413 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19188317)
21. Clinical management of small (6- to 9-mm) polyps detected at screening CT colonography: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Pickhardt PJ; Hassan C; Laghi A; Zullo A; Kim DH; Iafrate F; Morini S
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Nov; 191(5):1509-16. PubMed ID: 18941093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Computer-Aided Detection of Colorectal Polyps at CT Colonography: Prospective Clinical Performance and Third-Party Reimbursement.
Ziemlewicz TJ; Kim DH; Hinshaw JL; Lubner MG; Robbins JB; Pickhardt PJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Jun; 208(6):1244-1248. PubMed ID: 28753031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Computer-aided detection of colorectal polyps: can it improve sensitivity of less-experienced readers? Preliminary findings.
Baker ME; Bogoni L; Obuchowski NA; Dass C; Kendzierski RM; Remer EM; Einstein DM; Cathier P; Jerebko A; Lakare S; Blum A; Caroline DF; Macari M
Radiology; 2007 Oct; 245(1):140-9. PubMed ID: 17885187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparative effectiveness of screening strategies for colorectal cancer.
Barzi A; Lenz HJ; Quinn DI; Sadeghi S
Cancer; 2017 May; 123(9):1516-1527. PubMed ID: 28117881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Computer-aided detection (CAD) as a second reader using perspective filet view at CT colonography: effect on performance of inexperienced readers.
Fisichella VA; Jäderling F; Horvath S; Stotzer PO; Kilander A; Båth M; Hellström M
Clin Radiol; 2009 Oct; 64(10):972-82. PubMed ID: 19748002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Performance of a previously validated CT colonography computer-aided detection system in a new patient population.
Summers RM; Handwerker LR; Pickhardt PJ; Van Uitert RL; Deshpande KK; Yeshwant S; Yao J; Franaszek M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Jul; 191(1):168-74. PubMed ID: 18562741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Computed tomographic colonography: assessment of radiologist performance with and without computer-aided detection.
Halligan S; Altman DG; Mallett S; Taylor SA; Burling D; Roddie M; Honeyfield L; McQuillan J; Amin H; Dehmeshki J
Gastroenterology; 2006 Dec; 131(6):1690-9. PubMed ID: 17087934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Cost-effectiveness of screening for colorectal cancer in the general population.
Frazier AL; Colditz GA; Fuchs CS; Kuntz KM
JAMA; 2000 Oct; 284(15):1954-61. PubMed ID: 11035892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. An international review of the main cost-effectiveness drivers of virtual colonography versus conventional colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening: is the tide changing due to adherence?
Kriza C; Emmert M; Wahlster P; Niederländer C; Kolominsky-Rabas P
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Nov; 82(11):e629-36. PubMed ID: 23938237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Medicare cost of colorectal cancer screening: CT colonography vs. optical colonoscopy.
Pyenson B; Pickhardt PJ; Sawhney TG; Berrios M
Abdom Imaging; 2015 Oct; 40(8):2966-76. PubMed ID: 26350285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening colonoscopy vs. sigmoidoscopy and alternative strategies.
Sharaf RN; Ladabaum U
Am J Gastroenterol; 2013 Jan; 108(1):120-32. PubMed ID: 23247579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A literature review of assumptions on test characteristics and adherence in economic evaluations of colonoscopy and CT-colonography screening.
van Gils P; van den Berg M; van Kranen H; de Wit AG
Eur J Cancer; 2009 Jun; 45(9):1554-9. PubMed ID: 19261464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Computer-aided diagnosis for CT colonography.
Yoshida H; Dachman AH
Semin Ultrasound CT MR; 2004 Oct; 25(5):419-31. PubMed ID: 15559125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Colonic polyps: complementary role of computer-aided detection in CT colonography.
Summers RM; Jerebko AK; Franaszek M; Malley JD; Johnson CD
Radiology; 2002 Nov; 225(2):391-9. PubMed ID: 12409571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening with computed tomography colonography according to a polyp size threshold for polypectomy.
Heresbach D; Chauvin P; Hess-Migliorretti A; Riou F; Grolier J; Josselin JM
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2010 Jun; 22(6):716-23. PubMed ID: 19574924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Diagnostic Performance and Patient Acceptance of Reduced-Laxative CT Colonography for the Detection of Polypoid and Non-Polypoid Neoplasms: A Multicenter Prospective Trial.
Utano K; Nagata K; Honda T; Mitsushima T; Yasuda T; Kato T; Horita S; Asano M; Oda N; Majima K; Kawamura Y; Hirayama M; Watanabe N; Kanazawa H; Lefor AK; Sugimoto H
Radiology; 2017 Feb; 282(2):399-407. PubMed ID: 27580426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Colorectal neoplasia screening with virtual colonoscopy: when, at what cost, and with what national impact?
Ladabaum U; Song K; Fendrick AM
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2004 Jul; 2(7):554-63. PubMed ID: 15224279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Cost-effectiveness modeling of colorectal cancer: computed tomography colonography vs colonoscopy or fecal occult blood tests.
Lucidarme O; Cadi M; Berger G; Taieb J; Poynard T; Grenier P; Beresniak A
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Jul; 81(7):1413-9. PubMed ID: 21444171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Cost-effectiveness analysis on screening for colorectal neoplasm and management of colorectal cancer in Asia.
Tsoi KK; Ng SS; Leung MC; Sung JJ
Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2008 Aug; 28(3):353-63. PubMed ID: 18638075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The potential of imaging techniques as a screening tool for colorectal cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Greuter MJ; Berkhof J; Fijneman RJ; Demirel E; Lew JB; Meijer GA; Stoker J; Coupé VM
Br J Radiol; 2016 Jul; 89(1063):20150910. PubMed ID: 27194458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
