399 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19195503)
1. Comparison of diagnostic and prognostic value of different electrocardiographic criteria to delayed-enhancement magnetic resonance imaging for healed myocardial infarction.
Krittayaphong R; Maneesai A; Chaithiraphan V; Saiviroonporn P; Chaiphet O; Udompunturak S
Am J Cardiol; 2009 Feb; 103(4):464-70. PubMed ID: 19195503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Lack of sensitivity of the electrocardiogram for detection of old myocardial infarction: a cardiac magnetic resonance imaging study.
Asch FM; Shah S; Rattin C; Swaminathan S; Fuisz A; Lindsay J
Am Heart J; 2006 Oct; 152(4):742-8. PubMed ID: 16996851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of unrecognized myocardial scar detected by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging on event-free survival in patients presenting with signs or symptoms of coronary artery disease.
Kwong RY; Chan AK; Brown KA; Chan CW; Reynolds HG; Tsang S; Davis RB
Circulation; 2006 Jun; 113(23):2733-43. PubMed ID: 16754804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Improved detection of coronary artery disease by stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance with the use of delayed enhancement infarction imaging.
Klem I; Heitner JF; Shah DJ; Sketch MH; Behar V; Weinsaft J; Cawley P; Parker M; Elliott M; Judd RM; Kim RJ
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2006 Apr; 47(8):1630-8. PubMed ID: 16631001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Contrast-enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging of right ventricular infarction.
Kumar A; Abdel-Aty H; Kriedemann I; Schulz-Menger J; Gross CM; Dietz R; Friedrich MG
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2006 Nov; 48(10):1969-76. PubMed ID: 17112986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Detection of healed myocardial infarction with multidetector-row computed tomography and comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance delayed hyperenhancement.
Sanz J; Weeks D; Nikolaou K; Sirol M; Rius T; Rajagopalan S; Dellegrottaglie S; Strobeck J; Fuster V; Poon M
Am J Cardiol; 2006 Jul; 98(2):149-55. PubMed ID: 16828583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Characterization of the peri-infarct zone by contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging is a powerful predictor of post-myocardial infarction mortality.
Yan AT; Shayne AJ; Brown KA; Gupta SN; Chan CW; Luu TM; Di Carli MF; Reynolds HG; Stevenson WG; Kwong RY
Circulation; 2006 Jul; 114(1):32-9. PubMed ID: 16801462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. ST-segment deviation analysis of the admission 12-lead electrocardiogram as an aid to early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction with a cardiac magnetic resonance imaging gold standard.
Martin TN; Groenning BA; Murray HM; Steedman T; Foster JE; Elliot AT; Dargie HJ; Selvester RH; Pahlm O; Wagner GS
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2007 Sep; 50(11):1021-8. PubMed ID: 17825710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cardiac magnetic resonance with T2-weighted imaging improves detection of patients with acute coronary syndrome in the emergency department.
Cury RC; Shash K; Nagurney JT; Rosito G; Shapiro MD; Nomura CH; Abbara S; Bamberg F; Ferencik M; Schmidt EJ; Brown DF; Hoffmann U; Brady TJ
Circulation; 2008 Aug; 118(8):837-44. PubMed ID: 18678772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prognosis of negative adenosine stress magnetic resonance in patients presenting to an emergency department with chest pain.
Ingkanisorn WP; Kwong RY; Bohme NS; Geller NL; Rhoads KL; Dyke CK; Paterson DI; Syed MA; Aletras AH; Arai AE
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2006 Apr; 47(7):1427-32. PubMed ID: 16580532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of left ventricular scar size, location, and transmurality on left ventricular remodeling with healed myocardial infarction.
Orn S; Manhenke C; Anand IS; Squire I; Nagel E; Edvardsen T; Dickstein K
Am J Cardiol; 2007 Apr; 99(8):1109-14. PubMed ID: 17437737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Concordance of electrocardiographic patterns and healed myocardial infarction location detected by cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
Bayés de Luna A; Cino JM; Pujadas S; Cygankiewicz I; Carreras F; Garcia-Moll X; Noguero M; Fiol M; Elosua R; Cinca J; Pons-Lladó G
Am J Cardiol; 2006 Feb; 97(4):443-51. PubMed ID: 16461034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Value of the 12-lead resting electrocardiogram for the diagnosis of previous myocardial infarction in paced patients.
Théraulaz D; Zimmermann M; Meiltz A; Bloch A
J Electrocardiol; 2007; 40(6):496-503. PubMed ID: 17532336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prognostic significance of delayed-enhancement magnetic resonance imaging: survival of 857 patients with and without left ventricular dysfunction.
Cheong BY; Muthupillai R; Wilson JM; Sung A; Huber S; Amin S; Elayda MA; Lee VV; Flamm SD
Circulation; 2009 Nov; 120(21):2069-76. PubMed ID: 19901193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic and prognostic value of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in assessing myocardial viability.
Kwong RY; Korlakunta H
Top Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Feb; 19(1):15-24. PubMed ID: 18690157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Delayed enhancement and T2-weighted cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging differentiate acute from chronic myocardial infarction.
Abdel-Aty H; Zagrosek A; Schulz-Menger J; Taylor AJ; Messroghli D; Kumar A; Gross M; Dietz R; Friedrich MG
Circulation; 2004 May; 109(20):2411-6. PubMed ID: 15123531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Specificity of electrocardiographic myocardial infarction screening criteria in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathies.
Shah BR; Lin C; Maynard C; Bart B; Selvester RH; Shaw LK; O'Connor C; Wagner GS
Am Heart J; 1998 Aug; 136(2):314-9. PubMed ID: 9704696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prognostic significance and magnetic resonance imaging findings in aborted myocardial infarction after primary angioplasty.
Eitel I; Desch S; Sareban M; Fuernau G; Gutberlet M; Schuler G; Thiele H
Am Heart J; 2009 Nov; 158(5):806-13. PubMed ID: 19853702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Importance of standardized assessment of late gadolinium enhancement for quantification of infarct size by cardiac magnetic resonance: implications for comparison with electrocardiogram.
Welinder A; Hakacova N; Martin T; Engblom H
J Electrocardiol; 2011; 44(5):538-43. PubMed ID: 21872000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. How reliable is electrocardiography in differentiating transmural from non-transmural myocardial infarction? A study with contrast magnetic resonance imaging as gold standard.
Sievers B; John B; Brandts B; Franken U; van Bracht M; Trappe HJ
Int J Cardiol; 2004 Dec; 97(3):417-23. PubMed ID: 15561328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
