718 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19192835)
1. Ceramic inlays and partial ceramic crowns: influence of remaining cusp wall thickness on the marginal integrity and enamel crack formation in vitro.
Krifka S; Anthofer T; Fritzsch M; Hiller KA; Schmalz G; Federlin M
Oper Dent; 2009; 34(1):32-42. PubMed ID: 19192835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Partial ceramic crowns: influence of ceramic thickness, preparation design and luting material on fracture resistance and marginal integrity in vitro.
Federlin M; Krifka S; Herpich M; Hiller KA; Schmalz G
Oper Dent; 2007; 32(3):251-60. PubMed ID: 17555176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Partial ceramic crowns: influence of preparation design and luting material on internal adaptation.
Federlin M; Schmidt S; Hiller KA; Thonemann B; Schmalz G
Oper Dent; 2004; 29(5):560-70. PubMed ID: 15470879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Marginal integrity of partial ceramic crowns within dentin with different luting techniques and materials.
Schenke F; Hiller KA; Schmalz G; Federlin M
Oper Dent; 2008; 33(5):516-25. PubMed ID: 18833858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of different cusp coverage methods for the extension of ceramic inlays on marginal integrity and enamel crack formation in vitro.
Krifka S; Stangl M; Wiesbauer S; Hiller KA; Schmalz G; Federlin M
Clin Oral Investig; 2009 Sep; 13(3):333-41. PubMed ID: 19137332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Microleakage of all-ceramic crowns using self-etching resin luting agents.
Trajtenberg CP; Caram SJ; Kiat-amnuay S
Oper Dent; 2008; 33(4):392-9. PubMed ID: 18666496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Microleakage of ceramic inlays luted with different resin cements and dentin adhesives.
Uludag B; Ozturk O; Ozturk AN
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Oct; 102(4):235-41. PubMed ID: 19782826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Analysis of marginal adaptation and sealing to enamel and dentin of four self-adhesive resin cements.
Aschenbrenner CM; Lang R; Handel G; Behr M
Clin Oral Investig; 2012 Feb; 16(1):191-200. PubMed ID: 21327799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dentin bond strengths of two ceramic inlay systems after cementation with three different techniques and one bonding system.
Ozturk N; Aykent F
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):275-81. PubMed ID: 12644803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of tissue characteristics at margins on leakage of Class II indirect porcelain restorations.
Ferrari M; Mason PN; Fabianelli A; Cagidiaco MC; Kugel G; Davidson CL
Am J Dent; 1999 Jun; 12(3):134-42. PubMed ID: 10649936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Marginal adaptation of heat-pressed glass-ceramic veneers to Class 3 composite restorations in vitro.
Christgau M; Friedl KH; Schmalz G; Edelmann K
Oper Dent; 1999; 24(4):233-44. PubMed ID: 10823069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with CAD/CAM ceramic inlays.
Hannig C; Westphal C; Becker K; Attin T
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Oct; 94(4):342-9. PubMed ID: 16198171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Marginal adaptation of heat-pressed glass-ceramic veneers to dentin in vitro.
Christgau M; Friedl KH; Schmalz G; Resch U
Oper Dent; 1999; 24(3):137-46. PubMed ID: 10530275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Partial ceramic crowns. Influence of preparation design and luting material on margin integrity--a scanning electron microscopic study.
Federlin M; Sipos C; Hiller KA; Thonemann B; Schmalz G
Clin Oral Investig; 2005 Mar; 9(1):8-17. PubMed ID: 15309565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Luting of ceramic inlays in vitro: marginal quality of self-etch and etch-and-rinse adhesives versus self-etch cements.
Frankenberger R; Lohbauer U; Schaible RB; Nikolaenko SA; Naumann M
Dent Mater; 2008 Feb; 24(2):185-91. PubMed ID: 17544101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Marginal adaptation of dentin bonded ceramic inlays: effects of bonding systems and luting resin composites.
Haller B; Hässner K; Moll K
Oper Dent; 2003; 28(5):574-84. PubMed ID: 14531604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Chairside vs. labside ceramic inlays: effect of temporary restoration and adhesive luting on enamel cracks and marginal integrity.
Frankenberger R; Krämer N; Appelt A; Lohbauer U; Naumann M; Roggendorf MJ
Dent Mater; 2011 Sep; 27(9):892-8. PubMed ID: 21708404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of cement type on the marginal adaptation of all-ceramic MOD inlays.
Rosentritt M; Behr M; Lang R; Handel G
Dent Mater; 2004 Jun; 20(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 15081553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of resin cement viscosity on microleakage of ceramic inlays.
Hahn P; Attin T; Gröfke M; Hellwig E
Dent Mater; 2001 May; 17(3):191-6. PubMed ID: 11257290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars.
Dejak B; Mlotkowski A
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 18262014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
