These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1919403)

  • 21. Histologic evaluation of three endodontic instrument/preparation techniques.
    Zuolo ML; Walton RE; Imura N
    Endod Dent Traumatol; 1992 Jun; 8(3):125-9. PubMed ID: 1289071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of the Canal Master endodontic instrument and K-type files for enlargement of curved root canals.
    Gilles JA; del Rio CE
    J Endod; 1990 Dec; 16(12):561-5. PubMed ID: 2094757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. An in vivo evaluation of the efficacy of ultrasound after step-back preparation in mandibular molars.
    Archer R; Reader A; Nist R; Beck M; Meyers WJ
    J Endod; 1992 Nov; 18(11):549-52. PubMed ID: 1298792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
    Schäfer E; Vlassis M
    Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):239-48. PubMed ID: 15056350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Efficiency of hand and rotary instruments in shaping oval root canals.
    Weiger R; ElAyouti A; Löst C
    J Endod; 2002 Aug; 28(8):580-3. PubMed ID: 12184418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A novel noninstrumented technique for cleansing the root canal system.
    Lussi A; Nussbächer U; Grosrey J
    J Endod; 1993 Nov; 19(11):549-53. PubMed ID: 8151242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effect of coronal-radicular flaring on apical transportation.
    Swindle RB; Neaverth EJ; Pantera EA; Ringle RD
    J Endod; 1991 Apr; 17(4):147-9. PubMed ID: 1940732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effectiveness of apical clearing: histological and radiographical evaluation.
    Parris J; Wilcox L; Walton R
    J Endod; 1994 May; 20(5):219-24. PubMed ID: 7931011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Stereomicroscopic evaluation of canal shape following hand, sonic, and ultrasonic instrumentation.
    Loushine RJ; Weller RN; Hartwell GR
    J Endod; 1989 Sep; 15(9):417-21. PubMed ID: 2637335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of effects of ProTaper, HeroShaper, and Gates Glidden Burs on cervical dentin thickness and root canal volume by using multislice computed tomography.
    Mahran AH; AboEl-Fotouh MM
    J Endod; 2008 Oct; 34(10):1219-22. PubMed ID: 18793924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of balanced forces, endosonic, and step-back filing instrumentation techniques: quantification of extruded apical debris.
    McKendry DJ
    J Endod; 1990 Jan; 16(1):24-7. PubMed ID: 2388013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of different endodontic procedures on dentin morphology of human teeth.
    Prati C; Selighini M; Ferrieri P; Mongiorgi R
    J Endod; 1994 Apr; 20(4):174-9. PubMed ID: 8035157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Comparative study of hand-held nickel-titanium dental instruments based on the shape of the prepared root canal].
    Szabó J; Serbán T; Nagy G; Madléna M; Ipolyi T
    Fogorv Sz; 2003 Dec; 96(6):273-6. PubMed ID: 14971265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A comparison of molar root canal preparation using stainless-steel and nickel-titanium instruments.
    Carvalho LA; Bonetti I; Borges MA
    J Endod; 1999 Dec; 25(12):807-10. PubMed ID: 10726526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Analysis of Ni-Ti versus stainless steel instrumentation in resin simulated canals.
    Coleman CL; Svec TA
    J Endod; 1997 Apr; 23(4):232-5. PubMed ID: 9594772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A comparison of the canal centering ability of ProFile, K3, and RaCe Nickel Titanium rotary systems.
    Al-Sudani D; Al-Shahrani S
    J Endod; 2006 Dec; 32(12):1198-201. PubMed ID: 17174683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The effect of maintaining apical patency on canal transportation.
    Tsesis I; Amdor B; Tamse A; Kfir A
    Int Endod J; 2008 May; 41(5):431-5. PubMed ID: 18312378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Histological evaluation of ultrasonic and sonic instrumentation of curved root canals.
    Walker TL; del Rio CE
    J Endod; 1989 Feb; 15(2):49-59. PubMed ID: 2607269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Manual instrumentation of root canals. Review of the last decade].
    Roig Cayón M; Basilio Monne J; Canalda Sahli C
    Av Odontoestomatol; 1991 Jan; 7(1):49-57. PubMed ID: 2018612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effect of sonic versus ultrasonic instrumentation on canal preparation.
    Yahya AS; ElDeeb ME
    J Endod; 1989 Jun; 15(6):235-9. PubMed ID: 2592876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.