These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19192182)

  • 1. Statistical hypothesis testing in intraspecific phylogeography: nested clade phylogeographical analysis vs. approximate Bayesian computation.
    Templeton AR
    Mol Ecol; 2009 Jan; 18(2):319-31. PubMed ID: 19192182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Statistical phylogeography: methods of evaluating and minimizing inference errors.
    Templeton AR
    Mol Ecol; 2004 Apr; 13(4):789-809. PubMed ID: 15012756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluating nested clade phylogeographic analysis under models of restricted gene flow.
    Panchal M; Beaumont MA
    Syst Biol; 2010 Jul; 59(4):415-32. PubMed ID: 20547778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The automation and evaluation of nested clade phylogeographic analysis.
    Panchal M; Beaumont MA
    Evolution; 2007 Jun; 61(6):1466-80. PubMed ID: 17542853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Why does a method that fails continue to be used? The answer.
    Templeton AR
    Evolution; 2009 Apr; 63(4):807-12. PubMed ID: 19335340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In defence of model-based inference in phylogeography.
    Beaumont MA; Nielsen R; Robert C; Hey J; Gaggiotti O; Knowles L; Estoup A; Panchal M; Corander J; Hickerson M; Sisson SA; Fagundes N; Chikhi L; Beerli P; Vitalis R; Cornuet JM; Huelsenbeck J; Foll M; Yang Z; Rousset F; Balding D; Excoffier L
    Mol Ecol; 2010 Feb; 19(3):436-446. PubMed ID: 29284924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fossorial but widespread: the phylogeography of the common spadefoot toad (Pelobates fuscus), and the role of the Po Valley as a major source of genetic variability.
    Crottini A; Andreone F; Kosuch J; Borkin LJ; Litvinchuk SN; Eggert C; Veith M
    Mol Ecol; 2007 Jul; 16(13):2734-54. PubMed ID: 17594444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Approximate bayesian computation without summary statistics: the case of admixture.
    Sousa VC; Fritz M; Beaumont MA; Chikhi L
    Genetics; 2009 Apr; 181(4):1507-19. PubMed ID: 19189952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. AABC: approximate approximate Bayesian computation for inference in population-genetic models.
    Buzbas EO; Rosenberg NA
    Theor Popul Biol; 2015 Feb; 99():31-42. PubMed ID: 25261426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Approximate Bayesian computation (ABC) gives exact results under the assumption of model error.
    Wilkinson RD
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2013 May; 12(2):129-41. PubMed ID: 23652634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Approximate Bayesian computation with functional statistics.
    Soubeyrand S; Carpentier F; Guiton F; Klein EK
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2013 Mar; 12(1):17-37. PubMed ID: 23446870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Approximate Bayesian computation.
    Sunnåker M; Busetto AG; Numminen E; Corander J; Foll M; Dessimoz C
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2013; 9(1):e1002803. PubMed ID: 23341757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Approximate Bayesian Computation for infectious disease modelling.
    Minter A; Retkute R
    Epidemics; 2019 Dec; 29():100368. PubMed ID: 31563466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fundamentals and Recent Developments in Approximate Bayesian Computation.
    Lintusaari J; Gutmann MU; Dutta R; Kaski S; Corander J
    Syst Biol; 2017 Jan; 66(1):e66-e82. PubMed ID: 28175922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Coherent and incoherent inference in phylogeography and human evolution.
    Templeton AR
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2010 Apr; 107(14):6376-81. PubMed ID: 20308555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Lack of confidence in approximate Bayesian computation model choice.
    Robert CP; Cornuet JM; Marin JM; Pillai NS
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2011 Sep; 108(37):15112-7. PubMed ID: 21876135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The coup de grâce for the nested clade phylogeographic analysis?
    Petit RJ
    Mol Ecol; 2008 Jan; 17(2):516-8. PubMed ID: 17956540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Testing nested phylogenetic and phylogeographic hypotheses in the Plethodon vandykei species group.
    Carstens BC; Stevenson AL; Degenhardt JD; Sullivan J
    Syst Biol; 2004 Oct; 53(5):781-92. PubMed ID: 15545255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Taking error into account when fitting models using Approximate Bayesian Computation.
    van der Vaart E; Prangle D; Sibly RM
    Ecol Appl; 2018 Mar; 28(2):267-274. PubMed ID: 29178336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Deciphering the Routes of invasion of Drosophila suzukii by Means of ABC Random Forest.
    Fraimout A; Debat V; Fellous S; Hufbauer RA; Foucaud J; Pudlo P; Marin JM; Price DK; Cattel J; Chen X; Deprá M; François Duyck P; Guedot C; Kenis M; Kimura MT; Loeb G; Loiseau A; Martinez-Sañudo I; Pascual M; Polihronakis Richmond M; Shearer P; Singh N; Tamura K; Xuéreb A; Zhang J; Estoup A
    Mol Biol Evol; 2017 Apr; 34(4):980-996. PubMed ID: 28122970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.