These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

506 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19188786)

  • 1. Evaluation of suspicious nipple discharge by magnetic resonance mammography based on breast imaging reporting and data system magnetic resonance imaging descriptors.
    Tokuda Y; Kuriyama K; Nakamoto A; Choi S; Yutani K; Kunitomi Y; Haneda T; Kawai M; Masuda N; Takeda M; Nakamura H
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009; 33(1):58-62. PubMed ID: 19188786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Categorization of non-mass-like breast lesions detected by MRI.
    Sakamoto N; Tozaki M; Higa K; Tsunoda Y; Ogawa T; Abe S; Ozaki S; Sakamoto M; Tsuruhara T; Kawano N; Suzuki T; Yamashiro N; Fukuma E
    Breast Cancer; 2008; 15(3):241-6. PubMed ID: 18224381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Characterization of breast lesions with CE-MR multimodal morphological and kinetic analysis: comparison with conventional mammography and high-resolution ultrasound.
    Vassiou K; Kanavou T; Vlychou M; Poultsidi A; Athanasiou E; Arvanitis DL; Fezoulidis IV
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Apr; 70(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 18295425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Chemical shift MRI: is there any contribution to morphologic evaluation of solid breast masses?
    Gokalp G; Topal U; Bolca N; Ercan I
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Oct; 16(10):1263-71. PubMed ID: 19608436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Malignancy rates of non-masslike enhancement on breast magnetic resonance imaging using American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System descriptors.
    Wilhelm A; McDonough MD; DePeri ER
    Breast J; 2012; 18(6):523-6. PubMed ID: 23009294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Evaluation of suspicious nipple discharge with MRI: review of 50 cases].
    Boisserie-Lacroix M; Adenet C; Trillaud H
    J Radiol; 2011 May; 92(5):412-20. PubMed ID: 21621107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The challenge of imaging dense breast parenchyma: is magnetic resonance mammography the technique of choice? A comparative study with x-ray mammography and whole-breast ultrasound.
    Pediconi F; Catalano C; Roselli A; Dominelli V; Cagioli S; Karatasiou A; Pronio A; Kirchin MA; Passariello R
    Invest Radiol; 2009 Jul; 44(7):412-21. PubMed ID: 19448554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Breast MRI using the VIBE sequence: clustered ring enhancement in the differential diagnosis of lesions showing non-masslike enhancement.
    Tozaki M; Igarashi T; Fukuda K
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Aug; 187(2):313-21. PubMed ID: 16861532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Enhanced mass on contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging: Lesion characterization using combination of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR images.
    Yabuuchi H; Matsuo Y; Okafuji T; Kamitani T; Soeda H; Setoguchi T; Sakai S; Hatakenaka M; Kubo M; Sadanaga N; Yamamoto H; Honda H
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Nov; 28(5):1157-65. PubMed ID: 18972357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical MR-mammography: are computer-assisted methods superior to visual or manual measurements for curve type analysis? A systematic approach.
    Baltzer PA; Freiberg C; Beger S; Vag T; Dietzel M; Herzog AB; Gajda M; Camara O; Kaiser WA
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Sep; 16(9):1070-6. PubMed ID: 19523854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Application of classification trees for the qualitative differentiation of focal liver lesions suspicious for metastasis in gadolinium-EOB-DTPA-enhanced liver MR imaging.
    Schelhorn J; Benndorf M; Dietzel M; Burmeister HP; Kaiser WA; Baltzer PA
    Rofo; 2012 Sep; 184(9):788-94. PubMed ID: 22618476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pattern recognition system for the discrimination of multiple sclerosis from cerebral microangiopathy lesions based on texture analysis of magnetic resonance images.
    Theocharakis P; Glotsos D; Kalatzis I; Kostopoulos S; Georgiadis P; Sifaki K; Tsakouridou K; Malamas M; Delibasis G; Cavouras D; Nikiforidis G
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Apr; 27(3):417-22. PubMed ID: 18786795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A combined high temporal and high spatial resolution 3 Tesla MR imaging protocol for the assessment of breast lesions: initial results.
    Pinker K; Grabner G; Bogner W; Gruber S; Szomolanyi P; Trattnig S; Heinz-Peer G; Weber M; Fitzal F; Pluschnig U; Rudas M; Helbich T
    Invest Radiol; 2009 Sep; 44(9):553-8. PubMed ID: 19652611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Breast MRI: Are T2 IR sequences useful in the evaluation of breast lesions?
    Ballesio L; Savelli S; Angeletti M; Porfiri LM; D'Ambrosio I; Maggi C; Castro ED; Bennati P; Fanelli GP; Vestri AR; Manganaro L
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Jul; 71(1):96-101. PubMed ID: 18479866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Angle between 1 and 4 min gives the most significant difference in time-intensity curves between benign disease and breast cancer: analysis of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging in 103 patients with breast lesions.
    Hara M; Watanabe T; Okumura A; Kato K; Mohri N; Ishikawa M; Mizuno A; Takeyama H
    Clin Imaging; 2009; 33(5):335-42. PubMed ID: 19712811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Application of computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) in MR-mammography (MRM): do we really need whole lesion time curve distribution analysis?
    Baltzer PA; Renz DM; Kullnig PE; Gajda M; Camara O; Kaiser WA
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Apr; 16(4):435-42. PubMed ID: 19268855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of the three-time-point method for diagnosis of breast lesions in contrast-enhanced MR mammography.
    Hauth EA; Stockamp C; Maderwald S; Mühler A; Kimmig R; Jaeger H; Barkhausen J; Forsting M
    Clin Imaging; 2006; 30(3):160-5. PubMed ID: 16632149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fat suppression with spectrally selective inversion vs. high spectral and spatial resolution MRI of breast lesions: qualitative and quantitative comparisons.
    Fan X; Abe H; Medved M; Foxley S; Arkani S; Zamora MA; Olopade OI; Newstead GM; Karczmar GS
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Dec; 24(6):1311-5. PubMed ID: 17096393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pathologic correlates of false positive breast magnetic resonance imaging findings: which lesions warrant biopsy?
    Langer SA; Horst KC; Ikeda DM; Daniel BL; Kong CS; Dirbas FM
    Am J Surg; 2005 Oct; 190(4):633-40. PubMed ID: 16164938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantitative 2- and 3-dimensional analysis of pharmacokinetic model-derived variables for breast lesions in dynamic, contrast-enhanced MR mammography.
    Hauth EA; Jaeger HJ; Maderwald S; Muehler A; Kimmig R; Forsting M
    Eur J Radiol; 2008 May; 66(2):300-8. PubMed ID: 17658235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.