These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

598 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19194898)

  • 41. Application of a pore-blockage--cake-filtration model to protein fouling during microfiltration.
    Palacio L; Ho CC; Zydney AL
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2002 Aug; 79(3):260-70. PubMed ID: 12115414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Recycling of spent filter backwash water using coagulation-assisted membrane filtration: effects of submicrometre particles on membrane flux.
    Huang C; Lin JL; Wu CL; Chu CP
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(8):1923-9. PubMed ID: 20388988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Effects of chemical additives on filtration and rheological characteristics of MBR sludge.
    Koseoglu H; Yigit NO; Civelekoglu G; Harman BI; Kitis M
    Bioresour Technol; 2012 Aug; 117():48-54. PubMed ID: 22609713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The influence of aeration intensity on predation and EPS production in membrane bioreactors.
    Menniti A; Morgenroth E
    Water Res; 2010 Apr; 44(8):2541-53. PubMed ID: 20202663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Characteristics of membrane fouling in submerged membrane bioreactor under sub-critical flux operation.
    Su YC; Huang CP; Pan JR; Lee HC
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 57(4):601-5. PubMed ID: 18360002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Characterising humic acid fouling of nanofiltration membranes using bisphenol A as a molecular indicator.
    Nghiem LD; Vogel D; Khan S
    Water Res; 2008 Sep; 42(15):4049-58. PubMed ID: 18678386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Natural organic matter fouling of low-pressure, hollow-fiber membranes: Effects of NOM source and hydrodynamic conditions.
    Huang H; Lee N; Young T; Gary A; Lozier JC; Jacangelo JG
    Water Res; 2007 Sep; 41(17):3823-32. PubMed ID: 17644151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Effect of NOM characteristics and membrane type on microfiltration performance.
    Gray SR; Ritchie CB; Tran T; Bolto BA
    Water Res; 2007 Sep; 41(17):3833-41. PubMed ID: 17618672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. An integrated process for mammalian cell perfusion cultivation and product purification using a dynamic filter.
    Castilho LR; Anspach FB; Deckwer WD
    Biotechnol Prog; 2002; 18(4):776-81. PubMed ID: 12153312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Comparison of MFI-UF constant pressure, MFI-UF constant flux and Crossflow Sampler-Modified Fouling Index Ultrafiltration (CFS-MFI UF).
    Sim LN; Ye Y; Chen V; Fane AG
    Water Res; 2011 Feb; 45(4):1639-50. PubMed ID: 21194721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Modeling of the Permeate Flux during Microfiltration of BSA-Adsorbed Microspheres in a Stirred Cell.
    Choi SW; Yoon JY; Haam S; Jung JK; Kim JH; Kim WS
    J Colloid Interface Sci; 2000 Aug; 228(2):270-278. PubMed ID: 10926466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Dean vortex membrane microfiltration and diafiltration of rBDNF E. coli inclusion bodies.
    Schutyser M; Rupp R; Wideman J; Belfort G
    Biotechnol Prog; 2002; 18(2):322-9. PubMed ID: 11934303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Comparison of fouling characteristics of two different poly-vinylidene fluoride microfiltration membranes in a pilot-scale drinking water treatment system using pre-coagulation/sedimentation, sand filtration, and chlorination.
    Chae SR; Yamamura H; Ikeda K; Watanabe Y
    Water Res; 2008 Apr; 42(8-9):2029-42. PubMed ID: 18242659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Optimization of protein fractionation by skim milk microfiltration: Choice of ceramic membrane pore size and filtration temperature.
    Jørgensen CE; Abrahamsen RK; Rukke EO; Johansen AG; Schüller RB; Skeie SB
    J Dairy Sci; 2016 Aug; 99(8):6164-6179. PubMed ID: 27265169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Crossflow filtration for CHO cell separation by microfiltration using crossflow systems.
    Eberlein R; Meyeroltmanns F; Pahl I; Prashad M
    Meded Rijksuniv Gent Fak Landbouwkd Toegep Biol Wet; 2001; 66(3a):243-8. PubMed ID: 15954595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Micron-pore-sized metallic filter tube membranes for filtration of particulates and water purification.
    Phelps TJ; Palumbo AV; Bischoff BL; Miller CJ; Fagan LA; McNeilly MS; Judkins RR
    J Microbiol Methods; 2008 Jul; 74(1):10-6. PubMed ID: 17884208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Separation of specific immunoglobulin. 1. Desalination using a membrane system.
    Tishchenko G; Bleha M; Skvor J; Bures L
    Bioseparation; 1995 Feb; 5(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 7766150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Engineering of an MBR supernatant fouling layer by fine particles addition: a possible way to control cake compressibility.
    Teychene B; Guigui C; Cabassud C
    Water Res; 2011 Feb; 45(5):2060-72. PubMed ID: 21232780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Effect of membrane length, membrane resistance, and filtration conditions on the fractionation of milk proteins by microfiltration.
    Piry A; Heino A; Kühnl W; Grein T; Ripperger S; Kulozik U
    J Dairy Sci; 2012 Apr; 95(4):1590-602. PubMed ID: 22459807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Transient and stationary operating conditions on performance of lactic acid bacteria crossflow microfiltration.
    Boyaval P; Lavenant C; Gésan G; Daufin G
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 1996 Jan; 49(1):78-86. PubMed ID: 18623556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 30.