These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1918580)

  • 21. Surface characterization of current composites after toothbrush abrasion.
    Takahashi R; Jin J; Nikaido T; Tagami J; Hickel R; Kunzelmann KH
    Dent Mater J; 2013; 32(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 23370873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. In vitro toothbrush-dentifrice abrasion of two restorative composites.
    Teixeira EC; Thompson JL; Piascik JR; Thompson JY
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2005; 17(3):172-80; discussion 181-2. PubMed ID: 15996389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The effect of toothbrushing on surface gloss of resin composites.
    Lefever D; Perakis N; Roig M; Krejci I; Ardu S
    Am J Dent; 2012 Feb; 25(1):54-8. PubMed ID: 22558694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparative SEM studies of the enamel surface appearance following the use of glass ionomer cement and a diacrylate resin for bracket bonding.
    Ostman-Andersson E; Marcusson A; Hörstedt P
    Swed Dent J; 1993; 17(4):139-46. PubMed ID: 8236031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Surface properties of universal and flowable nanohybrid composites after simulated tooth brushing.
    Jin J; Takahashi R; Hickel R; Kunzelmann KH
    Am J Dent; 2014 Jun; 27(3):149-54. PubMed ID: 25208363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Wear evaluation of porcelain opposing gold, composite resin, and enamel.
    Kadokawa A; Suzuki S; Tanaka T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Oct; 96(4):258-65. PubMed ID: 17052470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Abrasive properties of commonly used dentifrices.
    Kinoshita S; Arai T; Uraguchi R
    Bull Tokyo Med Dent Univ; 1979 Sep; 26(3):225-42. PubMed ID: 290419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparative physico-mechanical characterization of new hybrid restorative materials with conventional glass-ionomer and resin composite restorative materials.
    Gladys S; Van Meerbeek B; Braem M; Lambrechts P; Vanherle G
    J Dent Res; 1997 Apr; 76(4):883-94. PubMed ID: 9126185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effect of contact area size on enamel and composite wear.
    Krejci I; Lutz F; Zedler C
    J Dent Res; 1992 Jul; 71(7):1413-6. PubMed ID: 1629457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Brushing effect of abrasive dentifrices during at-home bleaching with 10% carbamide peroxide on enamel surface roughness.
    Worschech CC; Rodrigues JA; Martins LR; Ambrosano GM
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Feb; 7(1):25-34. PubMed ID: 16491145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. In-vivo evaluation of the surface roughness and morphology of enamel after bracket removal and polishing by different techniques.
    Faria-Júnior ÉM; Guiraldo RD; Berger SB; Correr AB; Correr-Sobrinho L; Contreras EF; Lopes MB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Mar; 147(3):324-9. PubMed ID: 25726399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The effect of microabrasion on restorative materials and tooth surface.
    Chan DC; Lemke KC; Howell ML; Barghi N
    Oper Dent; 1996; 21(2):63-8. PubMed ID: 8957920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Chewing pressure vs. wear of composites and opposing enamel cusps.
    Lutz F; Krejci I; Barbakow F
    J Dent Res; 1992 Aug; 71(8):1525-9. PubMed ID: 1506518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Changes in the surface microrelief and the loss of dental enamel after the use of an abrasive spray of sodium bicarbonate].
    Kuliralo M; Dourov N
    Bull Group Int Rech Sci Stomatol Odontol; 1990 Jul; 33(2):77-82. PubMed ID: 1964618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Surface deterioration of resin composites and enamel after toothbrush simulation with new and used toothbrushes.
    Büyükgöze-Dindar M; Tekbaş-Atay M
    Am J Dent; 2024 Apr; 37(2):59-65. PubMed ID: 38704847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Assessing the surface roughness of a posterior resin composite: effect of surface sealing.
    Takeuchi CY; Orbegoso Flores VH; Palma Dibb RG; Panzeri H; Lara EH; Dinelli W
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(3):281-6. PubMed ID: 12760700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effect of ultrasonic, sonic and rotating-oscillating powered toothbrushing systems on surface roughness and wear of white spot lesions and sound enamel: An in vitro study.
    Hernandé-Gatón P; Palma-Dibb RG; Silva LABD; Faraoni JJ; de Queiroz AM; Lucisano MP; Silva RABD; Nelson Filho P
    Am J Dent; 2018 Apr; 31(2):76-80. PubMed ID: 29630790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Surface roughness and maintenance of surface sealants for resin composites after toothbrushing.
    Bonato F; Spohr AM; Mota EG; Rodrigues-Junior SA; Burnett LH
    Am J Dent; 2016 Feb; 29(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 27093775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effect of prophylactic treatments on the superficial roughness of dental tissues and of two esthetic restorative materials.
    Salami D; Luz MA
    Pesqui Odontol Bras; 2003; 17(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 12908062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Development of a composite resin disclosing agent based on the understanding of tooth staining mechanisms.
    Abdallah MN; Light N; Amin WM; Retrouvey JM; Cerruti M; Tamimi F
    J Dent; 2014 Jun; 42(6):697-708. PubMed ID: 24632474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.