These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19188086)

  • 1. Cortical and interfacial bone changes around a non-cemented hip implant: simulations using a combined strain/damage remodelling algorithm.
    Scannell PT; Prendergast PJ
    Med Eng Phys; 2009 May; 31(4):477-88. PubMed ID: 19188086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of material properties of femoral hip components on bone remodeling.
    Weinans H; Huiskes R; Grootenboer HJ
    J Orthop Res; 1992 Nov; 10(6):845-53. PubMed ID: 1403299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bone remodelling inside a cemented resurfaced femoral head.
    Gupta S; New AM; Taylor M
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2006 Jul; 21(6):594-602. PubMed ID: 16542761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Probabilistic analysis of an uncemented total hip replacement.
    Dopico-González C; New AM; Browne M
    Med Eng Phys; 2009 May; 31(4):470-6. PubMed ID: 19217340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The influence of cement mantle thickness and stem geometry on fatigue damage in two different cemented hip femoral prostheses.
    Ramos A; Simões JA
    J Biomech; 2009 Nov; 42(15):2602-10. PubMed ID: 19660758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A numerical study of failure mechanisms in the cemented resurfaced femur: effects of interface characteristics and bone remodelling.
    Pal B; Gupta S; New AM
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2009 May; 223(4):471-84. PubMed ID: 19499837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A finite element analysis of the vibrational behaviour of the intra-operatively manufactured prosthesis-femur system.
    Pastrav LC; Devos J; Van der Perre G; Jaecques SV
    Med Eng Phys; 2009 May; 31(4):489-94. PubMed ID: 19136292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of three-dimensional shape optimization on the probabilistic response of a cemented femoral hip prosthesis.
    Nicolella DP; Thacker BH; Katoozian H; Davy DT
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(7):1265-78. PubMed ID: 15961093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A method of quantification of stress shielding in the proximal femur using hierarchical computational modeling.
    Be'ery-Lipperman M; Gefen A
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2006 Feb; 9(1):35-44. PubMed ID: 16880155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of periprosthetic bone remodelling after implantation of anatomic and straight stem prostheses in total hip arthroplasty.
    Grochola LF; Habermann B; Mastrodomenico N; Kurth A
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2008 Apr; 128(4):383-92. PubMed ID: 18038142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The relationship between stress shielding and bone resorption around total hip stems and the effects of flexible materials.
    Huiskes R; Weinans H; van Rietbergen B
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1992 Jan; (274):124-34. PubMed ID: 1728998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cementless implant composition and femoral stress. A finite element analysis.
    Namba RS; Keyak JH; Kim AS; Vu LP; Skinner HB
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1998 Feb; (347):261-7. PubMed ID: 9520899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Computer simulation on fatigue behavior of cemented hip prostheses: a physiological model.
    Hung JP; Chen JH; Chiang HL; Wu JS
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2004 Nov; 76(2):103-13. PubMed ID: 15451160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Strain adaptive bone remodelling: influence of the implantation technique.
    Behrens BA; Bouguecha A; Nolte I; Meyer-Lindenberg A; Stukenborg-Colsman C; Pressel T
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 133():33-44. PubMed ID: 18376011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Influence on load transfer of different femoral neck endoprostheses].
    Steinhauser E; Ellenrieder M; Gruber G; Busch R; Gradinger R; Mittelmeier W
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2006; 144(4):386-93. PubMed ID: 16941296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biomechanics of the Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
    Ong KL; Kurtz SM; Manley MT; Rushton N; Mohammed NA; Field RE
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2006 Aug; 88(8):1110-5. PubMed ID: 16877617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The various stress patterns of press-fit, ingrown, and cemented femoral stems.
    Huiskes R
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1990 Dec; (261):27-38. PubMed ID: 2245558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of the change in stem length on the load transfer and bone remodelling for a cemented resurfaced femur.
    Pal B; Gupta S; New AM
    J Biomech; 2010 Nov; 43(15):2908-14. PubMed ID: 20728891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of Charnley hip neck-angle inclination on the stresses at stem/cement and bone/cement interfaces.
    Zaki M; Saad F; Al-Ebiary MN
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2002; 12(4):411-21. PubMed ID: 12652035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Probabilistic finite element analysis of the uncemented hip replacement--effect of femur characteristics and implant design geometry.
    Dopico-González C; New AM; Browne M
    J Biomech; 2010 Feb; 43(3):512-20. PubMed ID: 19896129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.