These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1919403)

  • 1. The effects of Canal Master, Flex-R, and K-Flex instrumentation on root canal configuration.
    Leseberg DA; Montgomery S
    J Endod; 1991 Feb; 17(2):59-65. PubMed ID: 1919403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An evaluation of the Canal Master, balanced force, and step-back techniques.
    Hankins PJ; ElDeeb ME
    J Endod; 1996 Mar; 22(3):123-30. PubMed ID: 8618093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of instrument-centering ability within the root canal for three contemporary instrumentation techniques.
    Song YL; Bian Z; Fan B; Fan MW; Gutmann JL; Peng B
    Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):265-71. PubMed ID: 15056353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of maintenance of canal curvature using balanced-force instrumentation with three different file types.
    Royal JR; Donnelly JC
    J Endod; 1995 Jun; 21(6):300-4. PubMed ID: 7673837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of tip design of nickel-titanium and stainless steel files on root canal preparation.
    Kuhn WG; Carnes DL; Clement DJ; Walker WA
    J Endod; 1997 Dec; 23(12):735-8. PubMed ID: 9487848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of Flex-R files and K-type files for enlargement of severely curved molar root canals.
    Sepic AO; Pantera EA; Neaverth EJ; Anderson RW
    J Endod; 1989 Jun; 15(6):240-5. PubMed ID: 2592877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The quality of apical canal preparation using hand and rotary instruments with specific criteria for enlargement based on initial apical file size.
    Tan BT; Messer HH
    J Endod; 2002 Sep; 28(9):658-64. PubMed ID: 12236311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of mechanical and standard hand instrumentation techniques in curved root canals.
    Campos JM; del Rio C
    J Endod; 1990 May; 16(5):230-4. PubMed ID: 2074418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of canal centering ability of four instrumentation techniques.
    Short JA; Morgan LA; Baumgartner JC
    J Endod; 1997 Aug; 23(8):503-7. PubMed ID: 9587320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of curved canal instrumentation using nickel-titanium or stainless steel files with the balanced-force technique.
    Harlan AL; Nicholls JI; Steiner JC
    J Endod; 1996 Aug; 22(8):410-3. PubMed ID: 8941749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Histological evaluation of the effectiveness of five instrumentation techniques for cleaning the apical third of root canals.
    Siqueira JF; Araújo MC; Garcia PF; Fraga RC; Dantas CJ
    J Endod; 1997 Aug; 23(8):499-502. PubMed ID: 9587319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of noncutting tipped instruments on the quality of root canal preparation using a modified double-flared technique.
    Saunders WP; Saunders EM
    J Endod; 1992 Jan; 18(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 1402562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of four instrumentation techniques on curved canals: a comparison study.
    Schäfer E
    J Endod; 1996 Dec; 22(12):685-9. PubMed ID: 9220756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Apical third instrumentation of curved canals with K-type and canal master instruments.
    Shankar P; Parameswaran A; Lakshminarayanan L
    J Endod; 1993 May; 19(5):224-7. PubMed ID: 8360597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of curved canal transportation with balanced force versus lightspeed.
    Shadid DB; Nicholls JI; Steiner JC
    J Endod; 1998 Oct; 24(10):651-4. PubMed ID: 10023246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An in vitro comparison of the Excalibur handpiece and hand instrumentation in curved root canals.
    Cheung GS; Chan AW
    J Endod; 1996 Mar; 22(3):131-4. PubMed ID: 8618094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of three instruments in the preparation of the curved root canal using the modified double-flared technique.
    Saunders WP; Saunders EM
    J Endod; 1994 Sep; 20(9):440-4. PubMed ID: 7996114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Quantification of mechanical versus ultrasonic technique in root canal preparation].
    Teodorović N; Ivanović V; Filipović V
    Stomatol Glas Srb; 1990 Jun; 37(3):293-7. PubMed ID: 2131673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Canal preparation with Hero 642 rotary Ni-Ti instruments compared with stainless steel hand K-file assessed using computed tomography.
    Taşdemir T; Aydemir H; Inan U; Unal O
    Int Endod J; 2005 Jun; 38(6):402-8. PubMed ID: 15910476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Apical extrusion of debris using two hand and two rotary instrumentation techniques.
    Reddy SA; Hicks ML
    J Endod; 1998 Mar; 24(3):180-3. PubMed ID: 9558583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.