These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

285 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19191194)

  • 21. Genetic variability in the dopamine system (dopamine receptor D4, catechol-O-methyltransferase) modulates neurophysiological responses to gains and losses.
    Marco-Pallarés J; Cucurell D; Cunillera T; Krämer UM; Càmara E; Nager W; Bauer P; Schüle R; Schöls L; Münte TF; Rodriguez-Fornells A
    Biol Psychiatry; 2009 Jul; 66(2):154-61. PubMed ID: 19251248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The impact of social comparison on the neural substrates of reward processing: an event-related potential study.
    Qiu J; Yu C; Li H; Jou J; Tu S; Wang T; Wei D; Zhang Q
    Neuroimage; 2010 Jan; 49(1):956-62. PubMed ID: 19695331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. To bet or not to bet? The coding of bets modulates brain potentials in outcome evaluations.
    Liu Y; Dou K; Wang Y; Li J
    Neuroreport; 2015 Nov; 26(16):958-65. PubMed ID: 26379060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Feedback-related negativity reflects omission of monetary gains: Evidence from ERP gambling study.
    Yaple Z; Shestakova A; Klucharev V
    Neurosci Lett; 2018 Nov; 686():145-149. PubMed ID: 30195974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Brain responses to outcomes of one's own and other's performance in a gambling task.
    Yu R; Zhou X
    Neuroreport; 2006 Nov; 17(16):1747-51. PubMed ID: 17047466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Action co-representation is tuned to other humans.
    Tsai CC; Kuo WJ; Hung DL; Tzeng OJ
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Nov; 20(11):2015-24. PubMed ID: 18416679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Self-report and behavioral measures of reward sensitivity predict the feedback negativity.
    Bress JN; Hajcak G
    Psychophysiology; 2013 Jul; 50(7):610-6. PubMed ID: 23656631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Self-relevant criteria determine the evaluation of outcomes induced by others.
    Itagaki S; Katayama J
    Neuroreport; 2008 Feb; 19(3):383-7. PubMed ID: 18303586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Learning-related changes in reward expectancy are reflected in the feedback-related negativity.
    Bellebaum C; Daum I
    Eur J Neurosci; 2008 Apr; 27(7):1823-35. PubMed ID: 18380674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Sensitivity of electrophysiological activity from medial frontal cortex to utilitarian and performance feedback.
    Nieuwenhuis S; Yeung N; Holroyd CB; Schurger A; Cohen JD
    Cereb Cortex; 2004 Jul; 14(7):741-7. PubMed ID: 15054053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effects of invalid feedback on learning and feedback-related brain activity in decision-making.
    Ernst B; Steinhauser M
    Brain Cogn; 2015 Oct; 99():78-86. PubMed ID: 26263382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. P3a and mismatch negativity in individuals with moderate Intermittent Explosive Disorder.
    Koelsch S
    Neurosci Lett; 2009 Aug; 460(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 19463896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. How friendly is a little friendly competition? Evidence of self-interest and empathy during outcome evaluation.
    Wang Y; Yuan B; Roberts K; Wang Y; Lin C; Simons RF
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2014 Mar; 91(3):155-62. PubMed ID: 24149211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Allocation of attention to self-name and self-face: An ERP study.
    Tacikowski P; Nowicka A
    Biol Psychol; 2010 May; 84(2):318-24. PubMed ID: 20298741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Neural correlates of feedback processing in obsessive-compulsive disorder.
    Endrass T; Koehne S; Riesel A; Kathmann N
    J Abnorm Psychol; 2013 May; 122(2):387-96. PubMed ID: 23421527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Electrophysiological correlates of categorization: P300 amplitude as index of target similarity.
    Azizian A; Freitas AL; Watson TD; Squires NK
    Biol Psychol; 2006 Mar; 71(3):278-88. PubMed ID: 16043279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Baseline EEG theta/beta ratio and punishment sensitivity as biomarkers for feedback-related negativity (FRN) and risk-taking.
    Massar SA; Rossi V; Schutter DJ; Kenemans JL
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2012 Oct; 123(10):1958-65. PubMed ID: 22542439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Transient and sustained ERP activity related to feedback processing in the probabilistic selection task.
    West R; Bailey K; Anderson S
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Apr; 126():1-12. PubMed ID: 29499240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Congruency of auditory sounds and visual letters modulates mismatch negativity and P300 event-related potentials.
    Andres AJ; Oram Cardy JE; Joanisse MF
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2011 Feb; 79(2):137-46. PubMed ID: 20888870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Medial frontal negativity reflects learning from positive feedback.
    Van Der Helden J; Boksem MA
    Psychophysiology; 2012 Aug; 49(8):1109-13. PubMed ID: 22725655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.