BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

702 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19194296)

  • 1. Sound localization, sound lateralization, and binaural masking level differences in young children with normal hearing.
    Van Deun L; van Wieringen A; Van den Bogaert T; Scherf F; Offeciers FE; Van de Heyning PH; Desloovere C; Dhooge IJ; Deggouj N; De Raeve L; Wouters J
    Ear Hear; 2009 Apr; 30(2):178-90. PubMed ID: 19194296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bilateral cochlear implants in children: binaural unmasking.
    Van Deun L; van Wieringen A; Francart T; Scherf F; Dhooge IJ; Deggouj N; Desloovere C; Van de Heyning PH; Offeciers FE; De Raeve L; Wouters J
    Audiol Neurootol; 2009; 14(4):240-7. PubMed ID: 19141992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Understanding speech in noise after correction of congenital unilateral aural atresia: effects of age in the emergence of binaural squelch but not in use of head-shadow.
    Gray L; Kesser B; Cole E
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Sep; 73(9):1281-7. PubMed ID: 19581007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effects of aging and interaural delay on the detection of a break in the interaural correlation between two sounds.
    Li L; Huang J; Wu X; Qi JG; Schneider BA
    Ear Hear; 2009 Apr; 30(2):273-86. PubMed ID: 19194287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Binaural masking level difference in skilled reading children and children with dyslexia.
    Putter-Katz H; Feldman I; Hildesheimer M
    J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol; 2011 Sep; 22(3):59-63. PubMed ID: 22865426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Auditory evoked potentials in the detection of interaural intensity differences in children and adults.
    Wambacq IJ; Koehnke J; Shea-Miller KJ; Besing J; Toth V; Abubakr A
    Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):320-31. PubMed ID: 17485981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Combination of masking releases for different center frequencies and masker amplitude statistics.
    Epp B; Verhey JL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Nov; 126(5):2479-89. PubMed ID: 19894828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Development and evaluation of the listening in spatialized noise test.
    Cameron S; Dillon H; Newall P
    Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 16446563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Establishment of age-specific normative data for the canadian French version of the hearing in noise test for children.
    Vaillancourt V; Laroche C; Giguère C; Soli SD
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):453-66. PubMed ID: 18349705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sound localization and binaural hearing in children with a hearing aid and a cochlear implant.
    Beijen J; Snik AF; Straatman LV; Mylanus EA; Mens LH
    Audiol Neurootol; 2010; 15(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 19451708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Lateralization of interimplant timing and level differences in children who use bilateral cochlear implants.
    Salloum CA; Valero J; Wong DD; Papsin BC; van Hoesel R; Gordon KA
    Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):441-56. PubMed ID: 20489647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Relative influence of interaural time and intensity differences on lateralization is modulated by attention to one or the other cue: 500-Hz sine tones.
    Lang AG; Buchner A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Nov; 126(5):2536-42. PubMed ID: 19894833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Development of the Listening in Spatialized Noise-Sentences Test (LISN-S).
    Cameron S; Dillon H
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):196-211. PubMed ID: 17496671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Binaural advantage for younger and older adults with normal hearing.
    Dubno JR; Ahlstrom JB; Horwitz AR
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Apr; 51(2):539-56. PubMed ID: 18367695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Examination of binaural signal processing in normally hearing subjects using electrophysiological and psychoacoustical measurements].
    Walger M; Stötzer S; Meister H; Foerst A; von Wedel H
    HNO; 2003 Feb; 51(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 12589418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. High-frequency pure-tone audiometry in children: a test-retest reliability study relative to ototoxic criteria.
    Beahan N; Kei J; Driscoll C; Charles B; Khan A
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(1):104-11. PubMed ID: 21760512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Brain stem and cortical mechanisms underlying the binaural masking level difference in humans: an auditory steady-state response study.
    Wong WY; Stapells DR
    Ear Hear; 2004 Feb; 25(1):57-67. PubMed ID: 14770018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The benefits of sequential bilateral cochlear implantation for hearing-impaired children.
    Steffens T; Lesinski-Schiedat A; Strutz J; Aschendorff A; Klenzner T; Rühl S; Voss B; Wesarg T; Laszig R; Lenarz T
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2008 Feb; 128(2):164-76. PubMed ID: 17851947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Coding of temporally fluctuating interaural timing disparities in a binaural processing model based on phase differences.
    Dietz M; Ewert SD; Hohmann V; Kollmeier B
    Brain Res; 2008 Jul; 1220():234-45. PubMed ID: 17949695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A novel type of auditory responses: temporal dynamics of 40-Hz steady-state responses induced by changes in sound localization.
    Ross B
    J Neurophysiol; 2008 Sep; 100(3):1265-77. PubMed ID: 18632891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 36.