These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19181767)

  • 1. Evaluation of modeling procedure for fitting in situ feed degradation profiles.
    Zanton GI; Heinrichs AJ
    J Anim Sci; 2009 Jun; 87(6):2080-8. PubMed ID: 19181767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In vitro gas production profiles to estimate extent and effective first-order rate of neutral detergent fiber digestion in the rumen.
    Huhtanen P; Seppälä A; Ots M; Ahvenjärvi S; Rinne M
    J Anim Sci; 2008 Mar; 86(3):651-9. PubMed ID: 17998429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prediction of in vivo neutral detergent fiber digestibility and digestion rate of potentially digestible neutral detergent fiber: comparison of models.
    Huhtanen P; Seppälä A; Ahvenjärvi S; Rinne M
    J Anim Sci; 2008 Oct; 86(10):2657-69. PubMed ID: 18539835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparing relative feed value with degradation parameters of grass and legume forages.
    Hackmann TJ; Sampson JD; Spain JN
    J Anim Sci; 2008 Sep; 86(9):2344-56. PubMed ID: 18441075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A compartmental model to analyze ruminal digestion.
    Van Milgen J; Murphy MR; Berger LL
    J Dairy Sci; 1991 Aug; 74(8):2515-29. PubMed ID: 1918531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pharmacodynamic parameter estimation: population size versus number of samples.
    Girgis S; Pai SM; Girgis IG; Batra VK
    AAPS J; 2005 Oct; 7(2):46. PubMed ID: 16353905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Simulation studies of errors of parameter estimates in pharmacokinetics.
    Betzien G; Kaufmann B; Schneider B; Ritschel WA
    Arzneimittelforschung; 1985; 35(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 3838673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Identifiability and retrievability of unique parameters describing intrinsic Andrews kinetics.
    Seagren EA; Kim H; Smets BF
    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2003 May; 61(4):314-22. PubMed ID: 12743760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Nonlinear mixed-effects modeling: individualization and prediction.
    Olofsen E; Dinges DF; Van Dongen HP
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2004 Mar; 75(3 Suppl):A134-40. PubMed ID: 15018275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An assessment of mixed-modeling approaches for characterizing profiles of time-varying response and predictor variables.
    Madden LV; Paul PA
    Phytopathology; 2010 Oct; 100(10):1015-29. PubMed ID: 20839937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. REML estimation of variance parameters in nonlinear mixed effects models using the SAEM algorithm.
    Meza C; Jaffrézic F; Foulley JL
    Biom J; 2007 Dec; 49(6):876-88. PubMed ID: 17638294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A generalized compartmental model to estimate the fibre mass in the ruminoreticulum: 1. Estimating parameters of digestion.
    Vieira RA; Tedeschi LO; Cannas A
    J Theor Biol; 2008 Dec; 255(4):345-56. PubMed ID: 18789339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Nonlinear mixed effects to improve glucose minimal model parameter estimation: a simulation study in intensive and sparse sampling.
    Denti P; Bertoldo A; Vicini P; Cobelli C
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2009 Sep; 56(9):2156-66. PubMed ID: 19380266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of different nonlinear functions to describe Nelore cattle growth.
    Forni S; Piles M; Blasco A; Varona L; Oliveira HN; Lôbo RB; Albuquerque LG
    J Anim Sci; 2009 Feb; 87(2):496-506. PubMed ID: 18708609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Near infrared and acoustic chemometrics monitoring of volatile fatty acids and dry matter during co-digestion of manure and maize silage.
    Lomborg CJ; Holm-Nielsen JB; Oleskowicz-Popiel P; Esbensen KH
    Bioresour Technol; 2009 Mar; 100(5):1711-9. PubMed ID: 19006665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of corn processing method and corn wet distillers grains plus solubles inclusion level in finishing steers.
    Corrigan ME; Erickson GE; Klopfenstein TJ; Luebbe MK; Vander Pol KJ; Meyer NF; Buckner CD; Vanness SJ; Hanford KJ
    J Anim Sci; 2009 Oct; 87(10):3351-62. PubMed ID: 19542508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Modeling procedure and surgical times for current procedural terminology-anesthesia-surgeon combinations and evaluation in terms of case-duration prediction and operating room efficiency: a multicenter study.
    Stepaniak PS; Heij C; Mannaerts GH; de Quelerij M; de Vries G
    Anesth Analg; 2009 Oct; 109(4):1232-45. PubMed ID: 19762753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of sampling regime on the mean and variance of home range size estimates.
    Börger L; Franconi N; De Michele G; Gantz A; Meschi F; Manica A; Lovari S; Coulson T
    J Anim Ecol; 2006 Nov; 75(6):1393-405. PubMed ID: 17032372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using a nonlinear mixed model to evaluate three models of human stature.
    Susman EP; Murphy JR; Zerbe GO; Jones RH
    Growth Dev Aging; 1998; 62(4):161-71. PubMed ID: 10219706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The population approach to pharmacokinetic data analysis: rationale and standard data analysis methods.
    Sheiner LB
    Drug Metab Rev; 1984; 15(1-2):153-71. PubMed ID: 6745080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.