These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

303 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19182044)

  • 1. Role of navigation in total hip arthroplasty.
    Kelley TC; Swank ML
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2009 Feb; 91 Suppl 1():153-8. PubMed ID: 19182044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Imageless navigation for insertion of the acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty: is it as accurate as CT-based navigation?
    Kalteis T; Handel M; Bäthis H; Perlick L; Tingart M; Grifka J
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2006 Feb; 88(2):163-7. PubMed ID: 16434517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Computed tomography-based navigation to determine the socket location in total hip arthroplasty of an osteoarthritis hip with a large leg length discrepancy due to severe acetabular dysplasia.
    Jingushi S; Mizu-uchi H; Nakashima Y; Yamamoto T; Mawatari T; Iwamoto Y
    J Arthroplasty; 2007 Oct; 22(7):1074-8. PubMed ID: 17920485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Component alignment in hip resurfacing using computer navigation.
    Bailey C; Gul R; Falworth M; Zadow S; Oakeshott R
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2009 Apr; 467(4):917-22. PubMed ID: 18972176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Accuracy improvement of acetabular component placement using non-image based surgical navigation system].
    Yu Z; Wang L; Gui J
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2007 Oct; 21(10):1057-61. PubMed ID: 17990769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Computed tomography-based navigation to determine the femoral neck osteotomy and location of the acetabular socket of an arthrodesed hip.
    Akiyama H; Kawanabe K; Ito T; Goto K; Nangaku M; Nakamura T
    J Arthroplasty; 2009 Dec; 24(8):1292.e1-4. PubMed ID: 19195838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Limitations of imageless computer-assisted navigation for total hip arthroplasty.
    Lin F; Lim D; Wixson RL; Milos S; Hendrix RW; Makhsous M
    J Arthroplasty; 2011 Jun; 26(4):596-605. PubMed ID: 20817389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Validation of a computer navigation system and a CT method for determination of the orientation of implanted acetabular cup in total hip arthroplasty: a cadaver study.
    Lin F; Lim D; Wixson RL; Milos S; Hendrix RW; Makhsous M
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2008 Oct; 23(8):1004-11. PubMed ID: 18541352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Total hip arthroplasty using imageless computer-assisted hip navigation: a prospective randomized study.
    Lass R; Kubista B; Olischar B; Frantal S; Windhager R; Giurea A
    J Arthroplasty; 2014 Apr; 29(4):786-91. PubMed ID: 24290738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of cemented vs uncemented acetabular component positioning using an imageless navigation system.
    Chawda M; Hucker P; Whitehouse SL; Crawford RW; English H; Donnelly WJ
    J Arthroplasty; 2009 Dec; 24(8):1170-3. PubMed ID: 19056209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The use of computer navigation in hip arthroplasty: literature review and evidence today.
    Punwar S; Khan WS; Longo UG
    Ortop Traumatol Rehabil; 2011; 13(5):431-8. PubMed ID: 22147432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Three-Dimensional Templating for Acetabular Component Alignment During Total Hip Arthroplasty.
    Elbuluk AM; Wojack P; Eftekhary N; Vigdorchik JM
    Orthopedics; 2017 Jul; 40(4):e708-e713. PubMed ID: 28558114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Imageless navigation in hip resurfacing: avoiding component malposition during the surgeon learning curve.
    Romanowski JR; Swank ML
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Aug; 90 Suppl 3():65-70. PubMed ID: 18676939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A randomised study comparing resection of acetabular bone at resurfacing and total hip replacement.
    Vendittoli PA; Lavigne M; Girard J; Roy AG
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2006 Aug; 88(8):997-1002. PubMed ID: 16877595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Validation and usefulness of a computer-assisted cup-positioning system in total hip arthroplasty. A prospective, randomized, controlled study.
    Parratte S; Argenson JN
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2007 Mar; 89(3):494-9. PubMed ID: 17332097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Design and primary application of computer-assisted, patient-specific navigational templates in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
    Zhang YZ; Lu S; Yang Y; Xu YQ; Li YB; Pei GX
    J Arthroplasty; 2011 Oct; 26(7):1083-7. PubMed ID: 20932709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Independent Evaluation of a Mechanical Hip Socket Navigation System in Total Hip Arthroplasty.
    Jennings JM; Randell TR; Green CL; Zheng G; Wellman SS
    J Arthroplasty; 2016 Mar; 31(3):658-61. PubMed ID: 26614747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Imageless computer navigation for placement of the femoral component in resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip.
    Olsen M; Davis ET; Waddell JP; Schemitsch EH
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2009 Mar; 91(3):310-5. PubMed ID: 19258604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Does computer-assisted surgery improve accuracy and decrease the learning curve in hip resurfacing? A radiographic analysis.
    Seyler TM; Lai LP; Sprinkle DI; Ward WG; Jinnah RH
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Aug; 90 Suppl 3():71-80. PubMed ID: 18676940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Orientation of the acetabular component. A comparison of five navigation systems with conventional surgical technique.
    Honl M; Schwieger K; Salineros M; Jacobs J; Morlock M; Wimmer M
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2006 Oct; 88(10):1401-5. PubMed ID: 17012436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.