These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19192330)

  • 1. Adoption of information technology in primary care physician offices in New Zealand and Denmark, Part 3: Medical record environment comparisons.
    Protti D; Bowden T; Johansen I
    Inform Prim Care; 2008; 16(4):285-90. PubMed ID: 19192330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Adoption of information technology in primary care physician offices in New Zealand and Denmark, Part 4: Benefits comparisons.
    Protti D; Bowden T; Johansen I
    Inform Prim Care; 2008; 16(4):291-6. PubMed ID: 19192331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Adoption of information technology in primary care physician offices in New Zealand and Denmark, part 5: final comparisons.
    Protti D; Bowden T; Johansen I
    Inform Prim Care; 2009; 17(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 19490769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Adoption of information technology in primary care physician offices in New Zealand and Denmark, part 1: healthcare system comparisons.
    Protti D; Bowden T; Johansen I
    Inform Prim Care; 2008; 16(3):183-7. PubMed ID: 19094404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Adoption of information technology in primary care physician offices in New Zealand and Denmark, part 2: historical comparisons.
    Protti D; Bowden T; Johansen I
    Inform Prim Care; 2008; 16(3):189-93. PubMed ID: 19094405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Adoption of information technology in primary care physician offices in Alberta and Denmark, Part 1: Historical, technical and cultural forces.
    Protti D; Edworthy S; Johansen I
    Healthc Q; 2007; 10(3):95-102, 4. PubMed ID: 17626551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Primary care computing in England and Scotland: a comparison with Denmark.
    Protti D; Wright G; Treweek S; Johansen I
    Inform Prim Care; 2006; 14(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 17059698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparing the application of Health Information Technology in primary care in Denmark and Andalucía, Spain.
    Protti D; Johansen I; Perez-Torres F
    Int J Med Inform; 2009 Apr; 78(4):270-83. PubMed ID: 18819836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Widespread adoption of information technology in primary care physician offices in Denmark: a case study.
    Protti D; Johansen I
    Issue Brief (Commonw Fund); 2010 Mar; 80():1-14. PubMed ID: 20232528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Electronic medical record use by office-based physicians and their practices: United States, 2007.
    Hing E; Hsiao CJ
    Natl Health Stat Report; 2010 Mar; (23):1-11. PubMed ID: 20632518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Patient panel of underserved populations and adoption of electronic medical record systems by office-based physicians.
    Li C; West-Strum D
    Health Serv Res; 2010 Aug; 45(4):963-84. PubMed ID: 20403062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Introduction of an electronic medical record system into physician practice offices: why is it so #%!&-ing hard for everybody?--Part III.
    Lyons JP; Klasko S
    J Med Pract Manage; 2011; 27(1):36-9. PubMed ID: 21936429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The urge to merge. Implementing a physician office EMR and integrating it with a hospital EHR.
    Schneck LH
    MGMA Connex; 2007 Feb; 7(2):21-2. PubMed ID: 17345941
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Drivers of electronic medical record adoption among medical groups.
    Simon JS; Rundall TG; Shortell SM
    Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf; 2005 Nov; 31(11):631-9. PubMed ID: 16335064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Electronic medical record use by office-based physicians and their practices: United States, 2006.
    Hing ES; Burt CW; Woodwell DA
    Adv Data; 2007 Oct; (393):1-7. PubMed ID: 18019786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Primary care physicians' use of an electronic medical record system: a cognitive task analysis.
    Shachak A; Hadas-Dayagi M; Ziv A; Reis S
    J Gen Intern Med; 2009 Mar; 24(3):341-8. PubMed ID: 19130148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Use of electronic medical records by ambulatory care providers: United States, 2006.
    Hing E; Hall MJ; Ashman JJ
    Natl Health Stat Report; 2010 Apr; (22):1-21. PubMed ID: 20806827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Introduction of an electronic medical record system into physician practice offices: why is it so #%!&-ing hard for everybody?-Part I.
    Lyons JP; Klasko S
    J Med Pract Manage; 2011; 26(5):317-22. PubMed ID: 21595389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Canada lags US in adoption of e-prescribing.
    Eggertson L
    CMAJ; 2009 Apr; 180(9):E25-6. PubMed ID: 19398727
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ceiling effect in EMR system assimilation: a multiple case study in primary care family practices.
    Trudel MC; Marsan J; Paré G; Raymond L; Ortiz de Guinea A; Maillet É; Micheneau T
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2017 Apr; 17(1):46. PubMed ID: 28427405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.