295 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19193768)
1. Excitability at the motoneuron pool and motor cortex is specifically modulated in lengthening compared to isometric contractions.
Gruber M; Linnamo V; Strojnik V; Rantalainen T; Avela J
J Neurophysiol; 2009 Apr; 101(4):2030-40. PubMed ID: 19193768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reductions in motoneuron excitability during sustained isometric contractions are dependent on stimulus and contraction intensity.
Brownstein CG; Espeit L; Royer N; Ansdell P; Škarabot J; Souron R; Lapole T; Millet GY
J Neurophysiol; 2021 May; 125(5):1636-1646. PubMed ID: 33788627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Acute Strength Training Increases Responses to Stimulation of Corticospinal Axons.
Nuzzo JL; Barry BK; Gandevia SC; Taylor JL
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2016 Jan; 48(1):139-50. PubMed ID: 26258855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Elbow angle modulates corticospinal excitability to the resting biceps brachii at both spinal and supraspinal levels.
Dongés SC; Taylor JL; Nuzzo JL
Exp Physiol; 2019 Apr; 104(4):546-555. PubMed ID: 30690803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Output of human motoneuron pools to corticospinal inputs during voluntary contractions.
Martin PG; Gandevia SC; Taylor JL
J Neurophysiol; 2006 Jun; 95(6):3512-8. PubMed ID: 16481454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Corticospinal excitability of the biceps brachii is higher during arm cycling than an intensity-matched tonic contraction.
Forman D; Raj A; Button DC; Power KE
J Neurophysiol; 2014 Sep; 112(5):1142-51. PubMed ID: 24899677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reduced corticospinal responses in older compared with younger adults during submaximal isometric, shortening, and lengthening contractions.
Škarabot J; Ansdell P; Brownstein CG; Hicks KM; Howatson G; Goodall S; Durbaba R
J Appl Physiol (1985); 2019 Apr; 126(4):1015-1031. PubMed ID: 30730812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Increases in corticospinal responsiveness during a sustained submaximal plantar flexion.
Hoffman BW; Oya T; Carroll TJ; Cresswell AG
J Appl Physiol (1985); 2009 Jul; 107(1):112-20. PubMed ID: 19443741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Contraction intensity-dependent variations in the responses to brain and corticospinal tract stimulation after a single session of resistance training in men.
Colomer-Poveda D; Romero-Arenas S; Lundbye-Jensen J; Hortobágyi T; Márquez G
J Appl Physiol (1985); 2019 Oct; 127(4):1128-1139. PubMed ID: 31436513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intensity-dependent alterations in the excitability of cortical and spinal projections to the knee extensors during isometric and locomotor exercise.
Weavil JC; Sidhu SK; Mangum TS; Richardson RS; Amann M
Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol; 2015 Jun; 308(12):R998-1007. PubMed ID: 25876651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Spinal contribution to neuromuscular recovery differs between elbow-flexor and knee-extensor muscles after a maximal sustained fatiguing task.
Vernillo G; Temesi J; Martin M; Krüger RL; Millet GY
J Neurophysiol; 2020 Sep; 124(3):763-773. PubMed ID: 32755359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sustained Maximal Voluntary Contractions Elicit Different Neurophysiological Responses in Upper- and Lower-Limb Muscles in Men.
Temesi J; Vernillo G; Martin M; Krüger RL; McNeil CJ; Millet GY
Neuroscience; 2019 Dec; 422():88-98. PubMed ID: 31682821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cortical and spinal modulation of antagonist coactivation during a submaximal fatiguing contraction in humans.
Lévénez M; Garland SJ; Klass M; Duchateau J
J Neurophysiol; 2008 Feb; 99(2):554-63. PubMed ID: 18046002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Muscle length effect on corticospinal excitability during maximal concentric, isometric and eccentric contractions of the knee extensors.
Doguet V; Nosaka K; Guével A; Thickbroom G; Ishimura K; Jubeau M
Exp Physiol; 2017 Nov; 102(11):1513-1523. PubMed ID: 28796385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Asymmetrical modulation of corticospinal excitability in the contracting and resting contralateral wrist flexors during unilateral shortening, lengthening and isometric contractions.
Uematsu A; Obata H; Endoh T; Kitamura T; Hortobágyi T; Nakazawa K; Suzuki S
Exp Brain Res; 2010 Sep; 206(1):59-69. PubMed ID: 20730420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effects of forearm position and contraction intensity on cortical and spinal excitability during a submaximal force steadiness task of the elbow flexors.
Yacyshyn AF; Kuzyk S; Jakobi JM; McNeil CJ
J Neurophysiol; 2020 Feb; 123(2):522-528. PubMed ID: 31774348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Corticospinal excitability during shortening and lengthening actions with incremental torque output.
Škarabot J; Tallent J; Goodall S; Durbaba R; Howatson G
Exp Physiol; 2018 Dec; 103(12):1586-1592. PubMed ID: 30286253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Group III and IV muscle afferents differentially affect the motor cortex and motoneurones in humans.
Martin PG; Weerakkody N; Gandevia SC; Taylor JL
J Physiol; 2008 Mar; 586(5):1277-89. PubMed ID: 17884925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Corticospinal-evoked responses in lower limb muscles during voluntary contractions at varying strengths.
Oya T; Hoffman BW; Cresswell AG
J Appl Physiol (1985); 2008 Nov; 105(5):1527-32. PubMed ID: 18787089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Muscle length and joint angle influence spinal but not corticospinal excitability to the biceps brachii across forearm postures.
Forman DA; Abdel-Malek D; Bunce CMF; Holmes MWR
J Neurophysiol; 2019 Jul; 122(1):413-423. PubMed ID: 31116661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
