These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19197960)

  • 1. Re-formulating non-inferiority trials as superiority trials: The case of binary outcomes.
    Durkalski VL; Berger VW
    Biom J; 2009 Feb; 51(1):185-92. PubMed ID: 19197960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Adaptive randomization for multiarm comparative clinical trials based on joint efficacy/toxicity outcomes.
    Ji Y; Bekele BN
    Biometrics; 2009 Sep; 65(3):876-84. PubMed ID: 19173694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A mixed approach for proving non-inferiority in clinical trials with binary endpoints.
    Rousson V; Seifert B
    Biom J; 2008 Apr; 50(2):190-204. PubMed ID: 18311852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Multiple-arm superiority and non-inferiority designs with various endpoints.
    Chang M
    Pharm Stat; 2007; 6(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 17323311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Methodological and statistical aspects of equivalence and non inferiority trials].
    Elie C; De Rycke Y; Jais JP; Marion-Gallois R; Landais P
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2008 Aug; 56(4):267-77. PubMed ID: 18703296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Modified Haybittle-Peto group sequential designs for testing superiority and non-inferiority hypotheses in clinical trials.
    Lai TL; Shih MC; Zhu G
    Stat Med; 2006 Apr; 25(7):1149-67. PubMed ID: 16189814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Active-controlled, non-inferiority trials in oncology: arbitrary limits, infeasible sample sizes and uninformative data analysis. is there another way?
    Carroll KJ
    Pharm Stat; 2006; 5(4):283-93. PubMed ID: 17128427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A unifying approach to non-inferiority, equivalence and superiority tests via multiple decision processes.
    Hirotsu C
    Pharm Stat; 2007; 6(3):193-203. PubMed ID: 17879327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Non-inferiority trials: design concepts and issues - the encounters of academic consultants in statistics.
    D'Agostino RB; Massaro JM; Sullivan LM
    Stat Med; 2003 Jan; 22(2):169-86. PubMed ID: 12520555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A note on the conservativeness of the confidence interval approach for the selection of non-inferiority margin in the two-arm active-control trial.
    Sankoh AJ
    Stat Med; 2008 Aug; 27(19):3732-42. PubMed ID: 18407575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Choosing the analysis population in non-inferiority studies: per protocol or intent-to-treat.
    Matilde Sanchez M; Chen X
    Stat Med; 2006 Apr; 25(7):1169-81. PubMed ID: 16397861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Group sequential test strategies for superiority and non-inferiority hypotheses in active controlled clinical trials.
    Wang SJ; Hung HM; Tsong Y; Cui L
    Stat Med; 2001 Jul; 20(13):1903-12. PubMed ID: 11427948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Statistical tests based on new composite hypotheses in clinical trials reflecting the relative clinical importance of multiple endpoints quantitatively.
    Nishikawa M; Tango T; Ohtaki M
    Biom J; 2009 Oct; 51(5):749-62. PubMed ID: 19777463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing non-inferiority: a combination approach.
    Gao P; Ware JH
    Stat Med; 2008 Feb; 27(3):392-406. PubMed ID: 17575568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Note on simultaneous inferences about non-inferiority and superiority for a primary and a secondary endpoint.
    Guilbaud O
    Biom J; 2011 Nov; 53(6):927-37. PubMed ID: 22002473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Strength of evidence of non-inferiority trials-The adjustment of the type I error rate in non-inferiority trials with the synthesis method.
    Kang SH; Tsong Y
    Stat Med; 2010 Jun; 29(14):1477-87. PubMed ID: 20535762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Non-inferiority study design: lessons to be learned from cardiovascular trials.
    Head SJ; Kaul S; Bogers AJ; Kappetein AP
    Eur Heart J; 2012 Jun; 33(11):1318-24. PubMed ID: 22564354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Testing homogeneity of two zero-inflated Poisson populations.
    Tse SK; Chow SC; Lu Q; Cosmatos D
    Biom J; 2009 Feb; 51(1):159-70. PubMed ID: 19219907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Current issues in non-inferiority trials.
    Fleming TR
    Stat Med; 2008 Feb; 27(3):317-32. PubMed ID: 17340597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Statistical notes. From superiority to non-inferiority clinical trials: a leap in the dark?].
    Marubini E; Rebora P; Reina G
    Ital Heart J Suppl; 2004 Sep; 5(9):712-9. PubMed ID: 15568609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.