BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19184575)

  • 1. A comparison of sampling designs for monitoring recreational trail impacts in Rocky Mountain National Park.
    Pettebone D; Newman P; Theobald D
    Environ Manage; 2009 Mar; 43(3):523-32. PubMed ID: 19184575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Enhancing the utility of visitor impact assessment in parks and protected areas: a combined social-ecological approach.
    D'Antonio A; Monz C; Newman P; Lawson S; Taff D
    J Environ Manage; 2013 Jul; 124():72-81. PubMed ID: 23624424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of minimum impact education on visitor spatial behavior in parks and protected areas: An experimental investigation using GPS-based tracking.
    Kidd AM; Monz C; D'Antonio A; Manning RE; Reigner N; Goonan KA; Jacobi C
    J Environ Manage; 2015 Oct; 162():53-62. PubMed ID: 26225933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Translating science into policy: using ecosystem thresholds to protect resources in Rocky Mountain National Park.
    Porter E; Johnson S
    Environ Pollut; 2007 Oct; 149(3):268-80. PubMed ID: 17693003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Developing a monitoring protocol for visitor-created informal trails in Yosemite National Park, USA.
    Leung YF; Newburger T; Jones M; Kuhn B; Woiderski B
    Environ Manage; 2011 Jan; 47(1):93-106. PubMed ID: 21103872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Visitor impacts on trails in the Sagarmatha (Mt. Everest) National Park, Nepal.
    Nepal SK; Nepal SA
    Ambio; 2004 Aug; 33(6):334-40. PubMed ID: 15387069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Spatially characterizing visitor use and its association with informal trails in Yosemite Valley meadows.
    Walden-Schreiner C; Leung YF
    Environ Manage; 2013 Jul; 52(1):163-78. PubMed ID: 23689790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. BAS: balanced acceptance sampling of natural resources.
    Robertson BL; Brown JA; McDonald T; Jaksons P
    Biometrics; 2013 Sep; 69(3):776-84. PubMed ID: 23844595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mitigating Undesignated Trail Use: The Efficacy of Messaging and Direct Site Management Actions in an Urban-Proximate Open Space Context.
    Schwartz F; Taff BD; Lawhon B; VanderWoude D
    Environ Manage; 2018 Sep; 62(3):458-473. PubMed ID: 29740681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The influence of visitor use levels on visitor spatial behavior in off-trail areas of dispersed recreation use.
    D'Antonio A; Monz C
    J Environ Manage; 2016 Apr; 170():79-87. PubMed ID: 26803258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Spatially balanced sampling designs for environmental surveys.
    Kermorvant C; D'Amico F; Bru N; Caill-Milly N; Robertson B
    Environ Monit Assess; 2019 Jul; 191(8):524. PubMed ID: 31363924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The influence of use-related, environmental, and managerial factors on soil loss from recreational trails.
    Olive ND; Marion JL
    J Environ Manage; 2009 Mar; 90(3):1483-93. PubMed ID: 19062152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of extreme natural events on the provision of ecosystem services in a mountain environment: The importance of trail design in delivering system resilience and ecosystem service co-benefits.
    Tomczyk AM; White PC; Ewertowski MW
    J Environ Manage; 2016 Jan; 166():156-67. PubMed ID: 26496846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Differences in the impacts of formal and informal recreational trails on urban forest loss and tree structure.
    Ballantyne M; Pickering CM
    J Environ Manage; 2015 Aug; 159():94-105. PubMed ID: 26058001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. More than A to B: Understanding and managing visitor spatial behaviour in urban forests using public participation GIS.
    Korpilo S; Virtanen T; Saukkonen T; Lehvävirta S
    J Environ Manage; 2018 Feb; 207():124-133. PubMed ID: 29156435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Using crowd-sourced photos to assess seasonal patterns of visitor use in mountain-protected areas.
    Walden-Schreiner C; Rossi SD; Barros A; Pickering C; Leung YF
    Ambio; 2018 Nov; 47(7):781-793. PubMed ID: 29435731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of mountain biking versus hiking on trails under different environmental conditions.
    Evju M; Hagen D; Jokerud M; Olsen SL; Selvaag SK; Vistad OI
    J Environ Manage; 2021 Jan; 278(Pt 2):111554. PubMed ID: 33129028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluating the recreation potential of Ilgaz Mountain National Park in Turkey.
    Cetin M; Sevik H
    Environ Monit Assess; 2016 Jan; 188(1):52. PubMed ID: 26694709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effects of local ecological knowledge, minimum-impact knowledge, and prior experience on visitor perceptions of the ecological impacts of backcountry recreation.
    D'Antonio A; Monz C; Newman P; Lawson S; Taff D
    Environ Manage; 2012 Oct; 50(4):542-54. PubMed ID: 22814546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Toward the improvement of trail classification in national parks using the recreation opportunity spectrum approach.
    Oishi Y
    Environ Manage; 2013 Jun; 51(6):1126-36. PubMed ID: 23615956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.