74 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19185007)
1. Accuracy of Thinprep Imaging System in detecting atypical glandular cells.
Jayamohan Y; Karabakhtsian RG; Banks HW; Davey DD
Diagn Cytopathol; 2009 Jul; 37(7):479-82. PubMed ID: 19185007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. ThinPrep detection of cervical and endometrial adenocarcinoma: a retrospective cohort study.
Schorge JO; Hossein Saboorian M; Hynan L; Ashfaq R
Cancer; 2002 Dec; 96(6):338-43. PubMed ID: 12478681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effectiveness of the Thin Prep Imaging System in the detection of adenocarcinoma of the gynecologic system.
Friedlander MA; Rudomina D; Lin O
Cancer; 2008 Feb; 114(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 18085633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Papanicolaou smear sensitivity for the detection of adenocarcinoma of the cervix: a study of 49 cases.
Krane JF; Granter SR; Trask CE; Hogan CL; Lee KR
Cancer; 2001 Feb; 93(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 11241260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Histologic implications of Pap smears classified as atypical glandular cells.
Haidopoulos DA; Stefanidis K; Rodolakis A; Pilalis A; Symiakaki I; Diakomanolis E
J Reprod Med; 2005 Jul; 50(7):539-42. PubMed ID: 16130853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of ThinPrep Imaging System in detecting low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.
Zhang FF; Banks HW; Langford SM; Davey DD
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2007 May; 131(5):773-6. PubMed ID: 17488164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Interlaboratory reproducibility of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance: a national survey.
Confortini M; Di Bonito L; Carozzi F; Ghiringhello B; Montanari G; Parisio F; Prandi S;
Cytopathology; 2006 Dec; 17(6):353-60. PubMed ID: 17168918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Liquid-based Papanicolaou test (SurePath) interpretations before histologic diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasias and carcinomas: study of 272 cases classified by the 2001 Bethesda system.
Thrall M; Kjeldahl K; Gulbahce HE; Pambuccian SE
Cancer; 2007 Aug; 111(4):217-23. PubMed ID: 17599738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Endometrial cells and the AutoPap System for primary screening of cervicovaginal Pap smears.
Walts AE; Thomas P
Diagn Cytopathol; 2002 Oct; 27(4):232-7. PubMed ID: 12357502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The diagnostic value of the ThinPrep pap test in endometrial carcinoma: a prospective study with histological follow-up.
Zhou J; Tomashefski JF; Sawady J; Ferrer H; Khiyami A
Diagn Cytopathol; 2013 May; 41(5):408-12. PubMed ID: 22351503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An approach to post-radical trachelectomy vaginal-isthmus cytology.
Sauder K; Wilbur DC; Duska L; Tambouret RH
Diagn Cytopathol; 2009 Jun; 37(6):437-42. PubMed ID: 19217064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Automated screening versus manual screening: a comparison of the ThinPrep imaging system and manual screening in a time study.
Schledermann D; Hyldebrandt T; Ejersbo D; Hoelund B
Diagn Cytopathol; 2007 Jun; 35(6):348-52. PubMed ID: 17497655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Rapid review of liquid-based smears as a quality control measure.
Henderson S; Stevens M; Walker T
Diagn Cytopathol; 2004 Sep; 31(3):141-6. PubMed ID: 15349981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The utility of human papillomavirus testing in the management of atypical glandular cells on cytology.
Sharpless KE; O'Sullivan DM; Schnatz PF
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2009 Apr; 13(2):72-8. PubMed ID: 19387126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Restoring satisfactory status in ThinPrep Pap test specimens with too few squamous cells and containing microscopic red blood cells.
Pang Y; Smola B; Pu RT; Michael CW
Diagn Cytopathol; 2008 Oct; 36(10):696-700. PubMed ID: 18773435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cytologic features of endocervical glandular lesions: comparison of SurePath, ThinPrep, and conventional smear specimen preparations.
Belsley NA; Tambouret RH; Misdraji J; Muzikansky A; Russell DK; Wilbur DC
Diagn Cytopathol; 2008 Apr; 36(4):232-7. PubMed ID: 18335553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [The use of a computerised system in the reading of cytological cervicovaginals smears during programming of regional screening (one year of experience using the autopap system)].
Orlassino R; Fabbrini T; Gallo C; Vineis C
Pathologica; 2005 Apr; 97(2):78-83. PubMed ID: 16032952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Expression and utility of IMP3 in the differential diagnosis of atypical glandular cells and adenocarcinoma in liquid-based cervical cytology.
Ligato S; Valdes AY; Newcomb P; Cartun RW
J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2016; 5(5):277-285. PubMed ID: 31042504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Becton Dickinson FocalPoint GS Imaging System: clinical trials demonstrate significantly improved sensitivity for the detection of important cervical lesions.
Wilbur DC; Black-Schaffer WS; Luff RD; Abraham KP; Kemper C; Molina JT; Tench WD
Am J Clin Pathol; 2009 Nov; 132(5):767-75. PubMed ID: 19846820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of a low priced liquid-based method for cervical cytology in 632 women referred for colposcopy after a positive Pap smear.
van Hemel BM; Buikema HJ; Groen H; Suurmeijer AJ
Diagn Cytopathol; 2009 Aug; 37(8):579-83. PubMed ID: 19373881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
