These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
715 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19192835)
1. Ceramic inlays and partial ceramic crowns: influence of remaining cusp wall thickness on the marginal integrity and enamel crack formation in vitro. Krifka S; Anthofer T; Fritzsch M; Hiller KA; Schmalz G; Federlin M Oper Dent; 2009; 34(1):32-42. PubMed ID: 19192835 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Partial ceramic crowns: influence of ceramic thickness, preparation design and luting material on fracture resistance and marginal integrity in vitro. Federlin M; Krifka S; Herpich M; Hiller KA; Schmalz G Oper Dent; 2007; 32(3):251-60. PubMed ID: 17555176 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Partial ceramic crowns: influence of preparation design and luting material on internal adaptation. Federlin M; Schmidt S; Hiller KA; Thonemann B; Schmalz G Oper Dent; 2004; 29(5):560-70. PubMed ID: 15470879 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Marginal integrity of partial ceramic crowns within dentin with different luting techniques and materials. Schenke F; Hiller KA; Schmalz G; Federlin M Oper Dent; 2008; 33(5):516-25. PubMed ID: 18833858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of different cusp coverage methods for the extension of ceramic inlays on marginal integrity and enamel crack formation in vitro. Krifka S; Stangl M; Wiesbauer S; Hiller KA; Schmalz G; Federlin M Clin Oral Investig; 2009 Sep; 13(3):333-41. PubMed ID: 19137332 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Microleakage of all-ceramic crowns using self-etching resin luting agents. Trajtenberg CP; Caram SJ; Kiat-amnuay S Oper Dent; 2008; 33(4):392-9. PubMed ID: 18666496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Microleakage of ceramic inlays luted with different resin cements and dentin adhesives. Uludag B; Ozturk O; Ozturk AN J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Oct; 102(4):235-41. PubMed ID: 19782826 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Analysis of marginal adaptation and sealing to enamel and dentin of four self-adhesive resin cements. Aschenbrenner CM; Lang R; Handel G; Behr M Clin Oral Investig; 2012 Feb; 16(1):191-200. PubMed ID: 21327799 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dentin bond strengths of two ceramic inlay systems after cementation with three different techniques and one bonding system. Ozturk N; Aykent F J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):275-81. PubMed ID: 12644803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of tissue characteristics at margins on leakage of Class II indirect porcelain restorations. Ferrari M; Mason PN; Fabianelli A; Cagidiaco MC; Kugel G; Davidson CL Am J Dent; 1999 Jun; 12(3):134-42. PubMed ID: 10649936 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Marginal adaptation of heat-pressed glass-ceramic veneers to Class 3 composite restorations in vitro. Christgau M; Friedl KH; Schmalz G; Edelmann K Oper Dent; 1999; 24(4):233-44. PubMed ID: 10823069 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Marginal adaptation of heat-pressed glass-ceramic veneers to dentin in vitro. Christgau M; Friedl KH; Schmalz G; Resch U Oper Dent; 1999; 24(3):137-46. PubMed ID: 10530275 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Partial ceramic crowns. Influence of preparation design and luting material on margin integrity--a scanning electron microscopic study. Federlin M; Sipos C; Hiller KA; Thonemann B; Schmalz G Clin Oral Investig; 2005 Mar; 9(1):8-17. PubMed ID: 15309565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Luting of ceramic inlays in vitro: marginal quality of self-etch and etch-and-rinse adhesives versus self-etch cements. Frankenberger R; Lohbauer U; Schaible RB; Nikolaenko SA; Naumann M Dent Mater; 2008 Feb; 24(2):185-91. PubMed ID: 17544101 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Marginal adaptation of dentin bonded ceramic inlays: effects of bonding systems and luting resin composites. Haller B; Hässner K; Moll K Oper Dent; 2003; 28(5):574-84. PubMed ID: 14531604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Chairside vs. labside ceramic inlays: effect of temporary restoration and adhesive luting on enamel cracks and marginal integrity. Frankenberger R; Krämer N; Appelt A; Lohbauer U; Naumann M; Roggendorf MJ Dent Mater; 2011 Sep; 27(9):892-8. PubMed ID: 21708404 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of cement type on the marginal adaptation of all-ceramic MOD inlays. Rosentritt M; Behr M; Lang R; Handel G Dent Mater; 2004 Jun; 20(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 15081553 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of resin cement viscosity on microleakage of ceramic inlays. Hahn P; Attin T; Gröfke M; Hellwig E Dent Mater; 2001 May; 17(3):191-6. PubMed ID: 11257290 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars. Dejak B; Mlotkowski A J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 18262014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]