244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19201296)
1. Reporting of harms and adverse events in otolaryngology journals.
Bibawy H; Cossu A; Cogan S; Rosenfeld R
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2009 Feb; 140(2):241-4. PubMed ID: 19201296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Do abstracts in otolaryngology journals report study findings accurately?
McCoul ED; Vengerovich G; Burstein DH; Rosenfeld RM
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2010 Feb; 142(2):225-30. PubMed ID: 20115979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Randomized controlled trials in otolaryngology journals.
Yao F; Singer M; Rosenfeld RM
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2007 Oct; 137(4):539-44. PubMed ID: 17903567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Levels of evidence in otolaryngology journals.
Wasserman JM; Wynn R; Bash TS; Rosenfeld RM
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2006 May; 134(5):717-23. PubMed ID: 16647522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Safety on an inpatient pediatric otolaryngology service: many small errors, few adverse events.
Shah RK; Lander L; Forbes P; Jenkins K; Healy GB; Roberson DW
Laryngoscope; 2009 May; 119(5):871-9. PubMed ID: 19358191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Peer review: studying the major otolaryngology journals.
Bhattacharyya N
Laryngoscope; 1999 Apr; 109(4):640-4. PubMed ID: 10201756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reporting adverse events in randomized controlled trials.
Nuovo J; Sather C
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2007 Mar; 16(3):349-51. PubMed ID: 16998947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Do medical inpatients who report poor service quality experience more adverse events and medical errors?
Taylor BB; Marcantonio ER; Pagovich O; Carbo A; Bergmann M; Davis RB; Bates DW; Phillips RS; Weingart SN
Med Care; 2008 Feb; 46(2):224-8. PubMed ID: 18219252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Are benefits and harms in mammography screening given equal attention in scientific articles? A cross-sectional study.
Jørgensen KJ; Klahn A; Gøtzsche PC
BMC Med; 2007 May; 5():12. PubMed ID: 17537243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Adverse events in acute care: an integrative literature review.
Kellogg VA; Havens DS
Res Nurs Health; 2003 Oct; 26(5):398-408. PubMed ID: 14579260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A trigger tool fails to identify serious errors and adverse events in pediatric otolaryngology.
Lander L; Roberson DW; Plummer KM; Forbes PW; Healy GB; Shah RK
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2010 Oct; 143(4):480-6. PubMed ID: 20869555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Increased female authorship in otolaryngology over the past three decades.
Bhattacharyya N; Shapiro NL
Laryngoscope; 2000 Mar; 110(3 Pt 1):358-61. PubMed ID: 10718419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The quality of reporting of trial abstracts is suboptimal: survey of major general medical journals.
Berwanger O; Ribeiro RA; Finkelsztejn A; Watanabe M; Suzumura EA; Duncan BB; Devereaux PJ; Cook D
J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Apr; 62(4):387-92. PubMed ID: 19010643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Improving depiction of benefits and harms: analyses of studies of well-known therapeutics and review of high-impact medical journals.
Sedrakyan A; Shih C
Med Care; 2007 Oct; 45(10 Supl 2):S23-8. PubMed ID: 17909378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Why should surgeons care about clinical research methodology?
Chang DC; Matsen SL; Simpkins CE
J Am Coll Surg; 2006 Dec; 203(6):827-30. PubMed ID: 17116550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Development of an online morbidity, mortality, and near-miss reporting system to identify patterns of adverse events in surgical patients.
Bilimoria KY; Kmiecik TE; DaRosa DA; Halverson A; Eskandari MK; Bell RH; Soper NJ; Wayne JD
Arch Surg; 2009 Apr; 144(4):305-11; discussion 311. PubMed ID: 19380642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Methodological shortcomings predicted lower harm estimates in one of two sets of studies of clinical interventions.
Chou R; Fu R; Carson S; Saha S; Helfand M
J Clin Epidemiol; 2007 Jan; 60(1):18-28. PubMed ID: 17161750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Publications by the American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Urology: the quality of research design and statistical methodology.
Afshar K; Jafari S; Seth A; Lee JK; MacNeily AE
J Urol; 2009 Oct; 182(4 Suppl):1906-10. PubMed ID: 19695587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Research publication by pharmacist authors in major medical journals: changes over a 10-year interval.
Touchette DR; Bearden DT; Ottum SA
Pharmacotherapy; 2008 May; 28(5):584-90. PubMed ID: 18447657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Are studies reporting significant results more likely to be published?
Koletsi D; Karagianni A; Pandis N; Makou M; Polychronopoulou A; Eliades T
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Nov; 136(5):632.e1-5; discussion 632-3. PubMed ID: 19892276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
