These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19184994)

  • 1. Random fields--union intersection tests for detecting functional connectivity in EEG/MEG imaging.
    Carbonell F; Worsley KJ; Trujillo-Barreto NJ; Sotero RC
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2009 Aug; 30(8):2477-86. PubMed ID: 19184994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Random field-union intersection tests for EEG/MEG imaging.
    Carbonell F; Galán L; Valdés P; Worsley K; Biscay RJ; Díaz-Comas L; Bobes MA; Parra M
    Neuroimage; 2004 May; 22(1):268-76. PubMed ID: 15110017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Face-selective responses in combined EEG/MEG recordings with fast periodic visual stimulation (FPVS).
    Hauk O; Rice GE; Volfart A; Magnabosco F; Ralph MAL; Rossion B
    Neuroimage; 2021 Nov; 242():118460. PubMed ID: 34363957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hyperedge bundling: A practical solution to spurious interactions in MEG/EEG source connectivity analyses.
    Wang SH; Lobier M; Siebenhühner F; Puoliväli T; Palva S; Palva JM
    Neuroimage; 2018 Jun; 173():610-622. PubMed ID: 29378318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Empirical Bayes evaluation of fused EEG-MEG source reconstruction: Application to auditory mismatch evoked responses.
    Lecaignard F; Bertrand O; Caclin A; Mattout J
    Neuroimage; 2021 Feb; 226():117468. PubMed ID: 33075561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Algorithmic procedures for Bayesian MEG/EEG source reconstruction in SPM.
    López JD; Litvak V; Espinosa JJ; Friston K; Barnes GR
    Neuroimage; 2014 Jan; 84():476-87. PubMed ID: 24041874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. EEG and MEG coherence: measures of functional connectivity at distinct spatial scales of neocortical dynamics.
    Srinivasan R; Winter WR; Ding J; Nunez PL
    J Neurosci Methods; 2007 Oct; 166(1):41-52. PubMed ID: 17698205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A three domain covariance framework for EEG/MEG data.
    Roś BP; Bijma F; de Gunst MC; de Munck JC
    Neuroimage; 2015 Oct; 119():305-15. PubMed ID: 26072253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG- and MEG-data.
    Maris E; Oostenveld R
    J Neurosci Methods; 2007 Aug; 164(1):177-90. PubMed ID: 17517438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Phase lag index: assessment of functional connectivity from multi channel EEG and MEG with diminished bias from common sources.
    Stam CJ; Nolte G; Daffertshofer A
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2007 Nov; 28(11):1178-93. PubMed ID: 17266107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multivariate pattern analysis of MEG and EEG: A comparison of representational structure in time and space.
    Cichy RM; Pantazis D
    Neuroimage; 2017 Sep; 158():441-454. PubMed ID: 28716718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Phase shift invariant imaging of coherent sources (PSIICOS) from MEG data.
    Ossadtchi A; Altukhov D; Jerbi K
    Neuroimage; 2018 Dec; 183():950-971. PubMed ID: 30142449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A novel integrated MEG and EEG analysis method for dipolar sources.
    Huang MX; Song T; Hagler DJ; Podgorny I; Jousmaki V; Cui L; Gaa K; Harrington DL; Dale AM; Lee RR; Elman J; Halgren E
    Neuroimage; 2007 Sep; 37(3):731-48. PubMed ID: 17658272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. MNE software for processing MEG and EEG data.
    Gramfort A; Luessi M; Larson E; Engemann DA; Strohmeier D; Brodbeck C; Parkkonen L; Hämäläinen MS
    Neuroimage; 2014 Feb; 86():446-60. PubMed ID: 24161808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hierarchical multiscale Bayesian algorithm for robust MEG/EEG source reconstruction.
    Cai C; Sekihara K; Nagarajan SS
    Neuroimage; 2018 Dec; 183():698-715. PubMed ID: 30059734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Modeling sparse connectivity between underlying brain sources for EEG/MEG.
    Haufe S; Tomioka R; Nolte G; Müller KR; Kawanabe M
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2010 Aug; 57(8):1954-63. PubMed ID: 20483681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cancellation of EEG and MEG signals generated by extended and distributed sources.
    Ahlfors SP; Han J; Lin FH; Witzel T; Belliveau JW; Hämäläinen MS; Halgren E
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2010 Jan; 31(1):140-9. PubMed ID: 19639553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of a new MEG-EEG spatio-temporal localization approach using a realistic source model.
    Schwartz DP; Badier JM; Bihoué P; Bouliou A
    Brain Topogr; 1999; 11(4):279-89. PubMed ID: 10449259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Automated model selection in covariance estimation and spatial whitening of MEG and EEG signals.
    Engemann DA; Gramfort A
    Neuroimage; 2015 Mar; 108():328-42. PubMed ID: 25541187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. MEG and EEG data fusion: simultaneous localisation of face-evoked responses.
    Henson RN; Mouchlianitis E; Friston KJ
    Neuroimage; 2009 Aug; 47(2):581-9. PubMed ID: 19398023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.