164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1919403)
1. The effects of Canal Master, Flex-R, and K-Flex instrumentation on root canal configuration.
Leseberg DA; Montgomery S
J Endod; 1991 Feb; 17(2):59-65. PubMed ID: 1919403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An evaluation of the Canal Master, balanced force, and step-back techniques.
Hankins PJ; ElDeeb ME
J Endod; 1996 Mar; 22(3):123-30. PubMed ID: 8618093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of instrument-centering ability within the root canal for three contemporary instrumentation techniques.
Song YL; Bian Z; Fan B; Fan MW; Gutmann JL; Peng B
Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):265-71. PubMed ID: 15056353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of maintenance of canal curvature using balanced-force instrumentation with three different file types.
Royal JR; Donnelly JC
J Endod; 1995 Jun; 21(6):300-4. PubMed ID: 7673837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of tip design of nickel-titanium and stainless steel files on root canal preparation.
Kuhn WG; Carnes DL; Clement DJ; Walker WA
J Endod; 1997 Dec; 23(12):735-8. PubMed ID: 9487848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of Flex-R files and K-type files for enlargement of severely curved molar root canals.
Sepic AO; Pantera EA; Neaverth EJ; Anderson RW
J Endod; 1989 Jun; 15(6):240-5. PubMed ID: 2592877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The quality of apical canal preparation using hand and rotary instruments with specific criteria for enlargement based on initial apical file size.
Tan BT; Messer HH
J Endod; 2002 Sep; 28(9):658-64. PubMed ID: 12236311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of mechanical and standard hand instrumentation techniques in curved root canals.
Campos JM; del Rio C
J Endod; 1990 May; 16(5):230-4. PubMed ID: 2074418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of canal centering ability of four instrumentation techniques.
Short JA; Morgan LA; Baumgartner JC
J Endod; 1997 Aug; 23(8):503-7. PubMed ID: 9587320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of curved canal instrumentation using nickel-titanium or stainless steel files with the balanced-force technique.
Harlan AL; Nicholls JI; Steiner JC
J Endod; 1996 Aug; 22(8):410-3. PubMed ID: 8941749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Histological evaluation of the effectiveness of five instrumentation techniques for cleaning the apical third of root canals.
Siqueira JF; Araújo MC; Garcia PF; Fraga RC; Dantas CJ
J Endod; 1997 Aug; 23(8):499-502. PubMed ID: 9587319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of noncutting tipped instruments on the quality of root canal preparation using a modified double-flared technique.
Saunders WP; Saunders EM
J Endod; 1992 Jan; 18(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 1402562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of four instrumentation techniques on curved canals: a comparison study.
Schäfer E
J Endod; 1996 Dec; 22(12):685-9. PubMed ID: 9220756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Apical third instrumentation of curved canals with K-type and canal master instruments.
Shankar P; Parameswaran A; Lakshminarayanan L
J Endod; 1993 May; 19(5):224-7. PubMed ID: 8360597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of curved canal transportation with balanced force versus lightspeed.
Shadid DB; Nicholls JI; Steiner JC
J Endod; 1998 Oct; 24(10):651-4. PubMed ID: 10023246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An in vitro comparison of the Excalibur handpiece and hand instrumentation in curved root canals.
Cheung GS; Chan AW
J Endod; 1996 Mar; 22(3):131-4. PubMed ID: 8618094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of three instruments in the preparation of the curved root canal using the modified double-flared technique.
Saunders WP; Saunders EM
J Endod; 1994 Sep; 20(9):440-4. PubMed ID: 7996114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Quantification of mechanical versus ultrasonic technique in root canal preparation].
Teodorović N; Ivanović V; Filipović V
Stomatol Glas Srb; 1990 Jun; 37(3):293-7. PubMed ID: 2131673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Canal preparation with Hero 642 rotary Ni-Ti instruments compared with stainless steel hand K-file assessed using computed tomography.
Taşdemir T; Aydemir H; Inan U; Unal O
Int Endod J; 2005 Jun; 38(6):402-8. PubMed ID: 15910476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Apical extrusion of debris using two hand and two rotary instrumentation techniques.
Reddy SA; Hicks ML
J Endod; 1998 Mar; 24(3):180-3. PubMed ID: 9558583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
