These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
591 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19188758)
1. In vitro irritation models and immune reactions. Gibbs S Skin Pharmacol Physiol; 2009; 22(2):103-13. PubMed ID: 19188758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Irritant contact dermatitis. Part II. Evaluation evaluation of skin irritation potential of chemicals]. Chomiczewska D; Kieć-Swierczyńska M; Krecisz B Med Pr; 2009; 60(3):209-14. PubMed ID: 19746889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Progress on the development of human in vitro dendritic cell based assays for assessment of the sensitizing potential of a compound. dos Santos GG; Reinders J; Ouwehand K; Rustemeyer T; Scheper RJ; Gibbs S Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2009 May; 236(3):372-82. PubMed ID: 19232364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In vitro skin irritation: facts and future. State of the art review of mechanisms and models. Welss T; Basketter DA; Schröder KR Toxicol In Vitro; 2004 Jun; 18(3):231-43. PubMed ID: 15046769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A tiered approach to the use of alternatives to animal testing for the safety assessment of cosmetics: skin irritation. Macfarlane M; Jones P; Goebel C; Dufour E; Rowland J; Araki D; Costabel-Farkas M; Hewitt NJ; Hibatallah J; Kirst A; McNamee P; Schellauf F; Scheel J Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2009 Jul; 54(2):188-96. PubMed ID: 19393278 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Development of a sensitive test method to evaluate mechanical irritation potential on mucosal skin. Farage MA; Meyer S; Walter D Skin Res Technol; 2004 May; 10(2):85-95. PubMed ID: 15059175 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The usefulness of toxicogenomics for predicting acute skin irritation on in vitro reconstructed human epidermis. Borlon C; Godard P; Eskes C; Hartung T; Zuang V; Toussaint O Toxicology; 2007 Nov; 241(3):157-66. PubMed ID: 17928126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Skin irritation and sensitization: mechanisms and new approaches for risk assessment. 1. Skin irritation. Fluhr JW; Darlenski R; Angelova-Fischer I; Tsankov N; Basketter D Skin Pharmacol Physiol; 2008; 21(3):124-35. PubMed ID: 18523410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Determination of skin irritation potential in the human 4-h patch test. Basketter DA; York M; McFadden JP; Robinson MK Contact Dermatitis; 2004 Jul; 51(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 15291823 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Rat epidermal keratinocyte organotypic culture (ROC) as a model for chemically induced skin irritation testing. Pappinen S; Pasonen-Seppänen S; Suhonen M; Tammi R; Urtti A Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2005 Nov; 208(3):233-41. PubMed ID: 16239167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of modifications of the traditional patch test in assessing the chemical irritation potential of feminine hygiene products. Farage MA; Meyer S; Walter D Skin Res Technol; 2004 May; 10(2):73-84. PubMed ID: 15059174 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Read-across to rank skin sensitization potential: subcategories for the Michael acceptor domain. Schultz TW; Rogers K; Aptula AO Contact Dermatitis; 2009 Jan; 60(1):21-31. PubMed ID: 19125718 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Irritant contact dermatitis. Part III. Non-invasive methods to assess biophysical properties of the skin]. Chomiczewska D; Kieć-Swierczyńska M; Krecisz B Med Pr; 2010; 61(4):457-66. PubMed ID: 20865858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Harmonization of thresholds for primary skin irritation from results of human repeated insult patch tests and laboratory animal skin irritation tests. Tardiff RG; Hubner RP; Graves CG J Appl Toxicol; 2003; 23(4):279-81. PubMed ID: 12884413 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Are we reaching the limits or our ability to detect skin effects with our current testing and measuring methods for consumer products? Farage MA Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Jun; 52(6):297-303. PubMed ID: 15932577 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Development of an in vitro corrosion/irritation prediction assay using the EpiDerm skin model. Kidd DA; Johnson M; Clements J Toxicol In Vitro; 2007 Oct; 21(7):1292-7. PubMed ID: 17936572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Irritants in combination with a synergistic or additive effect on the skin response: an overview of tandem irritation studies. Kartono F; Maibach HI Contact Dermatitis; 2006 Jun; 54(6):303-12. PubMed ID: 16787451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In vitro and in vivo comparison of dermal irritancy of jet fuel exposure using EpiDerm (EPI-200) cultured human skin and hairless rats. Chatterjee A; Babu RJ; Klausner M; Singh M Toxicol Lett; 2006 Dec; 167(2):85-94. PubMed ID: 17049765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of eye and skin irritation of arginine-derivative surfactants using different in vitro endpoints as alternatives to the in vivo assays. Martinez V; Corsini E; Mitjans M; Pinazo A; Vinardell MP Toxicol Lett; 2006 Jul; 164(3):259-67. PubMed ID: 16472949 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]