These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

395 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19182700)

  • 1. Spatial scaling of the binocular capture effect.
    Raghunandan A; Anderson CS; Saladin JJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 2009 Mar; 86(3):279-85. PubMed ID: 19182700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Binocular capture: the effects of spatial frequency and contrast polarity of the monocular target.
    Raghunandan A
    Vision Res; 2011 Dec; 51(23-24):2369-77. PubMed ID: 21982870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The perceived visual direction of monocular objects in random-dot stereograms is influenced by perceived depth and allelotropia.
    Hariharan-Vilupuru S; Bedell HE
    Vision Res; 2009 Jan; 49(2):190-201. PubMed ID: 18992271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Capture of visual direction in dynamic vergence is reduced with flashed monocular lines.
    Jaschinski W; Jainta S; Schürer M
    Vision Res; 2006 Aug; 46(16):2608-14. PubMed ID: 16530245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Binocular capture: the role of non-linear position mechanisms.
    Raghunandan A; Andrus J
    Vision Res; 2014 Sep; 102():11-8. PubMed ID: 25038473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stereoscopic depth magnitude estimation: effects of stimulus spatial frequency and eccentricity.
    Cisarik PM; Harwerth RS
    Behav Brain Res; 2005 May; 160(1):88-98. PubMed ID: 15836903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A VEP measure of the binocular fusion of horizontal and vertical disparities.
    Hale J; Harrad RA; McKee SP; Pettet MW; Norcia AM
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 May; 46(5):1786-90. PubMed ID: 15851583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Spatial scale of stereomotion speed processing.
    Brooks KR; Stone LS
    J Vis; 2006 Oct; 6(11):1257-66. PubMed ID: 17209733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pictorial cues constrain depth in da Vinci stereopsis.
    Makino Y; Yano M
    Vision Res; 2006 Jan; 46(1-2):91-105. PubMed ID: 16271743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Differences in perceived depth for temporally correlated and uncorrelated dynamic random-dot stereograms.
    Gheorghiu E; Erkelens CJ
    Vision Res; 2005 Jun; 45(12):1603-14. PubMed ID: 15781076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Vertical-size disparities are temporally integrated for slant perception.
    Fukuda K; Kaneko H; Matsumiya K
    Vision Res; 2006 Sep; 46(17):2749-56. PubMed ID: 16600323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effects of interocular correlation and contrast on stereoscopic depth magnitude estimation.
    Cisarik PM; Harwerth RS
    Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Mar; 85(3):164-73. PubMed ID: 18317331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Vernier acuity for stereodisparate objects and ocular prevalence.
    Heinrich SP; Kromeier M; Bach M; Kommerell G
    Vision Res; 2005 May; 45(10):1321-8. PubMed ID: 15733964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Localization of monocular stimuli in different depth planes.
    Shimono K; Tam WJ; Asakura N; Ohmi M
    Vision Res; 2005 Sep; 45(20):2631-41. PubMed ID: 16005487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Interaction between binocular rivalry and depth in plaid patterns.
    Buckthought A; Wilson HR
    Vision Res; 2007 Sep; 47(19):2543-56. PubMed ID: 17688905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Binocular functional exploration: fundamental aspects and analysis by the Fusio-Test].
    Bourdy C; Cottin F; James Y
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 1988; 11(5):441-51. PubMed ID: 3057057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Illusory depth perception of oblique lines produced by overlaid vertical disparity.
    Ito H
    Vision Res; 2005 Mar; 45(7):931-42. PubMed ID: 15644231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An unexpected specialization for horizontal disparity in primate primary visual cortex.
    Cumming BG
    Nature; 2002 Aug; 418(6898):633-6. PubMed ID: 12167860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Troxler effect with dichoptic stimulus presentations: evidence for binocular inhibitory summation and interocular suppression.
    Lou L
    Vision Res; 2008 Jun; 48(14):1514-21. PubMed ID: 18511096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Depth scaling in phantom and monocular gap stereograms using absolute distance information.
    Kuroki D; Nakamizo S
    Vision Res; 2006 Nov; 46(25):4206-16. PubMed ID: 17045325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.