These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19186928)

  • 21. Mood-induced shifts in attentional bias to emotional information predict ill- and well-being.
    Cavanagh SR; Urry HL; Shin LM
    Emotion; 2011 Apr; 11(2):241-8. PubMed ID: 21500893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Tagging multiple emotional stimuli: negative valence has little benefit.
    Watson DG; Blagrove E
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Jun; 38(3):785-803. PubMed ID: 22201468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Look before you regulate: differential perceptual strategies underlying expressive suppression and cognitive reappraisal.
    Bebko GM; Franconeri SL; Ochsner KN; Chiao JY
    Emotion; 2011 Aug; 11(4):732-42. PubMed ID: 21707159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. When do additional distractors reduce the attentional blink?
    Kawahara J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Aug; 35(4):1043-61. PubMed ID: 19653748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Amygdala responses to positively and negatively valenced baby faces in healthy female volunteers: influences of individual differences in harm avoidance.
    Baeken C; De Raedt R; Ramsey N; Van Schuerbeek P; Hermes D; Bossuyt A; Leyman L; Vanderhasselt MA; De Mey J; Luypaert R
    Brain Res; 2009 Nov; 1296():94-103. PubMed ID: 19679112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Attentional distraction reduces the affective but not the sensory dimension of perceived dyspnea.
    von Leupoldt A; Seemann N; Gugleva T; Dahme B
    Respir Med; 2007 Apr; 101(4):839-44. PubMed ID: 16971103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Distractibility in infancy: the effects of distractor characteristics and type of attention.
    Tellinghuisen DJ; Oakes LM
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1997 Feb; 64(2):232-54. PubMed ID: 9120382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Conditioning-induced attentional bias for face stimuli measured with the emotional Stroop task.
    Lee TH; Lim SL; Lee K; Kim HT; Choi JS
    Emotion; 2009 Feb; 9(1):134-9. PubMed ID: 19186927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Examining information processing biases in spider phobia using the rapid serial visual presentation paradigm.
    Cisler JM; Ries BJ; Widner RL
    J Anxiety Disord; 2007; 21(8):977-90. PubMed ID: 17275254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Blinded by emotion: target misses follow attention capture by arousing distractors in RSVP.
    Arnell KM; Killman KV; Fijavz D
    Emotion; 2007 Aug; 7(3):465-77. PubMed ID: 17683203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Reward elicits cognitive control over emotional distraction: Evidence from pupillometry.
    Walsh AT; Carmel D; Grimshaw GM
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2019 Jun; 19(3):537-554. PubMed ID: 30488225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Emotional valence and arousal interact in attentional control.
    Jefferies LN; Smilek D; Eich E; Enns JT
    Psychol Sci; 2008 Mar; 19(3):290-5. PubMed ID: 18315803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Time-course of attentional bias for pain-related cues in chronic daily headache sufferers.
    Liossi C; Schoth DE; Bradley BP; Mogg K
    Eur J Pain; 2009 Oct; 13(9):963-9. PubMed ID: 19071045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Visual search across the life span.
    Hommel B; Li KZ; Li SC
    Dev Psychol; 2004 Jul; 40(4):545-58. PubMed ID: 15238042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Beyond amygdala: Default Mode Network activity differs between patients with social phobia and healthy controls.
    Gentili C; Ricciardi E; Gobbini MI; Santarelli MF; Haxby JV; Pietrini P; Guazzelli M
    Brain Res Bull; 2009 Aug; 79(6):409-13. PubMed ID: 19559343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [The attentional blink effect: influence of negative words in an affective valence categorization task].
    Vaquero JM; Frese B; Lupiáñez J; Megías JL; Acosta A
    Psicothema; 2006 Aug; 18(3):525-30. PubMed ID: 17296082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The remains of the trial: goal-determined inter-trial suppression of selective attention.
    Lleras A; Levinthal BR; Kawahara J
    Prog Brain Res; 2009; 176():195-213. PubMed ID: 19733758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Attentional selection is biased toward mood-congruent stimuli.
    Becker MW; Leinenger M
    Emotion; 2011 Oct; 11(5):1248-54. PubMed ID: 21604872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Distractibility with advancing age and Parkinson's disease.
    Machado L; Devine A; Wyatt N
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Jun; 47(7):1756-64. PubMed ID: 19397871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Attentional effects of negative faces: top-down contingent or involuntary?
    Horstmann G; Becker SI
    Percept Psychophys; 2008 Nov; 70(8):1416-34. PubMed ID: 19064487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.