These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19201219)

  • 21. Quality aspects of digital radiography in general dental practice.
    Hellén-Halme K
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2007; (184):9-60. PubMed ID: 17645148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Diagnostic accuracy of two software modalities for detection of caries lesions in digital radiographs from four dental systems.
    Hintze H
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Mar; 35(2):78-82. PubMed ID: 16549433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effect of display type, DICOM calibration and room illuminance in bitewing radiographs.
    Kallio-Pulkkinen S; Huumonen S; Haapea M; Liukkonen E; Sipola A; Tervonen O; Nieminen MT
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(1):20150129. PubMed ID: 26234536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Histologic and radiographic assessment of caries-like lesions localized at the crown margin.
    Zoellner A; Diemer B; Weber HP; Stassinakis A; Gaengler P
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jul; 88(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 12239481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. An in vitro comparison of detection methods for approximal carious lesions in primary molars.
    Chawla N; Messer LB; Adams GG; Manton DJ
    Caries Res; 2012; 46(2):161-9. PubMed ID: 22508449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The effect of wavelet and discrete cosine transform compression of digital radiographs on the detection of subtle proximal caries. ROC analysis.
    Schulze RK; Richter A; d'Hoedt B
    Caries Res; 2008; 42(5):334-9. PubMed ID: 18701823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Influence of brightness and contrast adjustments on the diagnosis of proximal caries lesions.
    Nascimento EH; Gaêta-Araujo H; Vasconcelos KF; Freire BB; Oliveira-Santos C; Haiter-Neto F; Freitas DQ
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2018 Dec; 47(8):20180100. PubMed ID: 29851369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Diagnosis of approximal caries: bite-wing radiology versus the Ultrasound Caries Detector. An in vitro study.
    Matalon S; Feuerstein O; Kaffe I
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 May; 95(5):626-31. PubMed ID: 12738956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of microscopy and radiography as gold standards in radiographic caries diagnosis.
    Wenzel A; Hintze H
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 May; 28(3):182-5. PubMed ID: 10740474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Is the digital radiographic detection of approximal caries lesions influenced by viewing conditions?
    Lima CAS; Nascimento EHL; Gaêta-Araujo H; Oliveira-Santos C; Freitas DQ; Haiter-Neto F; Oliveira ML
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2020 Feb; 129(2):165-170. PubMed ID: 31474575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Detection of approximal caries in digital radiographs before and after correction for attenuation and visual response. An in vitro study.
    Li G; Yoshiura K; Welander U; Shi XQ; McDavid WD
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Mar; 31(2):113-6. PubMed ID: 12076051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of standard and task-specific enhancement of Digora storage phosphor images for approximal caries diagnosis.
    Møystad A; Svanaes DB; van der Stelt PF; Gröndahl HG; Wenzel A; van Ginkel FC; Kullendorff B; Hintze H; Larheim TA
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Nov; 32(6):390-6. PubMed ID: 15070842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Performance of 5 different displays in the detection of artificial incipient and recurrent caries-like lesions.
    Countryman SC; Sousa Melo SL; Belem MDF; Haiter-Neto F; Vargas MA; Allareddy V
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2018 Feb; 125(2):182-191. PubMed ID: 29242128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The efficiency of three different films and radiovisiography in detecting approximal carious lesions.
    Erten H; Akarslan ZZ; Topuz O
    Quintessence Int; 2005 Jan; 36(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 15709499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. In vitro comparison of digital and conventional bitewing radiographs for the detection of approximal caries in primary teeth exposed and viewed by a new wireless handheld unit.
    Ulusu T; Bodur H; Odabaş ME
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2010 Feb; 39(2):91-4. PubMed ID: 20100920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison between DICOM-calibrated and uncalibrated consumer grade and 6-MP displays under different lighting conditions in panoramic radiography.
    Kallio-Pulkkinen S; Haapea M; Liukkonen E; Huumonen S; Tervonen O; Nieminen MT
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(5):20140365. PubMed ID: 25564888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Digital radiology and image analysis for approximal caries diagnosis.
    Forner L; Llena MC; Almerich JM; García-Godoy F
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(5):312-5. PubMed ID: 10823079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Grey-scale reversed radiographic display in the detection of approximal caries.
    Haak R; Wicht MJ
    J Dent; 2005 Jan; 33(1):65-71. PubMed ID: 15652170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Influence of the digital image display monitor on observer performance.
    Cederberg RA; Frederiksen NL; Benson BW; Shulman JD
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Jul; 28(4):203-7. PubMed ID: 10455382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Accuracy of caries diagnosis in digital images from charge-coupled device and storage phosphor systems: an in vitro study.
    Wenzel A; Borg E; Hintze H; Gröndahl HG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Nov; 24(4):250-4. PubMed ID: 9161170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.