664 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19197953)
21. Estimating a treatment effect from multidimensional longitudinal data.
Gray SM; Brookmeyer R
Biometrics; 1998 Sep; 54(3):976-88. PubMed ID: 9750246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A simulation study to assess statistical methods for binary repeated measures data.
Masaoud E; Stryhn H
Prev Vet Med; 2010 Feb; 93(2-3):81-97. PubMed ID: 20004989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Analysis of incomplete longitudinal binary data using multiple imputation.
Li X; Mehrotra DV; Barnard J
Stat Med; 2006 Jun; 25(12):2107-24. PubMed ID: 16220495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparisons of methods for analysis of repeated binary responses with missing data.
Frank Liu G; Zhan X
J Biopharm Stat; 2011 May; 21(3):371-92. PubMed ID: 21442514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A latent process regression model for spatially correlated count data.
McShane LM; Albert PS; Palmatier MA
Biometrics; 1997 Jun; 53(2):698-706. PubMed ID: 9192458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of statistical methods for analysis of clustered binary observations.
Heo M; Leon AC
Stat Med; 2005 Mar; 24(6):911-23. PubMed ID: 15558576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Simultaneous inference and bias analysis for longitudinal data with covariate measurement error and missing responses.
Yi GY; Liu W; Wu L
Biometrics; 2011 Mar; 67(1):67-75. PubMed ID: 20528858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A comparison of methods to analyse continuous data from pseudo cluster randomized trials.
Teerenstra S; Moerbeek M; Melis RJ; Borm GF
Stat Med; 2007 Sep; 26(22):4100-15. PubMed ID: 17328006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A comparison of two methods for the estimation of precision with incomplete longitudinal data, jointly modelled with a time-to-event outcome.
Touloumi G; Babiker AG; Kenward MG; Pocock SJ; Darbyshire JH
Stat Med; 2003 Oct; 22(20):3161-75. PubMed ID: 14518021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Pseudo-likelihood methods for longitudinal binary data with non-ignorable missing responses and covariates.
Parzen M; Lipsitz SR; Fitzmaurice GM; Ibrahim JG; Troxel A
Stat Med; 2006 Aug; 25(16):2784-96. PubMed ID: 16345018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Analysis of longitudinal multinomial outcome data.
Li YP; Chan W
Biom J; 2006 Apr; 48(2):319-26. PubMed ID: 16708781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A nonparametric smoothing method for assessing GEE models with longitudinal binary data.
Lin KC; Chen YJ; Shyr Y
Stat Med; 2008 Sep; 27(22):4428-39. PubMed ID: 18613210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Unequally spaced longitudinal data with AR(1) serial correlation.
Jones RH; Boadi-Boateng F
Biometrics; 1991 Mar; 47(1):161-75. PubMed ID: 2049497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A comparison of the statistical power of different methods for the analysis of cluster randomization trials with binary outcomes.
Austin PC
Stat Med; 2007 Aug; 26(19):3550-65. PubMed ID: 17238238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Analyzing spatially distributed binary data using independent-block estimating equations.
Oman SD; Landsman V; Carmel Y; Kadmon R
Biometrics; 2007 Sep; 63(3):892-900. PubMed ID: 17489971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Performance of weighted estimating equations for longitudinal binary data with drop-outs missing at random.
Preisser JS; Lohman KK; Rathouz PJ
Stat Med; 2002 Oct; 21(20):3035-54. PubMed ID: 12369080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Analysis of failure time data with multilevel clustering, with application to the child vitamin a intervention trial in Nepal.
Shih JH; Lu SE
Biometrics; 2007 Sep; 63(3):673-80. PubMed ID: 17825001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Bayesian analysis of crossclassified spatial data with autocorrelation.
Sun L; Clayton MK
Biometrics; 2008 Mar; 64(1):74-84. PubMed ID: 17680834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Marginalized random effects models for multivariate longitudinal binary data.
Lee K; Joo Y; Yoo JK; Lee J
Stat Med; 2009 Apr; 28(8):1284-300. PubMed ID: 19156673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Sample size determination for constrained longitudinal data analysis.
Lu K; Mehrotra DV; Liu G
Stat Med; 2009 Feb; 28(4):679-99. PubMed ID: 19051207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
