These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1918629)

  • 1. Effect of different types of auditory stimulation on vowel formant frequencies in multichannel cochlear implant users.
    Svirsky MA; Tobey EA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Jun; 89(6):2895-904. PubMed ID: 1918629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effects of auditory feedback from the nucleus cochlear implant on the vowel formant frequencies produced by children and adults.
    Richardson LM; Busby PA; Blamey PJ; Dowell RC; Clark GM
    Ear Hear; 1993 Oct; 14(5):339-49. PubMed ID: 8224577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of auditory feedback deprivation length on the vowel /epsilon/ produced by pediatric cochlear-implant users.
    Bharadwaj SV; Graves AG; Bauer DD; Assmann PF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 May; 121(5 Pt1):EL196-202. PubMed ID: 17550203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Interactions of speaking condition and auditory feedback on vowel production in postlingually deaf adults with cochlear implants.
    Ménard L; Polak M; Denny M; Burton E; Lane H; Matthies ML; Marrone N; Perkell JS; Tiede M; Vick J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Jun; 121(6):3790-801. PubMed ID: 17552727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Changes in vowel quality in post-lingually deafened cochlear implant users.
    Langereis MC; Bosman AJ; van Olphen AF; Smoorenburg GF
    Audiology; 1997; 36(5):279-97. PubMed ID: 9305524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of Phantom Electrode Stimulation on Vocal Production in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Caldwell MT; Jiradejvong P; Limb CJ
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(5):1127-1139. PubMed ID: 30601240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Acoustic Analysis of Persian Vowels in Cochlear Implant Users: A Comparison With Hearing-impaired Children Using Hearing Aid and Normal-hearing Children.
    Jafari N; Yadegari F; Jalaie S
    J Voice; 2016 Nov; 30(6):763.e1-763.e7. PubMed ID: 26725549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Phoneme recognition by deaf individuals using the multichannel nucleus cochlear implant.
    Mülder HE; Van Olphen AF; Bosman A; Smoorenburg GF
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1992 Nov; 112(6):946-55. PubMed ID: 1481665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Speech changes following reimplantation from a single-channel to a multichannel cochlear implant.
    Economou A; Tartter VC; Chute PM; Hellman SA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Sep; 92(3):1310-23. PubMed ID: 1401518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of vowel production by children with multichannel cochlear implants or tactile aids: perceptual evidence.
    Ertmer DJ; Kirk KI; Sehgal ST; Riley AI; Osberger MJ
    Ear Hear; 1997 Aug; 18(4):307-15. PubMed ID: 9288476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Comparison of Persian Vowel Production in Hearing-Impaired Children Using a Cochlear Implant and Normal-Hearing Children.
    Jafari N; Drinnan M; Mohamadi R; Yadegari F; Nourbakhsh M; Torabinezhad F
    J Voice; 2016 May; 30(3):340-4. PubMed ID: 25990321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Saliency of Vowel Features in Neural Responses of Cochlear Implant Users.
    Prévost F; Lehmann A
    Clin EEG Neurosci; 2018 Nov; 49(6):388-397. PubMed ID: 29690785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Identification of speech by cochlear implant recipients with the Multipeak (MPEAK) and Spectral Peak (SPEAK) speech coding strategies. I. Vowels.
    Skinner MW; Fourakis MS; Holden TA; Holden LK; Demorest ME
    Ear Hear; 1996 Jun; 17(3):182-97. PubMed ID: 8807261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Speech production changes with the Nucleus 22-channel cochlear implant.
    Cummings S; Groenewald E; Coetzee L; Hugo R; Van Derlinde M
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():394-7. PubMed ID: 7668719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Synthetic vowel studies on cochlear implant patients.
    Tong YC; Lim HH; Clark GM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Sep; 84(3):876-87. PubMed ID: 3183206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Acoustic and perceptual appraisal of speech production in pediatric cochlear implant users.
    Poissant SF; Peters KA; Robb MP
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2006 Jul; 70(7):1195-203. PubMed ID: 16460814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of the loss of auditory feedback on segmental parameters of vowels of postlingually deafened speakers.
    Schenk BS; Baumgartner WD; Hamzavi JS
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2003 Dec; 30(4):333-9. PubMed ID: 14656557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The speech of a postlingually deafened teenager during the first year of use of a multichannel cochlear implant.
    Tartter VC; Chute PM; Hellman SA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Dec; 86(6):2113-21. PubMed ID: 2600301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of short-term auditory deprivation on speech production in adult cochlear implant users.
    Svirsky MA; Lane H; Perkell JS; Wozniak J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Sep; 92(3):1284-300. PubMed ID: 1401516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Contribution of formant frequency information to vowel perception in steady-state noise by cochlear implant users.
    Sagi E; Svirsky MA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Feb; 141(2):1027. PubMed ID: 28253672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.