These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

638 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19183202)

  • 1. Optimal allocation of resources among threatened species: a project prioritization protocol.
    Joseph LN; Maloney RF; Possingham HP
    Conserv Biol; 2009 Apr; 23(2):328-38. PubMed ID: 19183202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of risk aversion on prioritizing conservation projects.
    Tulloch AI; Maloney RF; Joseph LN; Bennett JR; Di Fonzo MM; Probert WJ; O'Connor SM; Densem JP; Possingham HP
    Conserv Biol; 2015 Apr; 29(2):513-24. PubMed ID: 25327837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Threatened species and the potential loss of phylogenetic diversity: conservation scenarios based on estimated extinction probabilities and phylogenetic risk analysis.
    Faith DP
    Conserv Biol; 2008 Dec; 22(6):1461-70. PubMed ID: 18798854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Optimizing allocation of management resources for wildlife.
    Marsh H; Dennis A; Hines H; Kutt A; McDonald K; Weber E; Williams S; Winter J
    Conserv Biol; 2007 Apr; 21(2):387-99. PubMed ID: 17391189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Incorporating evolutionary measures into conservation prioritization.
    Redding DW; Mooers AØ
    Conserv Biol; 2006 Dec; 20(6):1670-8. PubMed ID: 17181802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Optimal marking of threatened species to balance benefits of information with impacts of marking.
    McCarthy MA; Parris KM
    Conserv Biol; 2008 Dec; 22(6):1506-12. PubMed ID: 18680498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Optimal allocation of conservation resources to species that may be extinct.
    Rout TM; Heinze D; McCarthy MA
    Conserv Biol; 2010 Aug; 24(4):1111-8. PubMed ID: 20214673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. When should we save the most endangered species?
    Wilson HB; Joseph LN; Moore AL; Possingham HP
    Ecol Lett; 2011 Sep; 14(9):886-90. PubMed ID: 21749599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Incorporating the effects of socioeconomic uncertainty into priority setting for conservation investment.
    McBride MF; Wilson KA; Bode M; Possingham HP
    Conserv Biol; 2007 Dec; 21(6):1463-74. PubMed ID: 18173470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Building on IUCN regional red lists to produce lists of species of conservation priority: a model with Irish bees.
    Fitzpatrick U; Murray TE; Paxton RJ; Brown MJ
    Conserv Biol; 2007 Oct; 21(5):1324-32. PubMed ID: 17883497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Conserving biodiversity and ecosystem function through limited development: an empirical evaluation.
    Milder JC; Lassoie JP; Bedford BL
    Conserv Biol; 2008 Feb; 22(1):70-9. PubMed ID: 18254854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of land use on threatened species.
    Lenzen M; Lane A; Widmer-Cooper A; Williams M
    Conserv Biol; 2009 Apr; 23(2):294-306. PubMed ID: 19183200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Setting conservation priorities.
    Wilson KA; Carwardine J; Possingham HP
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2009 Apr; 1162():237-64. PubMed ID: 19432651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of a threatened-species focus on conservation planning.
    Drummond SP; Wilson KA; Meijaard E; Watts M; Dennis R; Christy L; Possingham HP
    Conserv Biol; 2010 Apr; 24(2):441-9. PubMed ID: 19843123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Resource allocation for efficient environmental management.
    McCarthy MA; Thompson CJ; Hauser C; Burgman MA; Possingham HP; Moir ML; Tiensin T; Gilbert M
    Ecol Lett; 2010 Oct; 13(10):1280-9. PubMed ID: 20718844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A large-scale application of project prioritization to threatened species investment by a government agency.
    Brazill-Boast J; Williams M; Rickwood B; Partridge T; Bywater G; Cumbo B; Shannon I; Probert WJM; Ravallion J; Possingham H; Maloney RF
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0201413. PubMed ID: 30106972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cutting the cake: supporting environmental fund allocation decisions.
    Hajkowicz S
    J Environ Manage; 2009 Jun; 90(8):2737-45. PubMed ID: 19375214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Economic valuation of biodiversity conservation: the meaning of numbers.
    Martín-López B; Montes C; Benayas J
    Conserv Biol; 2008 Jun; 22(3):624-35. PubMed ID: 18410400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Subpopulation triage: how to allocate conservation effort among populations.
    McDonald-Madden E; Baxter PW; Possingham HP
    Conserv Biol; 2008 Jun; 22(3):656-65. PubMed ID: 18477029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. National threatened species listing based on IUCN criteria and regional guidelines: current status and future perspectives.
    Miller RM; Rodríguez JP; Aniskowicz-Fowler T; Bambaradeniya C; Boles R; Eaton MA; Gärdenfors U; Keller V; Molur S; Walker S; Pollock C
    Conserv Biol; 2007 Jun; 21(3):684-96. PubMed ID: 17531047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 32.