These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19190431)

  • 1. Current trends in spinal arthroplasty: an assessment of surgeon practices and attitudes regarding cervical and lumbar disk replacement.
    Whang PG; Simpson AK; Rechtine G; Grauer JN
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Feb; 22(1):26-33. PubMed ID: 19190431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Postoperative bracing after spine surgery for degenerative conditions: a questionnaire study.
    Bible JE; Biswas D; Whang PG; Simpson AK; Rechtine GR; Grauer JN
    Spine J; 2009 Apr; 9(4):309-16. PubMed ID: 18790685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Incidence of contraindications to total disc arthroplasty: a retrospective review of 100 consecutive fusion patients with a specific analysis of facet arthrosis.
    Wong DA; Annesser B; Birney T; Lamond R; Kumar A; Johnson S; Jatana S; Ghiselli G
    Spine J; 2007; 7(1):5-11. PubMed ID: 17197326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Survey of spine surgeons on attitudes regarding osteoporosis and osteomalacia screening and treatment for fractures, fusion surgery, and pseudoarthrosis.
    Dipaola CP; Bible JE; Biswas D; Dipaola M; Grauer JN; Rechtine GR
    Spine J; 2009 Jul; 9(7):537-44. PubMed ID: 19328744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Surgeons agree to disagree on surgical options for degenerative conditions of the cervical and lumbar spine.
    Lee JY; Hohl JB; Fedorka CJ; Devin C; Brodke DS; Branch CL; Vaccaro AR
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Feb; 36(3):E203-12. PubMed ID: 21192301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Magnetic resonance imaging clarity of the Bryan, Prodisc-C, Prestige LP, and PCM cervical arthroplasty devices.
    Sekhon LH; Duggal N; Lynch JJ; Haid RW; Heller JG; Riew KD; Seex K; Anderson PA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Mar; 32(6):673-80. PubMed ID: 17413473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The indications for lumbar and cervical disc replacement.
    McAfee PC
    Spine J; 2004; 4(6 Suppl):177S-181S. PubMed ID: 15541664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Implant design may influence delayed heterotopic ossification after total disk arthroplasty in lumbar spine.
    Kerr EJ; Jawahar A; Kay S; Cavanaugh DA; Nunley PD
    Surg Neurol; 2009 Dec; 72(6):747-51; discussion 751. PubMed ID: 20082839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fusion versus disk replacement for degenerative conditions of the lumbar and cervical spine: quid est testimonium?
    Kishen TJ; Diwan AD
    Orthop Clin North Am; 2010 Apr; 41(2):167-81. PubMed ID: 20399356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Surgeon practices regarding postoperative thromboembolic prophylaxis after high-risk spinal surgery.
    Glotzbecker MP; Bono CM; Harris MB; Brick G; Heary RF; Wood KB
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Dec; 33(26):2915-21. PubMed ID: 19092624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The prevalence of indications and contraindications to cervical total disc replacement.
    Auerbach JD; Jones KJ; Fras CI; Balderston JR; Rushton SA; Chin KR
    Spine J; 2008; 8(5):711-6. PubMed ID: 17983843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Total disc arthroplasty does not affect the incidence of adjacent segment degeneration in cervical spine: results of 93 patients in three prospective randomized clinical trials.
    Jawahar A; Cavanaugh DA; Kerr EJ; Birdsong EM; Nunley PD
    Spine J; 2010 Dec; 10(12):1043-8. PubMed ID: 20869326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Lumbar spinal fusion versus anterior lumbar disc replacement: the financial implications.
    Patel VV; Estes S; Lindley EM; Burger E
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Oct; 21(7):473-6. PubMed ID: 18836357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Minimizing ferromagnetic artefact with metallic lumbar total disc arthroplasty devices at adjacent segments: technical note.
    Marshman LA; Strong G; Trewhella M; Kasis A; Friesem T
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Jan; 35(2):252-6. PubMed ID: 20081522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cervical and lumbar MRI findings in aviators as a function of aircraft type.
    Landau DA; Chapnick L; Yoffe N; Azaria B; Goldstein L; Atar E
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2006 Nov; 77(11):1158-61. PubMed ID: 17086770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical survey: patterns of utilization of lumbar epidural steroid injections by a cohort of spinal surgeons.
    Lebude B; Wang D; Harrop JS; Maltenfort M; Anderson DG; Vaccaro AR; Ratliff JK
    PM R; 2009 Apr; 1(4):329-34. PubMed ID: 19627915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prevalence of lumbar total disc replacement candidates in a community-based spinal surgery practice.
    Fras CI; Auerbach JD
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Apr; 21(2):126-9. PubMed ID: 18391718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessing the potential impact of total disc arthroplasty on surgeon practice patterns in North America.
    Singh K; Vaccaro AR; Albert TJ
    Spine J; 2004; 4(6 Suppl):195S-201S. PubMed ID: 15541667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. General considerations for cervical arthroplasty with technique for ProDisc-C.
    Chi JH; Ames CP; Tay B
    Neurosurg Clin N Am; 2005 Oct; 16(4):609-19, vi. PubMed ID: 16326284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Financial incentives for lumbar surgery: a critical analysis of physician reimbursement for decompression and fusion procedures.
    Whang PG; Lim MR; Sasso RC; Skelton A; Brown ZB; Greg Anderson D; Albert TJ; Hilibrand AS; Vaccaro AR
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Aug; 21(6):381-6. PubMed ID: 18679090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.