These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
44. [What is not essential in the diagnosis of coronary heart disease?]. Hör G; Büll U Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1991 Feb; 116(7):276-7. PubMed ID: 1993444 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. The use of computer-assisted diagnosis in cardiac perfusion nuclear medicine studies: a review (Part 2). Datz FL; Gabor FV; Christian PE; Gullberg GT; Menzel CE; Morton KA J Digit Imaging; 1993 Feb; 6(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 8439577 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Planar, SPECT, PET: the quest to predict the unpredictable? Wackers FJ J Nucl Med; 1990 Dec; 31(12):1906-8. PubMed ID: 2266385 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Of theoretical derivations and empirical evidence. Goris ML J Nucl Med; 1992 Aug; 33(8):1578. PubMed ID: 1634958 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Is quantification necessary in SPECT perfusion imaging? Iskandrian AS Am J Cardiol; 1995 Jun; 75(16):1175-6. PubMed ID: 7762509 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Nitrates and viability: a durable affair. Sciagrà R J Nucl Med; 2003 May; 44(5):752-5. PubMed ID: 12732677 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. The road to quantitation of regional myocardial uptake of tracer. Tamaki N; Kuge Y; Tsukamoto E J Nucl Med; 2001 May; 42(5):780-1. PubMed ID: 11337576 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Three-dimensional display in nuclear medicine: a more useful depiction of reality, or only a superficial rendering? Links JM; Devous MD J Nucl Med; 1995 Apr; 36(4):703-4. PubMed ID: 7699468 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. A knowledge discovery approach to diagnosing myocardial perfusion. Cios KJ; Teresinska A; Konieczna S; Potocka J; Sharma S IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag; 2000; 19(4):17-25. PubMed ID: 10916729 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. What is the current status of quantification and nuclear medicine in cardiology? Hör G Eur J Nucl Med; 1996 Jul; 23(7):815-51. PubMed ID: 8662122 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Normalization of stress and delayed thallium-201 myocardial SPECT: where is the normal reference area? Esquerré JP; Gantet P; Ouhayoun E; Granier P J Nucl Med; 1991 Oct; 32(10):1901-3. PubMed ID: 1919729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. A prospective comparison of rubidium-82 PET and thallium-201 SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging utilizing a single dipyridamole stress in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Go RT; Marwick TH; MacIntyre WJ; Saha GB; Neumann DR; Underwood DA; Simpfendorfer CC J Nucl Med; 1990 Dec; 31(12):1899-905. PubMed ID: 2266384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. [Ischemic myocardial injury evaluated using positron emission tomography in children with coronary artery disease: comparison with thallium-201 SPECT]. Yoshibayashi M; Tamaki N; Nishioka K; Matsumura M; Yonekura Y; Yamashita K; Konishi J; Ban T; Mikawa H J Cardiol; 1992; 22(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 1307567 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Quantitative myocardial thallium single-photon emission computed tomography in normal women: demonstration of age-related differences. Cohen M; Touzery C; Cottin Y; Benoit T; d'Athis P; Roy S; Louis P; Wolf JE; Rigo P; Brunotte F Eur J Nucl Med; 1996 Jan; 23(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 8586098 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]