134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19200953)
1. Computed tomographic confirmation of distally placed Essure* microinsert.
Palmer AB; Siegle JC
Fertil Steril; 2009 Apr; 91(4):1294.e5-7. PubMed ID: 19200953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Incorrect position of Essure microinserts 3 months after successful bilateral placement.
Gerritse MB; Veersema S; Timmermans A; Brölmann HA
Fertil Steril; 2009 Mar; 91(3):930.e1-5. PubMed ID: 18945426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Follow-up of successful bilateral placement of Essure microinserts with ultrasound.
Veersema S; Vleugels MP; Timmermans A; Brölmann HA
Fertil Steril; 2005 Dec; 84(6):1733-6. PubMed ID: 16359973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Intraoperative Factors that Predict the Successful Placement of Essure Microinserts.
Arthuis CJ; Simon EG; Hébert T; Marret H
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(5):803-810. PubMed ID: 28390945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Essure transcervical tubal sterilization: a 5-year x-ray follow up.
Franchini M; Boeri C; Calzolari S; Imperatore A; Cianferoni L; Litta P; Giarrè G; Zerbetto I; Moncini I; Florio P
Fertil Steril; 2011 May; 95(6):2114-5. PubMed ID: 21392751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Confirmation of Essure microinsert tubal coil placement with conventional and volume-contrast imaging three-dimensional ultrasound.
Thiel JA; Suchet IB; Lortie K
Fertil Steril; 2005 Aug; 84(2):504-8. PubMed ID: 16084897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Essure insert expulsion after 3-month hysterosalpingogram confirmation of bilateral tubal occlusion and bilateral correct placement: case report.
Garcia AL; Lewis RM; Sloan AL
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2013; 20(1):107-11. PubMed ID: 23312251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Essure Permanent Birth Control, Effectiveness and Safety: An Italian 11-Year Survey.
Franchini M; Zizolfi B; Coppola C; Bergamini V; Bonin C; Borsellino G; Busato E; Calabrese S; Calzolari S; Fantin GP; Giarrè G; Litta P; Luerti M; Mangino FP; Marchino GL; Molinari MA; Scatena E; Scrimin F; Telloli P; Di Spiezio Sardo A
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(4):640-645. PubMed ID: 28232037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ultrasound assessment of the Essure contraceptive devices: is three-dimensional ultrasound really needed?
Paladini D; Di Spiezio Sardo A; Coppola C; Zizolfi B; Pastore G; Nappi C
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015 Jan; 22(1):115-21. PubMed ID: 25241073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A kink is not always a perforation: assessing Essure hysteroscopic sterilization placement.
Borley J; Shabajee N; Tan TL
Fertil Steril; 2011 Jun; 95(7):2429.e15-7. PubMed ID: 21367412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Technique for the Laparoscopic Removal of Essure Microinserts.
Mahmoud MS
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(4):472. PubMed ID: 26776673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Essure microinsert imaging: does abnormal shape on ultrasound predict complications on HSG?
VanBuren WM; Suchet IB; Thiel JA; Karreman E
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2016 Dec; 41(12):2350-2358. PubMed ID: 27022912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of three-dimensional ultrasound examination classification to check the position of the tubal sterilization microinsert.
Legendre G; Gervaise A; Levaillant JM; Faivre E; Deffieux X; Fernandez H
Fertil Steril; 2010 Dec; 94(7):2732-5. PubMed ID: 20451183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Radiological assessment of placement of the hysteroscopically inserted Essure permanent birth control device.
Lorente Ramos RM; Azpeitia Armán J; Aparicio Rodríguez-Miñón P; Salazar Arquero FJ; Albillos Merino JC
Radiologia; 2015; 57(3):193-200. PubMed ID: 25656567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pre-hysterectomy assessment of immediate tubal occlusion with the third-generation ESSURE insert (ESS505).
Thiel J; Rattray D; Cher DJ
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(6):1055-60. PubMed ID: 24861649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Tubal perforation by Essure: three different clinical presentations.
Langenveld J; Veersema S; Bongers MY; Koks CA
Fertil Steril; 2008 Nov; 90(5):2011.e5-10. PubMed ID: 18692813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Contrast infusion sonography to assess microinsert placement and tubal occlusion after Essure.
Connor VF
Fertil Steril; 2006 Jun; 85(6):1791-3. PubMed ID: 16650420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Hysterosalpingogram: an essential examination following Essure hysteroscopic sterilisation.
Shah V; Panay N; Williamson R; Hemingway A
Br J Radiol; 2011 Sep; 84(1005):805-12. PubMed ID: 21123309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Unintended pregnancy after long-term Essure microinserts placement.
Arjona JE; Serrano JJ; Povedano B; Carrasco S; Castelo-Branco C
Fertil Steril; 2010 Dec; 94(7):2793-5. PubMed ID: 20646689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Necessity of hysterosalpingography after Essure microinsert placement for contraception.
Lazarus E; Lourenco AP; Casper S; Allen RH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Jun; 198(6):1460-3. PubMed ID: 22623563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
