These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19182126)

  • 21. Measures of sensitivity based on a single hit rate and false alarm rate: the accuracy, precision, and robustness of d', Az, and A'.
    Verde ME; MacMillan NA; Rotello CM
    Percept Psychophys; 2006 May; 68(4):643-54. PubMed ID: 16933428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Interference from multi-dimensional objects during feature and conjunction discriminations.
    Fournier LR; Bowd C; Herbert RJ
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 Feb; 53(1):191-209. PubMed ID: 10718070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Measuring target detection performance in paradigms with high event rates.
    Bendixen A; Andersen SK
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2013 May; 124(5):928-40. PubMed ID: 23266090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Reinforcer control and human signal-detection performance.
    Johnstone V; Alsop B
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2000 May; 73(3):275-90. PubMed ID: 10866352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The optimal correction for estimating extreme discriminability.
    Brown GS; White KG
    Behav Res Methods; 2005 Aug; 37(3):436-49. PubMed ID: 16405138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Efficiently measuring recognition performance with sparse data.
    Schooler LJ; Shiffrin RM
    Behav Res Methods; 2005 Feb; 37(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 16097339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Quantifying stimulus discriminability: a comparison of information theory and ideal observer analysis.
    Thomson EE; Kristan WB
    Neural Comput; 2005 Apr; 17(4):741-78. PubMed ID: 15829089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Assessing dissimilarity relations under missing data conditions: evidence from computer simulations.
    Allen NJ; Stanley DJ; Williams H; Ross SJ
    J Appl Psychol; 2007 Sep; 92(5):1414-26. PubMed ID: 17845094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Dopamine agonists and antagonists can produce an attenuation of response bias in a temporal discrimination task depending on discriminability of target duration.
    Harper DN; Bizo LA; Peters H
    Behav Processes; 2006 Feb; 71(2-3):286-96. PubMed ID: 16413975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A decisional component of holistic encoding.
    Wenger MJ; Ingvalson EM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Sep; 28(5):872-92. PubMed ID: 12219796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Interval bias in 2AFC detection tasks: sorting out the artifacts.
    García-Pérez MA; Alcalá-Quintana R
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Oct; 73(7):2332-52. PubMed ID: 21735314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The conditional approach to evaluating detection performance.
    Schwarz W
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 May; 84(4):1393-1402. PubMed ID: 34625913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The dispersions of estimates of sensitivity obtained from four psychophysical procedures: implications for experimental design.
    Hautus MJ; Lee AJ
    Percept Psychophys; 1998 May; 60(4):638-49. PubMed ID: 9628995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Null category-length and target-lure relatedness effects in episodic recognition: a constraint on item-noise interference models.
    Cho KW; Neely JH
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(7):1331-55. PubMed ID: 23234500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. How many response options? A study of remember-know testing procedures.
    Bruno D; Rutherford A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Jun; 134(2):125-9. PubMed ID: 20137771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Sample size and the detection of correlation--a signal detection account: comment on Kareev (2000) and Juslin and Olsson (2005).
    Anderson RB; Doherty ME; Berg ND; Friedrich JC
    Psychol Rev; 2005 Jan; 112(1):268-79; discussion 280-5. PubMed ID: 15631599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The distribution of subjective memory strength: list strength and response bias.
    Criss AH
    Cogn Psychol; 2009 Dec; 59(4):297-319. PubMed ID: 19765699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Bias and sensitivity in two-interval forced choice procedures: Tests of the difference model.
    Yeshurun Y; Carrasco M; Maloney LT
    Vision Res; 2008 Aug; 48(17):1837-51. PubMed ID: 18585750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A similarity-based range-frequency model for two-category rating data.
    Wedell DH
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2008 Jun; 15(3):638-43. PubMed ID: 18567267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The own-age bias in face recognition: a meta-analytic and theoretical review.
    Rhodes MG; Anastasi JS
    Psychol Bull; 2012 Jan; 138(1):146-74. PubMed ID: 22061689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.