378 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19190924)
1. A new distractable implant for vertebral body replacement: biomechanical testing of four implants for the thoracolumbar spine.
Reinhold M; Schmoelz W; Canto F; Krappinger D; Blauth M; Knop C
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2009 Oct; 129(10):1375-82. PubMed ID: 19190924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [An improved vertebral body replacement for the thoracolumbar spine. A biomechanical in vitro test on human lumbar vertebral bodies].
Reinhold M; Schmölz W; Canto F; Krappinger D; Blauth M; Knop C
Unfallchirurg; 2007 Apr; 110(4):327-33. PubMed ID: 17211598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Replacement of the vertebral body with an expansion implant (Synex)].
Krbec M; Stulík J; Tichý V
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2002; 69(3):158-62. PubMed ID: 12125217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanical compression tests with a new implant for thoracolumbar vertebral body replacement.
Knop C; Lange U; Bastian L; Oeser M; Blauth M
Eur Spine J; 2001 Feb; 10(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 11276833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Comparative biomechanical compression trials with a new vertebral prosthetic implant].
Knop C; Lange U; Bastian L; Oeser M; Blauth M
Unfallchirurg; 2001 Jan; 104(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 11381759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Two in vivo surgical approaches for lumbar corpectomy using allograft and a metallic implant: a controlled clinical and biomechanical study.
Huang P; Gupta MC; Sarigul-Klijn N; Hazelwood S
Spine J; 2006; 6(6):648-58. PubMed ID: 17088195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of screw positioning in a new anterior spine fixator on implant loosening in osteoporotic vertebrae.
Reinhold M; Schwieger K; Goldhahn J; Linke B; Knop C; Blauth M
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Feb; 31(4):406-13. PubMed ID: 16481950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of implant size and device keel on vertebral compression properties in lumbar total disc replacement.
Auerbach JD; Ballester CM; Hammond F; Carine ET; Balderston RA; Elliott DM
Spine J; 2010 Apr; 10(4):333-40. PubMed ID: 20362251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prospective multicenter study with a new implant for thoracolumbar vertebral body replacement.
Lange U; Knop C; Bastian L; Blauth M
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2003 Jun; 123(5):203-8. PubMed ID: 12712359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical comparison of expandable cages for vertebral body replacement in the thoracolumbar spine.
Pflugmacher R; Schleicher P; Schaefer J; Scholz M; Ludwig K; Khodadadyan-Klostermann C; Haas NP; Kandziora F
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Jul; 29(13):1413-9. PubMed ID: 15223931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Biomechanical stability with a new artificial vertebral body implant. 3-dimensional movement analysis of instrumented human vertebral segments].
Knop C; Lange U; Bastian L; Blauth M
Unfallchirurg; 2001 Oct; 104(10):984-97. PubMed ID: 11699309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Vertebral body replacement with a Synex implant].
Zeman J; Matĕjka J; Belatka J; Vodicka J
Rozhl Chir; 2007 May; 86(5):263-7. PubMed ID: 17634016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A titanium expandable pedicle screw improves initial pullout strength as compared with standard pedicle screws.
Vishnubhotla S; McGarry WB; Mahar AT; Gelb DE
Spine J; 2011 Aug; 11(8):777-81. PubMed ID: 21802996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Three-dimensional motion analysis with Synex. Comparative biomechanical test series with a new vertebral body replacement for the thoracolumbar spine.
Knop C; Lange U; Bastian L; Blauth M
Eur Spine J; 2000 Dec; 9(6):472-85. PubMed ID: 11189915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Anterior fixation in the osteoporotic spine: cut-out and pullout characteristics of implants.
Ferguson SJ; Winkler F; Nolte LP
Eur Spine J; 2002 Dec; 11(6):527-34. PubMed ID: 12522709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The invention of new anterior spinal instrumentation prototype: a structural analysis of KKU expandable cage.
Sae-Jung S; Jirarattanaphochai K; Saengnipanthkul S
J Med Assoc Thai; 2007 Aug; 90(8):1621-6. PubMed ID: 17926993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Axial compressive strength of thoraco-lumbar vertebrae--an experimental biomechanical study].
Konermann W; Stubbe F; Link T; Meier N
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1999; 137(3):223-31. PubMed ID: 10441827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. In vitro fixator rod loading after transforaminal compared to anterior lumbar interbody fusion.
Kettler A; Niemeyer T; Issler L; Merk U; Mahalingam M; Werner K; Claes L; Wilke HJ
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Jun; 21(5):435-42. PubMed ID: 16442678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of allograft bone and titanium cages for vertebral body replacement in the thoracolumbar spine: a biomechanical study.
Cardenas RJ; Javalkar V; Patil S; Gonzalez-Cruz J; Ogden A; Mukherjee D; Nanda A
Neurosurgery; 2010 Jun; 66(6 Suppl Operative):314-8; discussion 318. PubMed ID: 20489522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Resistance of the lumbar spine against axial compression forces after implantation of three different posterior lumbar interbody cages.
Krammer M; Dietl R; Lumenta CB; Kettler A; Wilke HJ; Büttner A; Claes L
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2001 Dec; 143(12):1217-22. PubMed ID: 11810385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
