These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19194675)

  • 21. Perioral soft tissue evaluation of skeletal Class II Division 1: A lateral cephalometric study.
    Lee YJ; Park JT; Cha JY
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Sep; 148(3):405-13. PubMed ID: 26321338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Cephalometric study of Class II Division 1 patients treated with an extended-duration, reinforced, banded Herbst appliance followed by fixed appliances.
    Tomblyn T; Rogers M; Andrews L; Martin C; Tremont T; Gunel E; Ngan P
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Nov; 150(5):818-830. PubMed ID: 27871709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Soft tissue and dentoskeletal profile changes associated with maxillary expansion and protraction headgear treatment.
    Ngan P; Hägg U; Yiu C; Merwin D; Wei SH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1996 Jan; 109(1):38-49. PubMed ID: 8540481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The Influence of Class II Division 2 Malocclusions on the Harmony of the Human Face Profile.
    Perović T
    Med Sci Monit; 2017 Nov; 23():5589-5598. PubMed ID: 29170363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of facial soft tissue changes after treatment with 3 different functional appliances.
    Güler ÖÇ; Malkoç S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2020 Oct; 158(4):518-526. PubMed ID: 32988567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Class II division 2 treatment--does skeletal maturity influence success and stability?
    Bock NC; Ruf S
    J Orofac Orthop; 2013 May; 74(3):187-204. PubMed ID: 23652739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Factors affecting changes in soft tissue profile after various treatment modalities for skeletal Class II malocclusion: A cross-sectional study.
    Khan AR; Fida M; Sukhia RH
    Int Orthod; 2019 Sep; 17(3):497-505. PubMed ID: 31257136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Three-dimensional condylar changes from Herbst appliance and multibracket treatment: A comparison with matched Class II elastics.
    Wei RY; Atresh A; Ruellas A; Cevidanes LHS; Nguyen T; Larson BE; Mangum JE; Manton DJ; Schneider PM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2020 Oct; 158(4):505-517.e6. PubMed ID: 32828608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Analysis of soft tissue thickness in persons with malocclusions of Class II division 1 and Class II division 2].
    Tanić T; Blažej Z; Mitić V
    Srp Arh Celok Lek; 2012; 140(7-8):412-8. PubMed ID: 23092023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A comparison of the skeletal, dental, and soft tissue effects caused by herbst and mandibular protraction appliances in the treatment of mandibular Class II malocclusions.
    Alves PF; Oliveira AG
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(1):e1-19. PubMed ID: 19641760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Changes in soft-tissue profiles after treatment of class II/1 patients with bite-jumping appliances.
    Lisson JA; Mokrys K; Kinzinger GS; Glasl B; Ludwig B
    J Orofac Orthop; 2013 Mar; 74(2):113-23. PubMed ID: 23463301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Factors influencing soft tissue profile changes following orthodontic treatment in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion.
    Maetevorakul S; Viteporn S
    Prog Orthod; 2016; 17():13. PubMed ID: 27135067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Cephalometric evaluation of the effects of the Twin Block appliance in subjects with Class II, Division 1 malocclusion amongst different cervical vertebral maturation stages.
    Khoja A; Fida M; Shaikh A
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2016 Jun; 21(3):73-84. PubMed ID: 27409656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The relationship between hard and soft tissue changes following treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusions using Edgewise and Fränkel appliance techniques.
    Battagel JM
    Eur J Orthod; 1990 May; 12(2):154-65. PubMed ID: 2351200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Long-term effects of Class II Herbst treatment on the pharyngeal airway width.
    Drosen C; Bock NC; von Bremen J; Pancherz H; Ruf S
    Eur J Orthod; 2018 Jan; 40(1):82-89. PubMed ID: 28453618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Soft tissue changes: a comparison between changes caused by the construction bite and by successful treatment with a modified Twin-block appliance.
    Salloum E; Millett DT; Kelly N; McIntyre GT; Cronin MS
    Eur J Orthod; 2018 Sep; 40(5):512-518. PubMed ID: 29300850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Soft tissue profile changes in Angle class II patients treated with Twin Force or intermaxillary elastics-a comparison.
    Falcão ICMCF; Valarelli FP; Canuto LFG; Oliveira RC; de Oliveira RCG; Cançado RH; Freitas KMS
    J Orofac Orthop; 2021 Mar; 82(2):71-81. PubMed ID: 33210180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Herbst appliance anchored to miniscrews in the upper and lower arches vs standard Herbst: A pilot study.
    Manni A; Migliorati M; Calzolari C; Silvestrini-Biavati A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Nov; 156(5):617-625. PubMed ID: 31677670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Dentoskeletal effects during Herbst-Multibracket appliance treatment: a comparison of lingual and labial approaches.
    Bock NC; Ruf S; Wiechmann D; Jilek T
    Eur J Orthod; 2016 Oct; 38(5):470-7. PubMed ID: 26378084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Establishment of South Indian soft tissue cephalometric norms using profile angles and esthetic analysis.
    Biradar AK; Madanagowda SB
    World J Orthod; 2010; 11(4):e104-13. PubMed ID: 21490979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.