168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19189296)
1. Feasibility of concurrent dual contrast enhancement using CEST contrast agents and superparamagnetic iron oxide particles.
Gilad AA; van Laarhoven HW; McMahon MT; Walczak P; Heerschap A; Neeman M; van Zijl PC; Bulte JW
Magn Reson Med; 2009 Apr; 61(4):970-4. PubMed ID: 19189296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Concurrent Dual-Contrast Enhancement Using Fe
Hu F; Wang D; Ma X; Hu T; Yue Y; Tang W; Wu P; Tong T; Peng W
ACS Omega; 2023 Jul; 8(27):24153-24164. PubMed ID: 37457473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A new contrast in MR mammography by means of chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) imaging at 3 Tesla: preliminary results.
Schmitt B; Zamecnik P; Zaiss M; Rerich E; Schuster L; Bachert P; Schlemmer HP
Rofo; 2011 Nov; 183(11):1030-6. PubMed ID: 22034086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Using two chemical exchange saturation transfer magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents for molecular imaging studies.
Ali MM; Liu G; Shah T; Flask CA; Pagel MD
Acc Chem Res; 2009 Jul; 42(7):915-24. PubMed ID: 19514717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Magnetic resonance imaging of single SPIO labeled mesenchymal stem cells at 3 Tesla].
Peldschus K; Kaul M; Lange C; Nolte-Ernsting C; Adam G; Ittrich H
Rofo; 2007 May; 179(5):473-9. PubMed ID: 17436181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Determination of an optimally sensitive and specific chemical exchange saturation transfer MRI quantification metric in relevant biological phantoms.
Ray KJ; Larkin JR; Tee YK; Khrapitchev AA; Karunanithy G; Barber M; Baldwin AJ; Chappell MA; Sibson NR
NMR Biomed; 2016 Nov; 29(11):1624-1633. PubMed ID: 27686882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A review of optimization and quantification techniques for chemical exchange saturation transfer MRI toward sensitive in vivo imaging.
Kim J; Wu Y; Guo Y; Zheng H; Sun PZ
Contrast Media Mol Imaging; 2015; 10(3):163-178. PubMed ID: 25641791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Labeling of mesenchymal stem cells with different superparamagnetic particles of iron oxide and detectability with MRI at 3T].
Ittrich H; Lange C; Dahnke H; Zander AR; Adam G; Nolte-Ernsting C
Rofo; 2005 Aug; 177(8):1151-63. PubMed ID: 16021549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ytterbium-based PARACEST agent: feasibility of CEST imaging on a clinical MR scanner.
Takayama Y; Yoshiura T; Nishie A; Nakayama T; Hatakenaka M; Kato N; Yoshise S; Keupp J; Burdinski D; Honda H
Magn Reson Med Sci; 2012; 11(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 22450385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A new class of cubic SPIONs as a dual-mode T1 and T2 contrast agent for MRI.
Alipour A; Soran-Erdem Z; Utkur M; Sharma VK; Algin O; Saritas EU; Demir HV
Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Jun; 49():16-24. PubMed ID: 28958878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantitative description of radiofrequency (RF) power-based ratiometric chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) pH imaging.
Wu R; Longo DL; Aime S; Sun PZ
NMR Biomed; 2015 May; 28(5):555-65. PubMed ID: 25807919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Simulation, phantom validation, and clinical evaluation of fast pH-weighted molecular imaging using amine chemical exchange saturation transfer echo planar imaging (CEST-EPI) in glioma at 3 T.
Harris RJ; Cloughesy TF; Liau LM; Nghiemphu PL; Lai A; Pope WB; Ellingson BM
NMR Biomed; 2016 Nov; 29(11):1563-1576. PubMed ID: 27717216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ultrashort T2* relaxometry for quantitation of highly concentrated superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO) nanoparticle labeled cells.
Liu W; Dahnke H; Rahmer J; Jordan EK; Frank JA
Magn Reson Med; 2009 Apr; 61(4):761-6. PubMed ID: 19191285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Systematic Evaluation of Amide Proton Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer at 3 T: Effects of Protein Concentration, pH, and Acquisition Parameters.
Schmidt H; Schwenzer NF; Gatidis S; Küstner T; Nikolaou K; Schick F; Martirosian P
Invest Radiol; 2016 Oct; 51(10):635-46. PubMed ID: 27272542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticle-embedded encapsulated microbubbles as dual contrast agents of magnetic resonance and ultrasound imaging.
Yang F; Li Y; Chen Z; Zhang Y; Wu J; Gu N
Biomaterials; 2009 Aug; 30(23-24):3882-90. PubMed ID: 19395082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. NMR relaxation and magnetic properties of superparamagnetic nanoworms.
Gossuin Y; Disch S; Vuong QL; Gillis P; Hermann RP; Park JH; Sailor MJ
Contrast Media Mol Imaging; 2010; 5(6):318-22. PubMed ID: 21190269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of iron oxide particles (AMI 227) with a gadolinium complex (Gd-DOTA) in dynamic susceptibility contrast MR imagings (FLASH and EPI) for both phantom and rat brain at 1.5 Tesla.
Loubeyre P; De Jaegere T; Bosmans H; Miao Y; Ni Y; Landuyt W; Marchal G
J Magn Reson Imaging; 1999 Mar; 9(3):447-53. PubMed ID: 10194716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Flow-enhanced off-resonance saturation for remote detection of iron-based contrast agents.
Krämer P; Helluy X; Kampf T; Lang E; Jakob PM
Magn Reson Med; 2010 Jun; 63(6):1708-15. PubMed ID: 20512876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Discrimination of benign and malignant lymph nodes at 7.0T compared to 1.5T magnetic resonance imaging using ultrasmall particles of iron oxide: a feasibility preclinical study.
Kinner S; Maderwald S; Albert J; Parohl N; Corot C; Robert P; Baba HA; Barkhausen J
Acad Radiol; 2013 Dec; 20(12):1604-9. PubMed ID: 24200489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Screening CEST contrast agents using ultrafast CEST imaging.
Xu X; Yadav NN; Song X; McMahon MT; Jerschow A; van Zijl PC; Xu J
J Magn Reson; 2016 Apr; 265():224-9. PubMed ID: 26969814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]