These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19186901)

  • 1. When do fair procedures not matter? A test of the identity violation effect.
    Mayer DM; Greenbaum RL; Kuenzi M; Shteynberg G
    J Appl Psychol; 2009 Jan; 94(1):142-61. PubMed ID: 19186901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Substitutes for procedural fairness: prototypical leaders are endorsed whether they are fair or not.
    Ullrich J; Christ O; van Dick R
    J Appl Psychol; 2009 Jan; 94(1):235-44. PubMed ID: 19186908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A four-component model of procedural justice: defining the meaning of a "fair" process.
    Blader SL; Tyler TR
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2003 Jun; 29(6):747-58. PubMed ID: 15189630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Justice and organizational citizenship behavior intentions: fair rewards versus fair treatment.
    Williams S; Pitre R; Zainuba M
    J Soc Psychol; 2002 Feb; 142(1):33-44. PubMed ID: 11913833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Does the justice of the one interact with the justice of the many? Reactions to procedural justice in teams.
    Colquitt JA
    J Appl Psychol; 2004 Aug; 89(4):633-46. PubMed ID: 15327350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Procedural justice as autonomy regulation.
    van Prooijen JW
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2009 Jun; 96(6):1166-80. PubMed ID: 19469594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Promoting employee wellbeing: the relevance of work characteristics and organizational justice.
    Lawson KJ; Noblet AJ; Rodwell JJ
    Health Promot Int; 2009 Sep; 24(3):223-33. PubMed ID: 19596657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Exploring the psychological underpinnings of the moral mandate effect: motivated reasoning, group differentiation, or anger?
    Mullen E; Skitka LJ
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2006 Apr; 90(4):629-43. PubMed ID: 16649859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Realpolitik versus fair process: moderating effects of group identification on acceptance of political decisions.
    Leung K; Tong KK; Lind EA
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2007 Mar; 92(3):476-89. PubMed ID: 17352604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Testing and extending the group engagement model: linkages between social identity, procedural justice, economic outcomes, and extrarole behavior.
    Blader SL; Tyler TR
    J Appl Psychol; 2009 Mar; 94(2):445-64. PubMed ID: 19271800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Voice in political decision-making: the effect of group voice on perceived trustworthiness of decision makers and subsequent acceptance of decisions.
    Terwel BW; Harinck F; Ellemers N; Daamen DD
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2010 Jun; 16(2):173-86. PubMed ID: 20565202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perceiving expatriate coworkers as foreigners encourages aid: social categorization and procedural justice together improve intergroup cooperation and dual identity.
    Leonardelli GJ; Toh SM
    Psychol Sci; 2011 Jan; 22(1):110-7. PubMed ID: 21148458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The influence of national culture on the perceived fairness of grading procedures: a comparison of the United States and China.
    Tata J
    J Psychol; 2005 Sep; 139(5):401-12. PubMed ID: 16285211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Procedural justice and the hedonic principle: how approach versus avoidance motivation influences the psychology of voice.
    van Prooijen JW; Karremans JC; van Beest I
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2006 Oct; 91(4):686-97. PubMed ID: 17014293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fair today, fair tomorrow? A longitudinal investigation of overall justice perceptions.
    Holtz BC; Harold CM
    J Appl Psychol; 2009 Sep; 94(5):1185-99. PubMed ID: 19702364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Productivity and employees' organizational justice perceptions in long-term care for the elderly.
    Heponiemi T; Elovainio M; Laine J; Pekkarinen L; Eccles M; Noro A; Finne-Soveri H; Sinervo T
    Res Nurs Health; 2007 Oct; 30(5):498-507. PubMed ID: 17893931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The role of overall justice judgments in organizational justice research: a test of mediation.
    Ambrose ML; Schminke M
    J Appl Psychol; 2009 Mar; 94(2):491-500. PubMed ID: 19271803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Distributive justice, procedural justice, and psychological distress: the moderating effect of coworker support and work autonomy.
    Rousseau V; Salek S; Aubé C; Morin EM
    J Occup Health Psychol; 2009 Jul; 14(3):305-17. PubMed ID: 19586224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of role and gender on the use of distributive versus procedural justice principles.
    Tata J
    J Psychol; 2000 May; 134(3):261-8. PubMed ID: 10907704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effects of overhearing peers discuss an authority's fairness reputation on reactions to subsequent treatment.
    Jones DA; Skarlicki DP
    J Appl Psychol; 2005 Mar; 90(2):363-72. PubMed ID: 15769244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.