These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19194675)

  • 1. Facial profile and lip position changes in adult Class II, Division 2 subjects treated with the Herbst-Multibracket appliance. A radiographic cephalometric pilot study.
    Bock NC; Santo C; Pancherz H
    J Orofac Orthop; 2009 Jan; 70(1):51-62. PubMed ID: 19194675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Facial profile changes during and after Herbst appliance treatment.
    Pancherz H; Anehus-Pancherz M
    Eur J Orthod; 1994 Aug; 16(4):275-86. PubMed ID: 7957652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The incisor-lip relationship in Herbst/multibracket appliance treatment of Class II, Division 2 malocclusions.
    Schweitzer M; Pancherz H
    Angle Orthod; 2001 Oct; 71(5):358-63. PubMed ID: 11605869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Herbst/multibracket appliance treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusions in early and late adulthood. a prospective cephalometric study of consecutively treated subjects.
    Ruf S; Pancherz H
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Aug; 28(4):352-60. PubMed ID: 16644850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Changes in soft tissue profile following the treatment using a Herbst appliance--a photographic analysis.
    Nedeljković N; Cubrilo D; Hadzi-Mihailović M
    Vojnosanit Pregl; 2014 Jan; 71(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 24516984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reaction of facial soft tissues to treatment with a Herbst appliance.
    Meyer-Marcotty P; Kochel J; Richter U; Richter F; Stellzig-Eisenhauer A
    J Orofac Orthop; 2012 Apr; 73(2):116-25. PubMed ID: 22391787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relationship between malocclusion, soft tissue profile, and pharyngeal airways: A cephalometric study.
    Lopatienė K; Šidlauskas A; Vasiliauskas A; Čečytė L; Švalkauskienė V; Šidlauskas M
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2016; 52(5):307-314. PubMed ID: 27816426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Improving lip aesthetics in the face profile after treatment of class II, division 2 malocclusion.
    Koniarova Z; Husarova R; Stefkova M; Spidlen M; Statelova D; Janickova M; Koniarova A
    Bratisl Lek Listy; 2022; 123(3):185-190. PubMed ID: 35343750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Soft tissue profile changes after Functional Mandibular Advancer or Herbst appliance treatment in class II patients.
    Hourfar J; Lisson JA; Gross U; Frye L; Kinzinger GSM
    Clin Oral Investig; 2018 Mar; 22(2):971-980. PubMed ID: 28721528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Soft tissue changes produced by a banded-type Herbst appliance in late mixed dentition patients.
    de Almeida MR; Flores-Mir C; Brandão AG; de Almeida RR; de Almeida-Pedrin RR
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(2):121-31. PubMed ID: 18575306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mandibular incisor position changes in relation to amount of bite jumping during Herbst/multibracket appliance treatment: a radiographic-cephalometric study.
    Martin J; Pancherz H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 19577147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [
    Zhou ZJ; Chen Y; Lin YJ; Sun YT; Wang TG; Mao LX; Liu JQ
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2021 Jan; 56(1):63-69. PubMed ID: 34645237
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Changes in soft tissue profile using functional appliances in the treatment of skeletal class II malocclusion.
    Stamenković Z; Raičković V; Ristić V
    Srp Arh Celok Lek; 2015; 143(1-2):12-5. PubMed ID: 25845246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Lip profile changes in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion of varied growth patterns treated with maxillary premolar extractions: A pilot study.
    Mishra D; Natarajan M; Urala AS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2020 Nov; 158(5):684-693. PubMed ID: 33010980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Orthodonticorthognathic treatment stability in skeletal class III malocclusion patients].
    Wang XJ; Zhang YM; Zhou YH
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2019 Feb; 51(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 30773550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dentoskeletal changes in adult Class II division 1 Herbst treatment--how much is left after the retention period?
    Bock NC; Ruf S
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Dec; 34(6):747-53. PubMed ID: 21785003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of the stability of treatment with Herbst appliance associated with Hyrax expander and fixed orthodontics through counterpart analysis: A longitudinal follow-up study.
    de Arruda Aidar LA; Marchi LC; Fuerte S; Yamashita HK; Dominguez GC
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2023 Feb; 26(1):27-36. PubMed ID: 35347846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Facial soft-tissue shape changes after fixed edgewise treatment with premolar extraction in individual artificial-intelligence-classified facial profile patterns.
    Tanikawa C; Tan TJ; Takada K
    BMC Oral Health; 2024 Jun; 24(1):740. PubMed ID: 38937790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Soft-tissue profile changes resulting from retraction of maxillary incisors.
    Talass MF; Talass L; Baker RC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1987 May; 91(5):385-94. PubMed ID: 3472457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Incisal and soft tissue effects of maxillary premolar extraction in class II treatment.
    Tadic N; Woods MG
    Angle Orthod; 2007 Sep; 77(5):808-16. PubMed ID: 17685775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.