237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19196265)
1. Influence of circumferential resection margin on prognosis in distal esophageal and gastroesophageal cancer approached through the transhiatal route.
Scheepers JJ; van der Peet DL; Veenhof AA; Cuesta MA
Dis Esophagus; 2009; 22(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 19196265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Defining a positive circumferential resection margin in oesophageal cancer and its implications for adjuvant treatment.
O'Neill JR; Stephens NA; Save V; Kamel HM; Phillips HA; Driscoll PJ; Paterson-Brown S
Br J Surg; 2013 Jul; 100(8):1055-63. PubMed ID: 23616367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The prognostic value of circumferential resection margin in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after concurrent chemoradiation therapy and surgery.
Liu CY; Wang BY; Lee MY; Tsai YC; Liu CC; Shih CH
J Chin Med Assoc; 2013 Oct; 76(10):570-5. PubMed ID: 23938149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The prognostic value of circumferential resection margin involvement in oesophageal malignancy.
Griffiths EA; Brummell Z; Gorthi G; Pritchard SA; Welch IM
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2006 May; 32(4):413-9. PubMed ID: 16504455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prognostic Significant or Not? The Positive Circumferential Resection Margin in Esophageal Cancer: Impact on Local Recurrence and Overall Survival in Patients Without Neoadjuvant Treatment.
Ghadban T; Reeh M; Koenig AM; Nentwich MF; Bellon E; Izbicki JR; Vashist YK; Kutup A
Ann Surg; 2017 Dec; 266(6):988-994. PubMed ID: 27617855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Laparoscopic versus open transhiatal esophagectomy for distal and junction cancer.
Maas KW; Biere SS; Scheepers JJ; Gisbertz SS; van-der-Peet DL; Cuesta MA
Rev Esp Enferm Dig; 2012 Apr; 104(4):197-202. PubMed ID: 22537368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of circumferential resection margin clearance criteria with survival after surgery for cancer of esophagus.
Rao VS; Yeung MM; Cooke J; Salim E; Jain PK
J Surg Oncol; 2012 Jun; 105(8):745-9. PubMed ID: 22161989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction: influence of esophageal resection margin and operative approach on outcome.
Barbour AP; Rizk NP; Gonen M; Tang L; Bains MS; Rusch VW; Coit DG; Brennan MF
Ann Surg; 2007 Jul; 246(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 17592282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted transhiatal esophagectomy for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and esophago-gastric junction.
Montenovo MI; Chambers K; Pellegrini CA; Oelschlager BK
Dis Esophagus; 2011 Aug; 24(6):430-6. PubMed ID: 21309915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prognostic value of the circumferential resection margin and its definitions in esophageal cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.
Depypere L; Moons J; Lerut T; De Hertogh G; Peters C; Sagaert X; Coosemans W; Van Veer H; Nafteux P
Dis Esophagus; 2018 Feb; 31(2):. PubMed ID: 29036407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. How to define a positive circumferential resection margin in T3 adenocarcinoma of the esophagus.
Verhage RJ; Zandvoort HJ; ten Kate FJ; van Hillegersberg R
Am J Surg Pathol; 2011 Jun; 35(6):919-26. PubMed ID: 21566512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Tumor length as a prognostic factor in esophageal malignancy: univariate and multivariate survival analyses.
Griffiths EA; Brummell Z; Gorthi G; Pritchard SA; Welch IM
J Surg Oncol; 2006 Mar; 93(4):258-67. PubMed ID: 16496364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery for esophageal adenocarcinoma: prognostic value of circumferential resection margin and stratification of N1 category.
Saha AK; Sutton C; Rotimi O; Dexter S; Sue-Ling H; Sarela AI
Ann Surg Oncol; 2009 May; 16(5):1364-70. PubMed ID: 19252949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Predictors of long-term survival after resection of esophageal carcinoma with nonregional nodal metastases.
Lee PC; Port JL; Paul S; Stiles BM; Altorki NK
Ann Thorac Surg; 2009 Jul; 88(1):186-92; discussion 192-3. PubMed ID: 19559222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The influence of circumferential resection margin status on loco-regional recurrence in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Park HJ; Kim HJ; Chie EK; Kang CH; Kim YT
J Surg Oncol; 2013 Jun; 107(7):762-6. PubMed ID: 23280705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Indicators of prognosis after transhiatal esophageal resection without thoracotomy for cancer.
van Sandick JW; van Lanschot JJ; ten Kate FJ; Tijssen JG; Obertop H
J Am Coll Surg; 2002 Jan; 194(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 11803954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Lack of independent significance of a close (<1 mm) circumferential resection margin involvement in esophageal and junctional cancer.
O'Farrell NJ; Donohoe CL; Muldoon C; Costelloe JM; King S; Ravi N; Reynolds JV
Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 Aug; 20(8):2727-33. PubMed ID: 23463085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An audit of surgical outcomes of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Goan YG; Chang HC; Hsu HK; Chou YP
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2007 Mar; 31(3):536-44. PubMed ID: 17222561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Robot-assisted transhiatal esophagectomy: a 3-year single-center experience.
Dunn DH; Johnson EM; Morphew JA; Dilworth HP; Krueger JL; Banerji N
Dis Esophagus; 2013; 26(2):159-66. PubMed ID: 22394116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Proximal margin length with transhiatal gastrectomy for Siewert type II and III adenocarcinomas of the oesophagogastric junction.
Mine S; Sano T; Hiki N; Yamada K; Kosuga T; Nunobe S; Yamaguchi T
Br J Surg; 2013 Jul; 100(8):1050-4. PubMed ID: 23754647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
