663 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19197953)
61. Semiparametric inference for surrogate endpoints with bivariate censored data.
Ghosh D
Biometrics; 2008 Mar; 64(1):149-56. PubMed ID: 17651457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. A comparison of statistical methods for clustered data analysis with Gaussian error.
Feng Z; McLerran D; Grizzle J
Stat Med; 1996 Aug; 15(16):1793-806. PubMed ID: 8870161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Dynamic comparison of Kaplan-Meier proportions: monitoring a randomized clinical trial with a long-term binary endpoint.
Brittain E; Follmann D; Yang S
Biometrics; 2008 Mar; 64(1):189-97. PubMed ID: 17680830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Analysis of change in the presence of informative censoring: application to a longitudinal clinical trial of progressive renal disease.
Schluchter MD; Greene T; Beck GJ
Stat Med; 2001 Apr; 20(7):989-1007. PubMed ID: 11276031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. An application of maximum likelihood and generalized estimating equations to the analysis of ordinal data from a longitudinal study with cases missing at random.
Kenward MG; Lesaffre E; Molenberghs G
Biometrics; 1994 Dec; 50(4):945-53. PubMed ID: 7787007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Inference methods for saturated models in longitudinal clinical trials with incomplete binary data.
Song JX
Pharm Stat; 2006; 5(4):295-304. PubMed ID: 17128429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Robust estimating functions and bias correction for longitudinal data analysis.
Wang YG; Lin X; Zhu M
Biometrics; 2005 Sep; 61(3):684-91. PubMed ID: 16135019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Effect of omitted confounders on the analysis of correlated binary data.
Chao WH; Palta M; Young T
Biometrics; 1997 Jun; 53(2):678-89. PubMed ID: 9192456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Regularized sandwich estimators for analysis of high-dimensional data using generalized estimating equations.
Warton DI
Biometrics; 2011 Mar; 67(1):116-23. PubMed ID: 20528857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Sample size for a two-group comparison of repeated binary measurements using GEE.
Jung SH; Ahn CW
Stat Med; 2005 Sep; 24(17):2583-96. PubMed ID: 16118812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. The impact of dichotomization in longitudinal data analysis: a simulation study.
Yoo B
Pharm Stat; 2010; 9(4):298-312. PubMed ID: 19904810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Pattern-mixture zero-inflated mixed models for longitudinal unbalanced count data with excessive zeros.
Hasan MT; Sneddon G; Ma R
Biom J; 2009 Dec; 51(6):946-60. PubMed ID: 20029895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. A two-part joint model for the analysis of survival and longitudinal binary data with excess zeros.
Rizopoulos D; Verbeke G; Lesaffre E; Vanrenterghem Y
Biometrics; 2008 Jun; 64(2):611-9. PubMed ID: 17725808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Analysis of longitudinal data with unmeasured confounders.
Palta M; Yao TJ
Biometrics; 1991 Dec; 47(4):1355-69. PubMed ID: 1786323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. A copula model for repeated measurements with non-ignorable non-monotone missing outcome.
Shen C; Weissfeld L
Stat Med; 2006 Jul; 25(14):2427-40. PubMed ID: 16143999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Longitudinal data analysis for discrete and continuous outcomes.
Zeger SL; Liang KY
Biometrics; 1986 Mar; 42(1):121-30. PubMed ID: 3719049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Analysis of longitudinal count data with serial correlation.
Xu S; Jones RH; Grunwald GK
Biom J; 2007 Jun; 49(3):416-28. PubMed ID: 17623346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Marginalized models for moderate to long series of longitudinal binary response data.
Schildcrout JS; Heagerty PJ
Biometrics; 2007 Jun; 63(2):322-31. PubMed ID: 17688485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Methods for interaction analyses using family-based case-control data: conditional logistic regression versus generalized estimating equations.
Hancock DB; Martin ER; Li YJ; Scott WK
Genet Epidemiol; 2007 Dec; 31(8):883-93. PubMed ID: 17565751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. What can go wrong when ignoring correlation bounds in the use of generalized estimating equations.
Sabo RT; Chaganty NR
Stat Med; 2010 Oct; 29(24):2501-7. PubMed ID: 20690109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
