These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19198861)

  • 21. In vitro cyclic testing of the Exeter stem after cement within cement revision.
    Wilson LJ; Bell CG; Weinrauch P; Crawford R
    J Arthroplasty; 2009 Aug; 24(5):789-94. PubMed ID: 18534400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Analysis of cement mantles in collared versus collarless femoral components.
    Mahoney CR; Yun AG; Pellicci PM
    Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2006 May; 35(5):235-6. PubMed ID: 16764183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Cement mantle retention: filling the hole.
    Cross M; Bostrom M
    Orthopedics; 2009 Sep; 32(9):. PubMed ID: 19751012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Assessment of cement introduction and pressurization techniques.
    Dunne NJ; Orr JF; Beverland DE
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2004; 218(1):11-25. PubMed ID: 14982342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. In vitro interface and cement mantle analysis of different femur stem designs.
    Gravius S; Wirtz DC; Siebert CH; Andereya S; Mueller-Rath R; Maus U; Mumme T
    J Biomech; 2008; 41(9):2021-8. PubMed ID: 18514207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Revision of the cemented femoral stem using a cement-in-cement technique: a five- to 15-year review.
    Duncan WW; Hubble MJ; Howell JR; Whitehouse SL; Timperley AJ; Gie GA
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2009 May; 91(5):577-82. PubMed ID: 19407288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Anatomic stem design reduces risk of thin cement mantles in primary hip replacement.
    Hank C; Schneider M; Achary CS; Smith L; Breusch SJ
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2010 Jan; 130(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 19513737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Initial stability of cemented femoral stems as a function of surface finish, collar, and stem size.
    Ebramzadeh E; Sangiorgio SN; Longjohn DB; Buhari CF; Dorr LD
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2004 Jan; 86(1):106-15. PubMed ID: 14711952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Can finite element models detect clinically inferior cemented hip implants?
    Stolk J; Maher SA; Verdonschot N; Prendergast PJ; Huiskes R
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2003 Apr; (409):138-50. PubMed ID: 12671496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Acetabular cement mantles and component position: are we achieving "ideal" results?
    Sandhu HS; Martin WN; Bishay M; Pozo JL
    J Arthroplasty; 2006 Sep; 21(6):841-5. PubMed ID: 16950036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Finite element analysis of the effect of cementing concepts on implant stability and cement fatigue failure.
    Janssen D; van Aken J; Scheerlinck T; Verdonschot N
    Acta Orthop; 2009 Jun; 80(3):319-24. PubMed ID: 19421913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effects of dorsal flanges on fixation of a cemented total hip replacement femoral stem.
    Sangiorgio SN; Ebramzadeh E; Longjohn DB; Dorr LD
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2004 Apr; 86(4):813-20. PubMed ID: 15069149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effect of undersizing on the long-term stability of the Exeter hip stem: A comparative in vitro study.
    Cristofolini L; Erani P; Bialoblocka-Juszczyk E; Ohashi H; Iida S; Minato I; Viceconti M
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2010 Nov; 25(9):899-908. PubMed ID: 20659780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Application of an amphiphilic bonder in a goat model to increase the femoral cement-bone adhesion in cemented hip arthroplasty].
    Müller-Rath R; Wirtz D; Andereya S; Gravius S; Hermanns-Sachweh B; Marx R; Mumme T
    Z Orthop Unfall; 2007; 145(4):476-82. PubMed ID: 17912668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Initial stability of fully and partially cemented femoral stems.
    Claes L; Fiedler S; Ohnmacht M; Duda GN
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2000 Dec; 15(10):750-5. PubMed ID: 11050357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Influence of bone density on the cement fixation of femoral hip resurfacing components.
    Bitsch RG; Jäger S; Lürssen M; Loidolt T; Schmalzried TP; Clarius M
    J Orthop Res; 2010 Aug; 28(8):986-91. PubMed ID: 20162694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The importance of a thick cement mantle depends on stem geometry and stem-cement interfacial bonding.
    Caruana J; Janssen D; Verdonschot N; Blunn GW
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2009 Apr; 223(3):315-27. PubMed ID: 19405437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Mathematical simulation of stem/cement/bone mechanical interactions for Poldi-Cech, CF-30, MS-30 and PFC femoral components].
    Kovanda M; Havlícek V; Hudec J
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Apr; 76(2):110-5. PubMed ID: 19439130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Impact of implant size on cement filling in hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
    de Haan R; Buls N; Scheerlinck T
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2014 Jan; 228(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 24170701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Challenges in relating experimental hip implant fixation predictions to clinical observations.
    Sangiorgio SN; Longjohn DB; Dorr LD; Ebramzadeh E
    J Biomech; 2011 Jan; 44(2):235-43. PubMed ID: 21040920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.