93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19185438)
1. Image quality in conventional chest radiography. Evaluation using the postprocessing tool Diamond View.
Niemann T; Reisinger C; Rau P; Schwarz J; Ruis-Lopez L; Bongartz G
Eur J Radiol; 2010 Mar; 73(3):555-9. PubMed ID: 19185438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Image quality in conventional lumbar spine radiography: evaluation using the post-processing tool Diamond View.
Niemann T; Reisinger C; Ruiz-Lopez L; Bongartz G
Eur J Radiol; 2009 May; 70(2):357-61. PubMed ID: 18339503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment and optimisation of the image quality of chest-radiography systems.
Redlich U; Hoeschen C; Doehring W
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):264-8. PubMed ID: 15933119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Comparison of four digital and one conventional radiographic image systems for the chest in a patient study with subsequent system optimization].
Redlich U; Hoeschen C; Effenberger O; Fessel A; Preuss H; Reissberg S; Scherlach C; Döhring W
Rofo; 2005 Feb; 177(2):272-8. PubMed ID: 15666237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Physical image quality comparison of four types of digital detector for chest radiology.
Fernandez JM; Ordiales JM; Guibelalde E; Prieto C; Vano E
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):140-3. PubMed ID: 18283060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Digital thoracic radiography--a comparison of digital and analog imaging techniques].
Busch HP
Bildgebung; 1991; 58 Suppl 1():9-12. PubMed ID: 1799858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Visibility of normal thoracic anatomic landmarks on storage phosphor digital radiography versus conventional radiography.
Konen E; Greenberg I; Rozenman J
Isr Med Assoc J; 2005 Aug; 7(8):495-7. PubMed ID: 16106773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Patient doses and image quality in digital chest radiology.
Salát D; Nikodemová D
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):147-9. PubMed ID: 18321878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Harmonisation of the appearance of digital radiographs from different vendors by means of common external image processing.
Larsson L; Båth M; Engman EL; Månsson LG
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):92-7. PubMed ID: 20185456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Projection profile analysis for identifying different views of chest radiographs.
Kao EF; Lee C; Jaw TS; Hsu JS; Liu GC
Acad Radiol; 2006 Apr; 13(4):518-25. PubMed ID: 16554233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Reduction of patient exposure by the use of digital luminescence radiography].
Seifert H; Chapot C
J Radiol; 1999 Nov; 80(11):1555-60. PubMed ID: 10592912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Image quality and dose management in digital radiography: a new paradigm for optimisation.
Busch HP; Faulkner K
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):143-7. PubMed ID: 16461521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prototype system for enhancement of frontal chest radiographs using eigenimage processing.
Butler A; Bones P; Hurrell M
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2008 Jun; 52(3):244-53. PubMed ID: 18477119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Computed and conventional chest radiography: a comparison of image quality and radiation dose.
Ramli K; Abdullah BJ; Ng KH; Mahmud R; Hussain AF
Australas Radiol; 2005 Dec; 49(6):460-6. PubMed ID: 16351609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Simulated low-dose computed tomography in oncological patients: a feasibility study.
Yamamura J; Tornquist K; Buchert R; Wildberger J; Nagel HD; Dichtl D; Adam G; Wedegärtner U
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2010; 34(2):302-8. PubMed ID: 20351525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Managing patient dose in digital radiology. A report of the International Commission on Radiological Protection.
International Commission on Radiological Protection
Ann ICRP; 2004; 34(1):1-73. PubMed ID: 15302167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Patient dose in digital projection radiography.
Compagnone G; Pagan L; Baleni MC; Calzolaio FL; Barozzi L; Bergamini C
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):135-7. PubMed ID: 18252850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Optimisation of image plate radiography with respect to tube voltage.
Tingberg A; Sjöström D
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):286-93. PubMed ID: 15933123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical evaluation of a new set of image quality criteria for mammography.
Grahn A; Hemdal B; Andersson I; Ruschin M; Thilander-Klang A; Börjesson S; Tingberg A; Mattsson S; Håkansson M; Båth M; Månsson LG; Medin J; Wanninger F; Panzer W
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):389-94. PubMed ID: 15933143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Multidetector computed tomography chest examinations with low-kilovoltage protocols in adults: effect on image quality and radiation dose.
Kim MJ; Park CH; Choi SJ; Hwang KH; Kim HS
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009; 33(3):416-21. PubMed ID: 19478637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
