These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
602 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19191796)
1. Effect of abutment's height and framework alloy on the load distribution of mandibular cantilevered implant-supported prosthesis. Suedam V; Souza EA; Moura MS; Jacques LB; Rubo JH Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Feb; 20(2):196-200. PubMed ID: 19191796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of cantilever length and framework alloy on the stress distribution of mandibular-cantilevered implant-supported prostheses. Jacques LB; Moura MS; Suedam V; Souza EA; Rubo JH Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jul; 20(7):737-41. PubMed ID: 19489929 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Deformation of implant abutments after framework connection using strain gauges. Hollweg H; Jacques LB; da Silva Moura M; Bianco VC; Souza EA; Rubo JH J Oral Implantol; 2012 Apr; 38(2):125-32. PubMed ID: 22568468 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In vitro vertical misfit evaluation of cast frameworks for cement-retained implant-supported partial prostheses. Oyagüe RC; Turrión AS; Toledano M; Monticelli F; Osorio R J Dent; 2009 Jan; 37(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 18951675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of cantilever length and alloy framework on the stress distribution in peri-implant area of cantilevered implant-supported fixed partial dentures. Suedam V; Moretti Neto RT; Sousa EA; Rubo JH J Appl Oral Sci; 2016 Apr; 24(2):114-20. PubMed ID: 27119758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Finite element analysis of stress in bone adjacent to dental implants. Rubo JH; Souza EA J Oral Implantol; 2008; 34(5):248-55. PubMed ID: 19170290 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of engaging abutment position in implant-borne, screw-retained three-unit fixed cantilevered prostheses. Dogus SM; Kurtz KS; Watanabe I; Griggs JA J Prosthodont; 2011 Jul; 20(5):348-54. PubMed ID: 21585587 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomechanical effects of two different collar implant structures on stress distribution under cantilever fixed partial dentures. Merıç G; Erkmen E; Kurt A; Eser A; özden AU Acta Odontol Scand; 2011 Nov; 69(6):374-84. PubMed ID: 21449688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of framework soldering on the deformation of implant abutments after framework seating: a study with strain gauges. Mendes Sde N; Edwards Rezende CE; Moretti Neto RT; Capello Sousa EA; Henrique Rubo J Implant Dent; 2013 Apr; 22(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 23442599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. On cobalt-chrome frameworks in implant dentistry. Hjalmarsson L Swed Dent J Suppl; 2009; (201):3-83. PubMed ID: 20143574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An in vitro load evaluation of a conical implant system with 2 abutment designs and 3 different retaining-screw alloys. Erneklint C; Odman P; Ortengren U; Karlsson S Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(5):733-7. PubMed ID: 17066634 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of provisional restoration type on micromovement of implants. Holst S; Geiselhoeringer H; Wichmann M; Holst AI J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Sep; 100(3):173-82. PubMed ID: 18762029 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanical comparison of axial and tilted implants for mandibular full-arch fixed prostheses. Kim KS; Kim YL; Bae JM; Cho HW Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):976-84. PubMed ID: 22010079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Implant abutment deformation during prosthetic cylinder screw tightening: an in vitro study. Neto RT; Moura MS; Souza EA; Rubo JH Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(4):391-5. PubMed ID: 19639078 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Finite element analysis study of the effect of superstructure material on stress distribution in an implant-supported fixed prosthesis. Sertgöz A Int J Prosthodont; 1997; 10(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 9484066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cyclic loading of implant-supported prostheses: changes in component fit over time. Hecker DM; Eckert SE J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Apr; 89(4):346-51. PubMed ID: 12690346 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Finite-element analysis of stress on dental implant prosthesis. Rubo JH; Capello Souza EA Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2010 Jun; 12(2):105-13. PubMed ID: 19220846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dynamic fatigue properties of the dental implant-abutment interface: joint opening in wide-diameter versus standard-diameter hex-type implants. Hoyer SA; Stanford CM; Buranadham S; Fridrich T; Wagner J; Gratton D J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jun; 85(6):599-607. PubMed ID: 11404760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of the passivity between cast alloy and laser-welded titanium overdenture bars. Paiva J; Givan DA; Broome JC; Lemons JE; McCracken MS J Prosthodont; 2009 Dec; 18(8):656-62. PubMed ID: 19682220 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cyclic loading of implant-supported prostheses: comparison of gaps at the prosthetic-abutment interface when cycled abutments are replaced with as-manufactured abutments. Hecker DM; Eckert SE; Choi YG J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jan; 95(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 16399272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]