; Amgarou K; Nourreddine A; Mouhssine D
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 110(1-4):701-4. PubMed ID: 15353734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Dose evaluation in criticality accident conditions using transient critical facilities fueled with a fissile solution.
Nakamura T; Tonoike K; Miyoshi Y
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 110(1-4):483-6. PubMed ID: 15353695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Czech results at criticality dosimetry intercomparison 2002.
Frantisek S; Jaroslav T
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 110(1-4):455-8. PubMed ID: 15353690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Narrow beam neutron dosimetry.
Ferenci MS
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 110(1-4):813-7. PubMed ID: 15353751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
