These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1918632)

  • 1. Effect of silence duration in intervocalic velar plosive on voicing perception for normal and hearing-impaired subjects.
    Cazals Y; Palis L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Jun; 89(6):2916-21. PubMed ID: 1918632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Occlusive silence duration of voiceless intervocalic plosives and voicing perception by normal and hearing-impaired subjects.
    Cazals Y
    Ear Hear; 1994 Oct; 15(5):404-8. PubMed ID: 7813827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Acoustic cues to final stop voicing for impaired-and normal hearing listeners.
    Revoile S; Pickett JM; Holden LD; Talkin D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1982 Oct; 72(4):1145-54. PubMed ID: 7142580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Speech cue enhancement for the hearing impaired: I. Altered vowel durations for perception of final fricative voicing.
    Revoile SG; Holden-Pitt L; Pickett JM; Brandt F
    J Speech Hear Res; 1986 Jun; 29(2):240-55. PubMed ID: 3724117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Temporal and spectral cue use for initial plosive voicing perception by hearing-impaired children and normal-hearing children and adults.
    Holden-Pitt LD; Hazan V; Revoile SG; Edward DM; Droge J
    Eur J Disord Commun; 1995; 30(4):417-34. PubMed ID: 8634497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perception Abilities of L1 Cypriot Greek Listeners - Types of Errors Involving Plosive Consonants in L2 English.
    Kkese E; Petinou K
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2017 Feb; 46(1):1-25. PubMed ID: 26965243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cue-weighting in the perception of intervocalic stop voicing in European Portuguese.
    Pape D; Jesus LM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Sep; 136(3):1334. PubMed ID: 25190406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Speech recognition in noise, temporal and spectral resolution in normal and impaired hearing.
    Arlinger S; Dryselius H
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990; 469():30-7. PubMed ID: 2356736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of frequency selectivity and consonant recognition among hearing-impaired and masked normal-hearing listeners.
    Dubno JR; Schaefer AB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Apr; 91(4 Pt 1):2110-21. PubMed ID: 1597602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perceptual cues to the voiced-voiceless distinction of final fricatives for listeners with impaired or with normal hearing.
    Revoile SG; Holden-Pitt L; Pickett JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 Mar; 77(3):1263-5. PubMed ID: 3980876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Temporal integration of forward masking in listeners having sensorineural hearing loss.
    Kidd G; Mason CR; Feth LL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Mar; 75(3):937-44. PubMed ID: 6707324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An exploratory study into perception of acoustic speech cues by hearing-impaired adults.
    Verschuur C; Rafaely V
    Br J Audiol; 2001 Jun; 35(3):209-17. PubMed ID: 11548047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Temporal intraspeech masking of plosive bursts: effects of hearing loss and frequency shaping.
    Mackersie CL
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Jun; 50(3):554-63. PubMed ID: 17538099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Identification reaction times of voiced/voiceless continua: a right-ear advantage for VOT values near the phonetic boundary.
    Laguitton V; De Graaf JB; Chauvel P; Liegeois-Chauvel C
    Brain Lang; 2000 Nov; 75(2):153-62. PubMed ID: 11049664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Recognition performance on words interrupted (10 ips, 50% duty cycle) with two interruption patterns referenced to word onset: Young listeners with normal hearing for pure tones and older listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Wilson RH; Irish SE
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54(12):933-41. PubMed ID: 26252182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Conflicting and cooperating cues: perception of cues to final consonant voicing by infants and adults.
    Eilers R; Oller DK; Urbano R; Moroff D
    J Speech Hear Res; 1989 Jun; 32(2):307-16. PubMed ID: 2739382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Auditory filter characteristics and consonant recognition for hearing-impaired listeners.
    Dubno JR; Dirks DD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Apr; 85(4):1666-75. PubMed ID: 2708682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Temporal control in the voicing contrast: Evidence from surgery-related apraxia of speech.
    Marczyk A; Machuca MJ
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2018; 32(2):148-165. PubMed ID: 28703648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sensorineural hearing loss and the discrimination of vowel-like stimuli.
    Turner CW; Van Tasell DJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Feb; 75(2):562-5. PubMed ID: 6699294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Speech masking release in listeners with flat hearing loss: effects of masker fluctuation rate on identification scores and phonetic feature reception.
    Lorenzi C; Husson M; Ardoint M; Debruille X
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Sep; 45(9):487-95. PubMed ID: 17005491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.