These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1918632)

  • 21. Recognition of nonsense syllables by hearing-impaired listeners and by noise-masked normal hearers.
    Humes LE; Dirks DD; Bell TS; Kincaid GE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Mar; 81(3):765-73. PubMed ID: 3584685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The Effects of Sensorineural Hearing Impairment on Asynchronous Glimpsing of Speech.
    Ozmeral EJ; Buss E; Hall JW
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(5):e0154920. PubMed ID: 27144601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Speech competition effects on synthetic stop-vowel perception by normal and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Gordon-Salant SM; Wightman FL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 May; 73(5):1756-65. PubMed ID: 6223058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Factors governing speech reception benefits of adaptive linear filtering for listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Rankovic CM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Feb; 103(2):1043-57. PubMed ID: 9479758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Upward spread of masking, hearing loss, and speech recognition in young and elderly listeners.
    Klein AJ; Mills JH; Adkins WY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Mar; 87(3):1266-71. PubMed ID: 2324393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Temporal resolution in sensorineural hearing-impaired listeners.
    Nelson DA; Freyman RL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Mar; 81(3):709-20. PubMed ID: 3584678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Contributions of temporal encodings of voicing, voicelessness, fundamental frequency, and amplitude variation to audio-visual and auditory speech perception.
    Faulkner A; Rosen S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Oct; 106(4 Pt 1):2063-73. PubMed ID: 10530029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Relations between auditory functions in impaired hearing.
    Festen JM; Plomp R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Feb; 73(2):652-62. PubMed ID: 6841805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Additivity of masking in normally hearing and hearing-impaired subjects.
    Oxenham AJ; Moore BC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Oct; 98(4):1921-34. PubMed ID: 7593916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Acoustic and perceptual characteristics of voicing in fricatives and fricative clusters.
    Stevens KN; Blumstein SE; Glicksman L; Burton M; Kurowski K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 May; 91(5):2979-3000. PubMed ID: 1629490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Perception of final fricative voicing: native and nonnative listeners' use of vowel duration.
    Broersma M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Mar; 127(3):1636-44. PubMed ID: 20329862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Identification and discrimination of a synthesized voicing contrast by normal and sensorineural hearing-impaired children.
    Parady S; Dorman MF; Whaley P; Raphael LJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1981 Mar; 69(3):783-90. PubMed ID: 7240559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Susceptibility to intraspeech spread of masking in listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Hannley M; Dorman MF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Jul; 74(1):40-51. PubMed ID: 6886197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effect of audibility on spatial release from speech-on-speech masking.
    Glyde H; Buchholz JM; Nielsen L; Best V; Dillon H; Cameron S; Hickson L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Nov; 138(5):3311-9. PubMed ID: 26627803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Associations among frequency and temporal resolution and consonant recognition for hearing-impaired listeners.
    Dubno JR; Dirks DD
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990; 469():23-9. PubMed ID: 2356732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Dissimilarity ratings of English consonants by normally-hearing and hearing-impaired individuals.
    Danhauer JL; Lawarre RM
    J Speech Hear Res; 1979 Jun; 22(2):236-46. PubMed ID: 491553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Speech-cue enhancement for the hearing impaired: amplification of burst/murmur cues for improved perception of final stop voicing.
    Revoile SG; Holden-Pitt L; Edward D; Pickett JM; Brandt F
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987; 24(4):207-16. PubMed ID: 3430378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Growth of low-pass masking of pure tones and speech for hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners.
    Dubno JR; Ahlstrom JB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Dec; 98(6):3113-24. PubMed ID: 8550937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Audibility-index predictions of normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners' performance on the connected speech test.
    Sherbecoe RL; Studebaker GA
    Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1):71-88. PubMed ID: 12598814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Consonant-feature transmission as a function of presentation level in hearing-impaired listeners.
    Gutnick HN
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1982 Oct; 72(4):1124-30. PubMed ID: 7142577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.