129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19187502)
1. Evaluation of the effectiveness of commercially available contact plates for monitoring microbial environments.
Pinto F; Hiom S; Girdlestone S; Maillard JY
Lett Appl Microbiol; 2009 Mar; 48(3):379-82. PubMed ID: 19187502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Problems associated with traditional hygiene swabbing: the need for in-house standardization.
Moore G; Griffith C
J Appl Microbiol; 2007 Oct; 103(4):1090-103. PubMed ID: 17897214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An evaluation of different methods for the recovery of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from environmental surfaces.
Obee P; Griffith CJ; Cooper RA; Bennion NE
J Hosp Infect; 2007 Jan; 65(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 17140698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Possible influence of surfactants and proteins on the efficiency of contact agar microbiological surface sampling.
Deckers SM; Sindic M; Anceau C; Brostaux Y; Detry JG
J Food Prot; 2010 Nov; 73(11):2116-22. PubMed ID: 21219728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of different methods to recover meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from hospital environmental surfaces.
Dolan A; Bartlett M; McEntee B; Creamer E; Humphreys H
J Hosp Infect; 2011 Nov; 79(3):227-30. PubMed ID: 21742414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of 3M Petrifilm environmental Listeria plates against standard enrichment methods for the detection of Listeria monocytogenes of epidemiological significance from environmental surfaces.
Nyachuba DG; Donnelly CW
J Food Sci; 2007 Nov; 72(9):M346-54. PubMed ID: 18034727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of laser and environmental parameters on reducing microbial contamination of stainless steel surfaces with Nd:YAG laser irradiation.
Watson IA; Wang RK; Peden I; Ward GD; Stewart-Tull DE; Wardlaw AC
J Appl Microbiol; 2005; 99(4):934-44. PubMed ID: 16162246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. New technique to take samples from environmental surfaces using flocked nylon swabs.
Hedin G; Rynbäck J; Loré B
J Hosp Infect; 2010 Aug; 75(4):314-7. PubMed ID: 20451296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of the Recovery Rate of Different Swabs for Microbial Environmental Monitoring.
Goverde M; Willrodt J; Staerk A
PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2017 1/2; 71(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 27516491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of vacuum filter sock surface sample collection method for Bacillus spores from porous and non-porous surfaces.
Brown GS; Betty RG; Brockmann JE; Lucero DA; Souza CA; Walsh KS; Boucher RM; Tezak MS; Wilson MC
J Environ Monit; 2007 Jul; 9(7):666-71. PubMed ID: 17607386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Design of means for counting allochtonous pathogenic bacteria from natural water].
Borrego JJ
Microbiologia; 1994; 10(1-2):169-80. PubMed ID: 7946120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Adhesion of Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis to the Episkin reconstructed epidermis model and to an inert 304 stainless steel substrate.
Lerebour G; Cupferman S; Bellon-Fontaine MN
J Appl Microbiol; 2004; 97(1):7-16. PubMed ID: 15186437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative performance of contact plates, electrostatic wipes, swabs and a novel sampling device for the detection of Staphylococcus aureus on environmental surfaces.
Lutz JK; Crawford J; Hoet AE; Wilkins JR; Lee J
J Appl Microbiol; 2013 Jul; 115(1):171-8. PubMed ID: 23607553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Scanning CO2 laser bacterial inactivation systems.
Watson I; Yeo CB; Stewart-Tull D
J Appl Microbiol; 2007 Mar; 102(3):766-73. PubMed ID: 17309626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Rapid surface colony counts determination with three new miniaturised techniques.
Malik KA
Zentralbl Bakteriol Orig A; 1977; 237(2-3):415-23. PubMed ID: 322428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of lidocaine gel on povidone-iodine antisepsis and microbial survival.
Boden JH; Myers ML; Lee T; Bushley DM; Torres MF
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Oct; 34(10):1773-5. PubMed ID: 18812132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Development of an innovative method for the evaluation of fungal contamination of surfaces.
Vescia N; D'Alessandro D; Osborn JF; Grillot R
Ann Ig; 2008; 20(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 18478671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Discrepancies in bacterial recovery from dental unit water samples on R2A medium and a commercial sampling device.
Smith RS; Pineiro SA; Singh R; Romberg E; Labib ME; Williams HN
Curr Microbiol; 2004 Apr; 48(4):243-6. PubMed ID: 15057447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of different culture methods on bacterial recovery in hemodialysis fluids.
Punakabutra N; Nunthapisud P; Pisitkun T; Tiranathanagul K; Tungsanga K; Eiam-Ong S
J Med Assoc Thai; 2004 Nov; 87(11):1361-7. PubMed ID: 15825714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative studies of selective media for recovery of Staphylococcus aureus from natural waters.
Borrego JJ; Florido JA; Martínez-Manzanares E; Romero P
J Appl Bacteriol; 1988 Aug; 65(2):153-61. PubMed ID: 3060456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
