188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19198911)
21. Estimation of valvular resistance of segmented aortic valves using computational fluid dynamics.
Hoeijmakers MJMM; Silva Soto DA; Waechter-Stehle I; Kasztelnik M; Weese J; Hose DR; de Vosse FNV
J Biomech; 2019 Sep; 94():49-58. PubMed ID: 31358285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Application of large-eddy simulation to the study of pulsatile flow in a modeled arterial stenosis.
Mittal R; Simmons SP; Udaykumar HS
J Biomech Eng; 2001 Aug; 123(4):325-32. PubMed ID: 11563757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Dependence of Gorlin formula and continuity equation valve areas on transvalvular volume flow rate in valvular aortic stenosis.
Burwash IG; Thomas DD; Sadahiro M; Pearlman AS; Verrier ED; Thomas R; Kraft CD; Otto CM
Circulation; 1994 Feb; 89(2):827-35. PubMed ID: 8313572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Determining the degree of stenosis of peripheral arteries. Hemodynamic and ultrasound principles].
Neuerburg-Heusler D; Karasch T
Vasa; 1996; 25(2):109-13. PubMed ID: 8659211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Valvular and systemic arterial hemodynamics in aortic valve stenosis. A model-based approach.
Laskey WK; Kussmaul WG; Noordergraaf A
Circulation; 1995 Sep; 92(6):1473-8. PubMed ID: 7664429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Impact of aortic stiffness on central hemodynamics and cardiovascular system].
Bulas J; Potočárová M; Filková M; Simková A; Murín J
Vnitr Lek; 2013 Jun; 59(6):444-9. PubMed ID: 23808736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Derivation of a simplified relation for assessing aortic root pressure drop incorporating wall compliance.
Mohammadi H; Cartier R; Mongrain R
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2015 Mar; 53(3):241-51. PubMed ID: 25430422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Multiple subcritical arterial stenoses: effect on poststenotic pressure and flow.
Flanigan DP; Tullis JP; Streeter VL; Whitehouse WM; Fry WJ; Stanley JC
Ann Surg; 1977 Nov; 186(5):663-8. PubMed ID: 921360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The haemodynamics of asymmetric stenoses.
Dodds SR
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2002 Oct; 24(4):332-7. PubMed ID: 12323176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Fluid structure interaction modelling of aortic valve stenosis: Effects of valve calcification on coronary artery flow and aortic root hemodynamics.
Kivi AR; Sedaghatizadeh N; Cazzolato BS; Zander AC; Roberts-Thomson R; Nelson AJ; Arjomandi M
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2020 Nov; 196():105647. PubMed ID: 32688138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The effect of varying degrees of stenosis on the characteristics of turbulent pulsatile flow through heart valves.
Bluestein D; Einav S
J Biomech; 1995 Aug; 28(8):915-24. PubMed ID: 7673259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A ventricular-vascular coupling model in presence of aortic stenosis.
Garcia D; Barenbrug PJ; Pibarot P; Dekker AL; van der Veen FH; Maessen JG; Dumesnil JG; Durand LG
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol; 2005 Apr; 288(4):H1874-84. PubMed ID: 15604131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Wave propagation in a model of the arterial circulation.
Wang JJ; Parker KH
J Biomech; 2004 Apr; 37(4):457-70. PubMed ID: 14996557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Mathematical, numerical and experimental study in the human aorta with coexisting models of bicuspid aortic stenosis and coarctation of the aorta.
Keshavarz-Motamed Z; Garcia J; Kadem L
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2011; 2011():182-5. PubMed ID: 22254280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Determining the Predominant Lesion in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis and Coronary Stenoses: A Multicenter Study Using Intracoronary Pressure and Flow.
Ahmad Y; Vendrik J; Eftekhari A; Howard JP; Cook C; Rajkumar C; Malik I; Mikhail G; Ruparelia N; Hadjiloizou N; Nijjer S; Al-Lamee R; Petraco R; Warisawa T; Wijntjens GWM; Koch KT; van de Hoef T; de Waard G; Echavarria-Pinto M; Frame A; Sutaria N; Kanaganayagam G; Ariff B; Anderson J; Chukwuemeka A; Fertleman M; Koul S; Iglesias JF; Francis D; Mayet J; Serruys P; Davies J; Escaned J; van Royen N; Götberg M; Juhl Terkelsen C; Høj Christiansen E; Piek JJ; Baan J; Sen S
Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Dec; 12(12):e008263. PubMed ID: 31752515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The Role of Imaging of Flow Patterns by 4D Flow MRI in Aortic Stenosis.
Garcia J; Barker AJ; Markl M
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Feb; 12(2):252-266. PubMed ID: 30732721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. How can the assessment of the hemodynamic significance of aortoiliac arterial stenosis by duplex scanning be improved? A comparative study with intraarterial pressure measurement.
Legemate DA; Teeuwen C; Hoeneveld H; Eikelboom BC
J Vasc Surg; 1993 Apr; 17(4):676-84. PubMed ID: 8464085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Hemodynamic significance assessment of equivocal iliac artery stenoses by comparing duplex ultrasonography with intra-arterial pressure measurements.
Heinen SG; de Boer SW; van den Heuvel DA; Huberts W; Dekker P; van de Vosse FN; Delhaas T; de Vries JP
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 2018 Feb; 59(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 28849900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Dynamic simulation of aortic valve stenosis using a lumped parameter cardiovascular system model with flow regime dependent valve pressure loss characteristics.
Laubscher R; van der Merwe J; Liebenberg J; Herbst P
Med Eng Phys; 2022 Aug; 106():103838. PubMed ID: 35926953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Nonlinear model on pulsatile flow of blood through a porous bifurcated arterial stenosis in the presence of magnetic field and periodic body acceleration.
Ponalagusamy R; Priyadharshini S
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2017 Apr; 142():31-41. PubMed ID: 28325445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
