These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19195973)
1. The effectiveness of inking needle core prostate biopsies for preventing patient specimen identification errors: a technique to address Joint Commission patient safety goals in specialty laboratories. Raff LJ; Engel G; Beck KR; O'Brien AS; Bauer ME Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2009 Feb; 133(2):295-7. PubMed ID: 19195973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The value of inking breast cores to reduce specimen mix-up. Renshaw AA; Kish R; Gould EW Am J Clin Pathol; 2007 Feb; 127(2):271-2. PubMed ID: 17210528 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Use of tissue ink to maintain identification of individual cores on needle biopsies of the prostate. Singh PB; Saw NK; Haq A; Blades RA; Martin FL; Matanhelia SS; Nicholson CM J Clin Pathol; 2008 Sep; 61(9):1055-7. PubMed ID: 18641411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Application of tissue-marking ink to prostate biopsy specimens. Terris MK; McNeal JE Prostate; 2002 Mar; 50(4):247-51. PubMed ID: 11870803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Inking in Surgical Pathology: Does the Method Matter? A Procedural Analysis of a Spectrum of Colours. Pursnani D; Arora S; Katyayani P; C A; Yelikar BR Turk Patoloji Derg; 2016; 32(2):112-8. PubMed ID: 27136110 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Specimen misidentification in pathology laboratory: trends and measures]. Minato H; Fukushima M; Nojima T; Nakano M Rinsho Byori; 2013 Aug; 61(8):751-9. PubMed ID: 24218776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Misidentification in laboratory medicine and diagnostic process: a neglected problem calling for action. Toccafondi G; Tartaglia R; Balboni F; Tomei A; Pasquini V; Pezzati P Clin Chem Lab Med; 2016 Jul; 54(7):e181-2. PubMed ID: 26562039 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Utilization trends and positive biopsy rates for prostate biopsies in the United States: 2005 to 2011. Kapoor DA; Bostwick DG; Mendrinos SE; Anderson AE; Olsson CA Rev Urol; 2013; 15(4):137-44. PubMed ID: 24659910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Patient safety in the clinical laboratory: a longitudinal analysis of specimen identification errors. Wagar EA; Tamashiro L; Yasin B; Hilborne L; Bruckner DA Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2006 Nov; 130(11):1662-8. PubMed ID: 17076528 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Inking of gross specimens: a systematic review. Kizhakkoottu S; Jayaraj G; Sherlin HJ; Don KR; Santhanam A Arkh Patol; 2021; 83(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 33512128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Simulation of microcalcifications on specimen radiographs of breast biopsies by inks used in marking the surgical resection margins. Wong JW; Bai H; Abdul-Karim FW; MacLennan GT Breast J; 2004; 10(5):423-6. PubMed ID: 15327496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Novel Use of Preoperative Epidermal Coloring of Very Small Dermatological Specimens-Protocol for Reduction of Lost Specimens. Surprenant D; Garib G; Hutchens K; Dreifke M; Speiser J; Winterfield L; Peterson A; Krol C; Adams W; Tung R Am J Dermatopathol; 2016 Jul; 38(7):510-2. PubMed ID: 26675356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]