These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19195973)

  • 21. The Joint Commission's National Patient Safety Goals: implications for home care and hospice organizations.
    Friedman MM
    Home Healthc Nurse; 2003 Jul; 21(7):481-8; quiz 489-90. PubMed ID: 12858097
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Errors in laboratory medicine: practical lessons to improve patient safety.
    Howanitz PJ
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2005 Oct; 129(10):1252-61. PubMed ID: 16196513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Patient participation in surgical site marking: can this be an additional tool to help avoid wrong-site surgery?
    Bergal LM; Schwarzkopf R; Walsh M; Tejwani NC
    J Patient Saf; 2010 Dec; 6(4):221-5. PubMed ID: 21500609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Diagnostic uncertainty expressed in prostate needle biopsies. A College of American Pathologists Q-probes Study of 15,753 prostate needle biopsies in 332 institutions.
    Novis DA; Zarbo RJ; Valenstein PA
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1999 Aug; 123(8):687-92. PubMed ID: 10420224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Prediction of tumour volume and pathological stage in radical prostatectomy specimens is not improved by taking more prostate needle-biopsy cores.
    Grossklaus DJ; Coffey CS; Shappell SB; Jack GS; Cookson MS
    BJU Int; 2001 Nov; 88(7):722-6. PubMed ID: 11890243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Variable fidelity of tissue-marking dyes in surgical pathology.
    Williams AS; Dakin Haché K
    Histopathology; 2014 May; 64(6):896-900. PubMed ID: 24245850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Surgical specimen identification errors: a new measure of quality in surgical care.
    Makary MA; Epstein J; Pronovost PJ; Millman EA; Hartmann EC; Freischlag JA
    Surgery; 2007 Apr; 141(4):450-5. PubMed ID: 17383521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Molecular confirmation of pathological specimen integrity in Australasia.
    Bell CG; Wood DR; Cheong SJ; Kwan E; Sinosich M; Delprado W; Baumgart KW
    Pathology; 2009; 41(3):280-3. PubMed ID: 19291541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Questionnaire based evaluation of prostate biopsy complication comparing different bioptic schemes].
    Damiano R; Oliva A; Cantiello F; Esposito C; Perdonà S; De Sio M; Bitonti M; Sacco R; D'Armiento M
    Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2003 Mar; 75(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 12741345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Fragments of prostatic biopsy: characteristics, dimensions, and number].
    Muzzonigro G; Galosi AB; Milanese G; Dellabella M; Montironi R
    Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2000 Dec; 72(4):145-9. PubMed ID: 11221027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Correlation of DNA ploidy and histologic diagnosis from prostate core-needle biopsies: is DNA ploidy more sensitive than histology for the diagnosis of carcinoma in small specimens?
    Lo J; Kerns BJ; Amling CL; Robertson CN; Layfield LJ
    J Surg Oncol; 1996 Sep; 63(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 8841465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Increasing the number of biopsies increases the concordance of Gleason scores of needle biopsies and prostatectomy specimens.
    Divrik RT; Eroglu A; Sahin A; Zorlu F; Ozen H
    Urol Oncol; 2007; 25(5):376-82. PubMed ID: 17826653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. "Time out" for patient safety no joke to JCAHO.
    Patient Care Manag; 2003 Oct; 19(10):1-2. PubMed ID: 14593845
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Dataset for the reporting of prostate carcinoma in core needle biopsy and transurethral resection and enucleation specimens: recommendations from the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR).
    Egevad L; Judge M; Delahunt B; Humphrey PA; Kristiansen G; Oxley J; Rasiah K; Takahashi H; Trpkov K; Varma M; Wheeler TM; Zhou M; Srigley JR; Kench JG
    Pathology; 2019 Jan; 51(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 30477882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Prostate biopsy grading errors: a sampling problem?
    King CR; Long JP
    Int J Cancer; 2000 Dec; 90(6):326-30. PubMed ID: 11180135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. In search of the rainbow: colored inks in surgical pathology.
    Tampi C
    Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2012; 55(2):154-7. PubMed ID: 22771634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Identification errors in the blood transfusion laboratory: a still relevant issue for patient safety.
    Lippi G; Plebani M
    Transfus Apher Sci; 2011 Apr; 44(2):231-3. PubMed ID: 21324749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Clinical and pathologic tumor characteristics of prostate cancer as a function of the number of biopsy cores: a retrospective study.
    Naughton CK; Smith DS; Humphrey PA; Catalona WJ; Keetch DW
    Urology; 1998 Nov; 52(5):808-13. PubMed ID: 9801104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A quality initiative to decrease pathology specimen-labeling errors using radiofrequency identification in a high-volume endoscopy center.
    Francis DL; Prabhakar S; Sanderson SO
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2009 Apr; 104(4):972-5. PubMed ID: 19259073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A comparison of microscopic ink characteristics of 35 commercially available surgical margin inks.
    Milovancev M; Löhr CV; Bildfell RJ; Gelberg HB; Heidel JR; Valentine BA
    Vet Surg; 2013 Nov; 42(8):901-8. PubMed ID: 24117947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.