482 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19195105)
1. Big bang theory: more reason to scrap Bush's stem cell policy.
Cohen CB
Hastings Cent Rep; 2008; 38(6):4-5. PubMed ID: 19195105
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Big bang theory: more reason to scrap Bush's stem cell policy.
Hyun I
Hastings Cent Rep; 2008; 38(6):5-6; author reply 6. PubMed ID: 19192704
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Big bang theory: more reason to scrap Bush's stem cell policy.
Robertson JA
Hastings Cent Rep; 2008; 38(6):4. PubMed ID: 19192703
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Research ethics. The NIH draft guidelines on human stem cell research.
Majumder MA; Cohen CB
Science; 2009 Jun; 324(5935):1648-9. PubMed ID: 19556488
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Taking another look at the definition of an embryo: President Bush's criteria and the problematic application of federal regulations to human embryonic stem cells.
Auerbach SB
Emory Law J; 2002; 51(4):1557-604. PubMed ID: 15212030
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomedical research. A first step in relaxing restrictions on stem cell research.
Holden C
Science; 2009 Mar; 323(5920):1412-3. PubMed ID: 19286523
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Stem cells. Ethics questions add to concerns about NIH lines.
Vogel G; Holden C
Science; 2008 Aug; 321(5890):756-7. PubMed ID: 18687929
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Federal funding and the regulation of embryonic stem cell research: the Pontius Pilate maneuver.
Levine RJ
Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2009; 9 Suppl():552-64. PubMed ID: 19757720
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Embryonic stem cells. Rumors and trial balloons precede Bush's funding decision.
Vogel G
Science; 2001 Jul; 293(5528):186-7. PubMed ID: 11452086
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. House challenges Bush's limits on embryonic-stem-cell research.
Brainard J
Chron High Educ; 2005 Jun; 51(39):A17. PubMed ID: 16018100
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Stem cells. HHS inks cell deal; NAS calls for more lines.
Holden C
Science; 2001 Sep; 293(5537):1966-7. PubMed ID: 11557847
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Informed consent and federal funding for stem cell research.
Streiffer R
Hastings Cent Rep; 2008; 38(3):40-7. PubMed ID: 18581936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomedical policy. Draft stem cell guidelines please many, disappoint some.
Holden C; Kaiser J
Science; 2009 Apr; 324(5926):446. PubMed ID: 19390007
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Audio interview: expanding federal funding for embryonic stem-cell research. Interview by Rachel Gotbaum.
Hatch OG
N Engl J Med; 2007 May; 356(18):e18. PubMed ID: 17452439
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Teetering on the brink.
Nat Biotechnol; 2010 Oct; 28(10):987. PubMed ID: 20944563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Without more federal support, success of U.S. stem cell research questioned.
Schmidt C
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 Feb; 97(3):164-5. PubMed ID: 15687355
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Stem cell funding widens.
Netterwald J
Nat Biotechnol; 2009 Aug; 27(8):681. PubMed ID: 19668157
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Institutional review boards have new role in stem cell research.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2000 Oct; 15(10):1-2. PubMed ID: 11913434
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Stem cell research and conditional federal funding: do state laws allowing more extensive research pose a problem for federalism?
Schiller C
Pepperdine Law Rev; 2004 May; 31(4):1017-54. PubMed ID: 16514766
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Federal funding of human embryonic stem cell research: an institutional examination.
Fujikawa R
South Calif Law Rev; 2005 May; 78(4):1075-124. PubMed ID: 17340756
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
